BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 1315


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  May 20, 2015


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                                 Jimmy Gomez, Chair


          AB  
          1315 (Alejo) - As Amended April 21, 2015


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Local Government               |Vote:|9 - 0        |
          |Committee:   |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  YesReimbursable:   
          Yes


          SUMMARY:


          This bill prohibits public agencies from delegating to a  
          contractor the development of a storm water pollution prevention  
          plan (SWPPP), water pollution control program, or any other plan  








                                                                    AB 1315


                                                                    Page  2





          required by a Regional Board to prevent or reduce water  
          pollution or runoff on a public works project.  This bill also  
          prohibits public agencies from requiring a contractor, on a  
          public works contract that includes compliance with any of these  
          plans, to assume responsibility for the completeness and  
          accuracy of the plan developed by that entity.  


          FISCAL EFFECT:


          Unknown, but likely major, on-going reimbursable state mandated  
          costs for local agencies to develop SWPPPs.


          COMMENTS:


          1)Purpose. According to the author, "Although the Permit  
            allocates SWPPP design responsibility to project owners -  
            including the corresponding risk of penalties for design  
            defects - many owners attempt to transfer design  
            responsibility/risk to their contractors.  This is done  
            through broad contractual indemnity provisions and design-risk  
            shifting requirements... As a result, contractors are forced  
            to hire a design firm to design the SWPPP/act as [qualified  
            SWPPP developer] QSD, and often attempt to transfer the risk  
            of penalties down to their subcontractors through similarly  
            broad subcontract indemnity provisions?This shift in  
            responsibility undermines the intent of the Permit, results in  
            an inefficient allocation of responsibility and risk; and is  
            contrary to several existing laws."


          2)Background. A SWPPP is a comprehensive, detailed,  
            site-specific, written document that identifies potential  
            sources of stormwater pollution on a construction site;  
            describes stormwater control measures and Best Management  
            Practices (BMPs) that will be used to reduce or eliminate  








                                                                    AB 1315


                                                                    Page  3





            pollutants in stormwater discharges from the project site; and  
            identifies the procedures the operator of the project site  
            will implement to comply with the terms and conditions of the  
            Permit.


            In order for a construction site to remain in compliance with  
            the Clean Water Act's NPDES permitting program, a SWPPP must  
            be developed and maintained throughout the construction  
            project's entirety.  As the project progresses and goes  
            through changes, the SWPPP must be revised to reflect those  
            changes. A project's SWPPP may be furnished by the project  
            owner or prepared by a contractor's SWPPP developer. The  
            Permit is typically held in the name of the property owner.  


          3)State Water Board. According to staff at the State Water  
            Board, the practice of delegating development of an SWPPP to  
            the contractor is neither new nor unusual.  This is frequently  
            the practice they see in construction projects that must  
            obtain a Permit and develop an SWPPP.  They note that the  
            discharger, or the responsible party for the Permit, is named  
            on the Permit and is always the owner/agency, not the  
            contractor.  Thus, responsibility for compliance with the  
            Permit remains with the owner/agency, regardless of which  
            party develops the SWPPP.  



            Water Board staff also asserts that most municipalities don't  
            have the expertise to develop SWPPPs and don't have the  
            resources to retain QSDs on staff.  QSDs are typically  
            employed by environmental consulting firms that perform the  
            work of developing SWPPPs under contract, either with a  
            contractor (which is more common), or with the owner/agency.   
            (Some large contracting firms keep QSDs on staff, but many  
            smaller firms don't have the resources to do so.)










                                                                    AB 1315


                                                                    Page  4








          4)Arguments in Support.  Supporters, primarily contractors and  
            industry organizations, write, "AB 1315 clarifies that public  
            owners are responsible for the preparation of Storm water  
            Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) required on public works  
            projects and prohibits public owners from delegating  
            responsibility to contractors or forcing contractors to assume  
            responsibility for SWPPP design. 



            "Local agencies have begun requiring contractors to prepare  
            the state required storm water plan and submit it as part of  
            the bid.  At this point the contractor or subcontractor cannot  
            price the storm water plan because it hasn't been designed yet  
            - so the result is the contractor or subcontractor is forced  
            to estimate the cost of implementing a storm water plan - and  
            include that cost into a bid - even before the plan has been  
            designed."





          5)Arguments in Opposition.  Opponents, primarily cities,  
            counties, and other local agencies, state, "SWPPPs are  
            currently created in accordance with the general contractor's  
            construction plans.  As construction progresses, SWPPPs must  
            often be modified to accommodate the constantly changing  
            conditions of a construction site.  The general contractor is  
            in the best position to create the construction plan and  
            contract for the corresponding SWPPP.  A general  
            contractor-developed SWPPP can incorporate an optimal  
            construction sequence selected by the contractor, thereby  
            maximizing efficiency and reducing costs.  A separate entity  
            developing a SWPPP would have to assume a sequence of work  
            that might occur under one construction scenario but not  








                                                                    AB 1315


                                                                    Page  5





            another.



            "AB 1315 would turn this standing process on its head by  
            prohibiting public agencies from contracting with the general  
            contractor to develop a SWPPP and statutorily restricting  
            their remaining options to an engineer or architect.  Public  
            agencies, engineers and architects simply do not have the  
            direct control over the day-to-day construction, let alone the  
            expertise, to perform this function."





          


          Analysis Prepared by:Jennifer Swenson / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081