BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 1305 Page 1 Date of Hearing: May 13, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Jimmy Gomez, Chair AB 1305 (Bonta) - As Amended May 5, 2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy |Health |Vote:|18 - 0 | |Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: YesReimbursable: No SUMMARY: This bill requires, for health insurance provided on a family coverage basis, deductibles and out-of-pocket maximums for coverage of essential health benefits (EHBs), to include a AB 1305 Page 2 maximum deductible and out-of-pocket limit for each individual covered by the plan or policy, that is less than or equal to the maximum deductible and out-of-pocket limit for an individual. It also makes exceptions for certain high-deductible health plans and policies, to ensure they comply with federal rules. FISCAL EFFECT: The California Health Benefit Review Program estimates: 1)No impact on publicly funded health insurance programs. 2)Reduced expenditures in the private market of tens of millions of dollars, mostly in the form of reduced premium payments for individually purchased insurance, based on individual cost-sharing amounts going up to family cost-sharing amounts for some consumers. However, CHBRP states this is likely an overestimate due to data limitations. Any impact on expenditures would depend on how product offerings and consumer behavior changed to comply with this bill's provisions. COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. According to the author, this bill prohibits a health AB 1305 Page 3 plan or insurer from imposing a higher deductible and out-of-pocket cost limit on an individual simply because the individual is a member of a family. The author explains that health plans and insurance policies often include a deductible amount, as well as limits on the amount out-of-pocket costs a person or family may incur in a year. The author states that some family plans and policies include deductibles and out-of-pocket limits for an individual in the plan or policy, so when a family member gets sick, they only have to reach the individual deductible or cost-sharing limit in order for coverage to kick-in. However, the author states other plans and insurers do not include these individual deductibles and out-of-pocket costs limits within a family plan or policy, which means that families with one member who has more expensive health care needs would have to reach the higher family limits before coverage kicks in. The author contends that under this structure, families with one member with high health care costs are forced to pay thousands of dollars in out-of-pocket expenses simply because they are in a family. The author states that this bill creates parity between what consumers pay in individual and family plans by requiring individual deductibles to be embedded in family plans. The author concludes that this bill is consistent with federal regulations regarding limits on out-of-pocket cost sharing, and will make California a national leader in terms of deductibles. 2)CHBRP Analysis. CHBRP conducted an evidence-based assessment of this bill which was published on April 22, 2015. According to the analysis, this bill only impacts the private insurance market outside the Exchange. Over 97% of enrollees in plans or policies subject to this bill are covered by plans and policies that have no deductible, or already have an embedded deductible. CHBRP found high-deductible health plans, which can be paired with tax-advantaged health savings accounts or health AB 1305 Page 4 reimbursement accounts, would be the only products affected by this bill. As such, this bill would affect the insurance of approximately 2.1% (506,722) of the 24.6 million Californians who have health insurance regulated by the state that may be subject to any state health benefit mandate law. CHBRP assumed insurers would have to make the self-only deductible match the family coverage deductible of $2,600. This increase in deductibles for individuals who are purchasing these products for self-only coverage lead to CHBRP's estimates of reduced health care utilization and reduced spending, because higher cost-sharing levels tend to reduce utilization. However, individuals could also switch to plans with a lower deductible level, or insurer could offer different products in response to this change. 3)Support. This bill is sponsored by Health Access and supported by various labor, patient advocacy, and disease advocacy groups. 4)Opposition. The Chamber of Commerce opposes this bill, citing their position against bills that shift health care costs from one payer to another. The Chamber contends this bill would increase costs for employers for coverage of families. (In their projection of the most likely outcome of this bill, CHBRP found overall expenditures, including those by employers, would not increase but actually decrease.) 5)Previous Legislation. SB 639 (Ed Hernandez), Chapter 316, Statutes of 2013, codifies provisions of the ACA relating to out-of-pocket limits on cost-sharing. Analysis Prepared by:Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916) AB 1305 Page 5 319-2081