AB 1328, as amended, Weber. Criminal procedure: withholding of evidence.
Existing law requires the prosecuting attorney to disclose to the defendant or his or her attorney certain materials and information, including statements of all defendants and any exculpatory evidence, as specified. Existing law authorizes a court to grant a motion to disqualify a district attorney from performing an authorized duty, subject to specified procedural requirements.
This bill wouldbegin delete requireend deletebegin insert authorizeend insert a court,begin delete if the court
determines thatend deletebegin insert upon receiving information thatend insert the prosecuting attorney has deliberately and intentionally withheld relevantbegin insert or materialend insert exculpatorybegin delete materialsend deletebegin insert evidenceend insert or information in violation of law,begin insert to make a finding, supported by clear and convincing evidence, that a violation occurred. If the court makes such a finding, the bill would require the courtend insert to inform the State Bar of California of that violation if the prosecuting attorney acted in bad faith and the impact of the withholding
contributed to a guilty verdict, guilty or nolo contendere plea, or, if identified before conclusion of trial, seriously limited the ability of a defendant to present a defense. The bill would authorize a court to disqualify an individual prosecuting attorney from a case if the courtbegin delete determines that the prosecuting attorney deliberately and intentionally withheld relevant exculpatory materials or information in that case in violation of law and that the prosecuting attorney acted in bad faith.end deletebegin insert finds that a violation occurred in bad faith.end insert The bill would alsobegin delete authorize a courtend deletebegin insert authorize, upon a determination by a court to disqualify an individual
prosecuting attorney from a case, the defendant or his or her counsel to file and serve a notice of a motionend insert to disqualify the prosecuting attorney’s office if there is sufficient evidence that other employees of the prosecuting attorney’s office knowinglybegin insert and in bad faithend insert participated in or sanctioned the intentional withholding of the relevantbegin insert or materialend insert exculpatorybegin delete materialsend deletebegin insert evidenceend insert or information and that withholding is part of a pattern and practice of violations. The bill would specify that its provisions do not limit the authority or discretionbegin delete ofend deletebegin insert
of, or any requirement placed upon,end insert the court or other individuals to make reports to the State Bar of California regarding the same conduct, or otherwise limit other available legal authority,begin insert requirements,end insert remedies, or actions.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
begin insertSection 6086.7 of the end insertbegin insertBusiness and Professions
2Codeend insertbegin insert is amended to read:end insert
(a) A court shall notify the State Bar of any of the
4following:
5(1) A final order of contempt imposed against an attorney that
6may involve grounds warranting discipline under this chapter. The
7court entering the final order shall transmit to the State Bar a copy
8of the relevant minutes, final order, and transcript, if one exists.
9(2) Whenever a modification or reversal of a judgment in a
10judicial proceeding is based in whole or in part on the misconduct,
11incompetent representation, or willful misrepresentation of an
12attorney.
13(3) The imposition of any judicial sanctions against an attorney,
14
except sanctions for failure to make discovery or monetary
15sanctions of less than one thousand dollars ($1,000).
P3 1(4) The imposition of any civil penalty upon an attorney pursuant
2to Section 8620 of the Family Code.
3(5) A violation described in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of
4Section 1424.5 of the Penal Code by a prosecuting attorney, if the
5court finds that the prosecuting attorney acted in bad faith and
6the impact of the violation contributed to a guilty verdict, guilty
7or nolo contendere plea, or, if identified before conclusion of trial,
8seriously limited the ability of a defendant to present a defense.
9(b) In the event of a notification made under subdivision (a) the
10court shall also notify the attorney
involved that the matter has
11been referred to the State Bar.
12(c) The State Bar shall investigate any matter reported under
13this section as to the appropriateness of initiating disciplinary
14action against the attorney.
Section 1424.5 is added to the Penal Code, immediately
17following Section 1424, to read:
(a) (1) begin deleteIf a court determines end deletebegin insertUpon receiving
19information end insertthat a prosecuting attorneybegin delete hasend deletebegin insert may haveend insert deliberately
20and intentionally withheld relevantbegin insert or materialend insert exculpatory
21begin delete materialsend deletebegin insert
evidenceend insert or information in violation of law,begin insert
a court may
22make a finding, supported by clear and convincing evidence, that
23a violation occurred. If the court finds such a violation,end insert the court
24shall inform the State Bar of California of that violation if the
25prosecuting attorney acted in bad faith and the impact of the
26withholding contributed to a guilty verdict, guilty or nolo
27contendere plea, or, if identified before conclusion of trial, seriously
28limited the ability of a defendant to present a defense.
29(2) Abegin insert court may hold aend insert hearing to consider whether a
30begin delete prosecuting attorney or his or her office should be disqualifiedend delete
31begin insert
violation occurredend insert
pursuant tobegin delete this section shall be initiated only begin insert paragraph (1).end insert
32upon the court’s own motion.end delete
33(b) (1) begin deleteUpon its own motion, a end deletebegin insertIf a court finds, pursuant to
34subdivision (a), that a violation occurred in bad faith, the end insertcourt
35may disqualify an individual prosecuting attorney from abegin delete case if begin insert
case.end insert
36the court determines that the prosecuting attorney deliberately and
37intentionally withheld relevant exculpatory materials or information
38in that case in violation of law and that the prosecuting attorney
39acted in bad faith.end delete
P4 1(2) begin deleteThe court may also end deletebegin insertUpon a determination by a court to
2disqualify an individual prosecuting attorney pursuant to
3paragraph (1), the defendant or his or her counsel may file and
4serve a notice of a motion pursuant to Section 1424 to end insertdisqualify
5the prosecuting attorney’s office if there is sufficient evidence that
6other employees of the prosecuting attorney’s office knowingly
7begin insert and in bad faithend insert participated in or sanctioned the intentional
8withholding of the relevantbegin insert or materialend insert
exculpatorybegin delete materialsend delete
9begin insert
evidenceend insert or information and that withholding is part of a pattern
10and practice of violations.
11(c) This section does not limit the authority or discretionbegin delete ofend deletebegin insert of,
12or any requirement placed upon,end insert the court or other individuals to
13make reports to the State Bar of California regarding the same
14conduct, or otherwise limit other available legal authority,
15begin insert requirements,end insert remedies, or actions.
O
97