BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 1312


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:   April 20, 2015


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION


                                 Jim Frazier, Chair


          AB 1312  
          (O'Donnell) - As Amended April 15, 2015


          SUBJECT:  Ballast water management


          SUMMARY:  Delays the implementation of interim and final  
          performance standards for eliminating living organisms in ships'  
          discharged ballast water.  Specifically, this bill:  


          1)Deletes provisions requiring the person in charge of a vessel  
            to employ at least one of the specified ballast water  
            management practices.

          2)Requires the State Lands Commission (SLC) to adopt regulations  
            governing ballast water management practices for vessels  
            arriving at a California port from a port outside of the  
            Pacific Coast Region, as specified, and requires compliance  
            with these regulations.

          3)Changes the date, from 2016 to 2020, by which the SLC is  
            required to deem an approved experimental ballast water  
            treatment device to be in compliance with any future treatment  
            standard adopted.

          4)Changes the timing by which the person in charge of a vessel  
            capable of carrying ballast water, that visits a California  
            port, must submit ballast water reporting forms.  








                                                                    AB 1312


                                                                    Page  2






          5)Requires the person in charge of any vessel that has a ballast  
            water treatment system to submit a ballast water treatment  
            technology reporting form.  

          6)Deletes current law that requires only vessels that discharge  
            treated ballast in California to submit the ballast water  
            reporting forms.

          7)Delays implementation of interim performance standards for the  
            discharge of ballast water from a scheduled phase-in that  
            starts in 2016, to 2020 for all vessels. 

          8)Delays the implementation of the final performance standard  
            for the discharge of ballast water of zero detectable for all  
            organism size classes from January 1, 2020 to January 1, 2030.

          9)Requires the SLC in consultation with State Water Resources  
            Control Board, the United States Coast Guard, and others, to  
            prepare (or update) and submit to the Legislature, a review of  
            the results of ballast water treatment systems no less than 18  
            months before January 1, 2020 and January 1, 2030.

          10)Extends the authority of the SLC to collect specified samples  
            to ensure compliance with ballast water requirements to  
            include biofouling.   

          11)Expands the records that the person in charge of a vessel  
            subject to ballast water requirements must make available to  
            the SLC.

          12)Adds the management of biofouling on vessels to the  
            enforcement authority conferred upon the SLC. 

          13)Defines a variety of terms.

          14)Revises and recasts existing provisions and makes other  
            technical and conforming changes. 









                                                                    AB 1312


                                                                    Page  3





          EXISTING LAW:  


          1)Requires the master, owner, operator, or person in charge of a  
            vessel carrying, or capable of carrying, ballast water, that  
            operates in the waters of the state to take specified actions  
            to minimize the uptake and release of non-indigenous species.   


          2)Requires the SLC, if an owner or operator of a vessel applies  
            to install an experimental ballast water treatment system, and  
            the SLC approves that application on or before January 1,  
            2016, to deem the system in compliance with any future  
            treatment standard adopted, for a period not to exceed 5 years  
            from the date that the specified interim performance standards  
            would apply to that vessel.  

          3)Requires the SLC to adopt regulations, on or before January 1,  
            2008, that require an owner or operator of a vessel with  
            ballast water capacity that operates in the waters of the  
            state to implement an interim performance standard, beginning  
            in 2016, for the maximum allowable thresholds for living  
            organisms discharged in ballast water based on the size of the  
            organism, capacity of the ship's ballast water retention, and  
            the date of the ship's construction.  

          4)Requires the SLC to adopt regulations that require an owner or  
            operator of a vessel with ballast water capacity that operates  
            in the waters of the state to meet the final performance  
            standard for the discharge of ballast water of zero detectable  
            for all organism size classes by 2020.  


          FISCAL EFFECT:  Unknown


          COMMENTS:  AB 1312 delays implementation of California's ballast  
          water performance standards until 2020 to enable further  
          research and development of treatment technologies that can meet  








                                                                    AB 1312


                                                                    Page  4





          California's standards.  This delay also provides the SLC with  
          time to adopt compliance assessment regulations that will give  
          the shipping industry guidance on how conform to these  
          regulations.


          Non-indigenous aquatic plant and animal species can be  
          transported to new ecosystems and regions through human  
          activities.  According to the SLC, shipping is the most  
          significant vector for the transport and introduction of aquatic  
          non-indigenous species, contributing to 79.5% of established  
          aquatic non-indigenous species to North America and 74.1% across  
          the globe.  Once they are established, non-indigenous species  
          can cause ecological, economic, and human health problems in the  
          receiving environment.  


          Commercial ships transport organisms through two primary  
          vectors: vessel biofouling and ballast water.  Vessel biofouling  
          occurs when organisms attach to the hard surfaces of the vessel,  
          and are then transported to new environments that the vessel  
          enters.  Ballast water is sea water taken on, redistributed on,  
          and discharged from large seagoing vessels for functions related  
          to stability, maneuverability, and propulsion.  More than 7,000  
          species are estimated to be moved around the world on a daily  
          basis in ships' ballast water and each ballast water discharge  
          has the potential to release over 21.2 million individual  
          free-floating organisms.  


          The prevention of species introductions through the management  
          of human activities, such as requirements related to biofouling  
          and ballast water management, is considered the most protective  
          and cost-effective way to address the non-indigenous species  
          introduction.


          To prevent the introduction of aquatic species through ballast  
          water discharges, the Legislature enacted SB 497, (Simitian),  








                                                                    AB 1312


                                                                    Page  5





          Chapter 292, Statutes of 2006,  the Coastal Ecosystems  
          Protection Act (Act), which, among other things, required the  
          SLC, on or before January 1, 2008, to adopt regulations that  
          require an owner or operator of a vessel carrying, or capable of  
          carrying, ballast water that operates in the waters of the  
          state, to implement interim and final performance standards for  
          eradicating organisms in ballast water before it is discharged.   
          The interim performance standards, originally applied starting  
          in 2009, but through subsequent statutory changes now apply in  
          either 2016 or 2018, depending on the size of the organism, the  
          capacity of the ship's ballast water retention, and, the date of  
          the ship's construction.  The SLC adopted the interim  
          performance standards in 2007 and the Act set a final  
          performance standard for the discharge of ballast water of zero  
          detectable living organisms for all organism size classes by  
          2020.


          According to the SLC, vessels can comply with the California  
          performance standards through methods including retention of all  
          ballast water onboard the vessel (the most protective management  
          strategy available); discharge of ballast water to an approved  
          reception facility; or, use of a shipboard ballast water  
          treatment system.  While retention is the most protective  
          ballast water management strategy, not all vessels can retain  
          ballast water due to operational needs or safety concerns.  The  
          SLC reports that it conducted assessments of both shipboard and  
          shore-based ballast water treatment technologies in 2007, 2009,  
          2010 and 2013 (per a requirement of the Act), and found that no  
          ballast water treatment technologies were available at the time  
          to meet the California performance standards.  


          Because of the SLC's previous findings on the availability of  
          treatment technologies, the Legislature delayed the  
          implementation dates for ballast water interim performance  
          standards.  In 2008, the legislature delayed implementation for  
          new vessels with ballast water capacity of less than 5000 metric  
          tons from January 1, 2009, to January 1, 2010.  In 2013 it  








                                                                    AB 1312


                                                                    Page  6





          further delayed implementation for all vessels by an additional  
          two to six years depending on when the vessel was constructed  
          and the vessel's ballast water capacity.  This bill proposes to  
          delay the implementation of the interim performance standard to  
          2020, an eleven year delay from the earliest original  
          implementation date, and to delay the final performance standard  
          to 2026, a six year delay from the original implementation date.  
           


          Again in 2014, the SLC assessed and reported on the availability  
          of ballast water treatment technologies that can meet the  
          California ballast water discharge performance standards.  The  
          report reviewed both shore-based and shipboard methods of  
          treatment and found that shore-based treatment facilities able  
          to kill or remove organisms in ballast water currently still do  
          not exist in the United States.  The report also stated that  
          shipboard ballast water treatment systems have not demonstrated  
          the ability to meet the California performance standards.  The  
          SLC argues that the lack of options available to the shipping  
          industry with which to comply with California's performance  
          standards at this time is an obstacle to implementation of the  
          standards.


          The SLC found that shipboard ballast water treatment systems are  
          available for purchase from vendors.  However, they report that  
          no systems are available that have demonstrated the ability to  
          meet the California performance because no system has  
          demonstrated efficacy for all of the standards; there are no  
          suitable methods to analyze ballast water samples; and, there is  
          a lack of sampling and compliance protocols for determining  
          which systems can meet the standards.  The SLC states that they  
          are promulgating compliance assessment protocols, slated to be  
          adopted by January 1, 2017, which are intended to resolve the  
          questions about accurate testing procedures.  By promulgating  
          compliance assessment protocols in advance of the implementation  
          dates of the performance standards, industry will have years to  
          ensure systems under consideration will meet the standards.  








                                                                    AB 1312


                                                                    Page  7







          For shore-based ballast water reception and treatment  
          facilities, none specifically designed to receive and remove or  
          kill non-indigenous species in ballast water are currently  
          available in California or the U.S.  This is largely because  
          collaborative efforts among international, federal, and state  
          (including California) regulators and the shipping industry have  
          focused on the use of shipboard ballast water treatment systems  
          as the preferred method to enable compliance with state, federal  
          and international discharge standards.


          While the SLC and the author introduced this bill in order to  
          enable further development of treatment technologies, previous  
          delays of the standards have not resulted in the development of  
          these technologies.  



          Double referral:  This bill passed out of the Assembly  
          Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee on April 14,  
          2015, with a 7-0 vote.





          Previous legislation:  SB 814 (Committee on Natural Resources  
          and Water), Chapter 472, Statutes of 2013, delayed  
          implementation of ballast water performance standards for  
          vessels that carry, or are capable of carrying, ballast water  
          into the state by two to six years, depending on when the ship  
          was constructed and the vessel's ballast water capacity.

          SB 935 (Committee on Environmental Quality), Chapter 550,  
          Statutes of 2012, delayed the date for which the SLC must  
          approve a vessel operator's application to install an  
          experimental ballast water treatment from January 2008 to  








                                                                    AB 1312


                                                                    Page  8





          January 2016.

          SB 1781(Committee on Environmental Quality), Chapter 696,  
          Statutes of 2008, delayed implementation of ballast water  
          performance standards for new vessels with ballast water  
          capacity less than 5000 metric tons from January 1, 2009, to  
          January 1, 2010.

          SB 497 (Simitian), Chapter 292, Statutes of 2006, enacted the  
          Coastal Ecosystems Protection Act, which established interim and  
          final performance standards for the discharge of ballast water  
          from large commercial ships, required interim standards, which  
          identified a range of thresholds for living organisms by class  
          size, to begin to take effect January 1, 2009, and required the  
          final standards, a "zero detectable living organisms" standard  
          for all organism size classes, to take effect January 1, 2020.

          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:




          Support


          State Lands Commission (Sponsor)


          California Association of Port Authorities


          Cruise Lines International Association, Inc.


          Maersk, Inc.


          Pacific Merchant Shipping Association 









                                                                    AB 1312


                                                                    Page  9








          Opposition


          None on file




          Analysis Prepared by:Victoria Alvarez / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093