BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó






           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       AB 1347|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 1347
          Author:   Chiu (D)
          Amended:  9/1/15 in Senate
          Vote:     21  

           SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE:  7-0, 6/30/15
           AYES:  Jackson, Moorlach, Anderson, Hertzberg, Leno, Monning,  
            Wieckowski

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE:  7-0, 8/27/15
           AYES:  Lara, Bates, Beall, Hill, Leyva, Mendoza, Nielsen

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  76-0, 6/3/15 - See last page for vote

           SUBJECT:   Public contracts:  claims


          SOURCE:    California Chapters of the National Electrical  
                      Contractors Association
                      California-Nevada Conference of Operating Engineers
                      California State Council of Laborers
                      State Building and Construction Trades Council of  
                     California
                      United Contractors
          
          DIGEST:   This bill, until January 1, 2019, establishes, for  
          public works contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2016,  
          a claim resolution procedure by which a general contractor can  
          seek public agency review of the claim.  This bill also  
          prescribes a procedure by which a subcontractor or lower tier  
          contractor may make a claim against the public agency through  
          the general contractor. 









                                                                    AB 1347  
                                                                    Page  2


          ANALYSIS:

          Existing law:

            1)  Provides that, in the event that a dispute arises between  
              the local public entity and the contractor whether the  
              conditions materially differ, or involve hazardous waste, or  
              cause a decrease or increase in the contractor's cost of, or  
              time required for, performance of any part of the work, the  
              contractor is not excused from any scheduled completion date  
              provided for by the contract.

            2)  Provides that the contractor retains any and all rights  
              provided either by contract or by law which pertain to the  
              resolution of disputes and protests between the contracting  
              parties. 

            3)  Authorizes public agencies to make changes in construction  
              contracts for public improvements in the course of  
              construction, and requires the contractor to be paid for the  
              changes in accordance with the provisions of the contract  
              governing payment for changes in the work.

            4)  Authorizes, pursuant to contract terms and by mutual  
              consent of the contracting parties, any public agency to  
              terminate, amend, or modify any contract within the scope of  
              such authority; however, this provision does not apply to  
              contracts entered into pursuant to any statute expressly  
              requiring that contracts be let or awarded on the basis of  
              competitive bids.

            5)  Prohibits, except as otherwise provided, a suit for money  
              or damages against a public entity on a cause of action for  
              which a claim is required to be presented until a written  
              claim therefor has been presented to the public entity and  
              has been acted upon or rejected by the board.

            6)  Prescribes a contract claims resolution process for  
              contracts entered into with a state agency and requires  
              arbitration of a claim, defined to mean a demand for  
              monetary compensation or damages, arising under or relating  
              to the performance of contracts with a state agency. 

            7)  Authorizes a claimant to initiate arbitration no later  







                                                                    AB 1347  
                                                                    Page  3


              than 90 days after the date of personal or mail service on  
              the claimant of the final written decision by the  
              appropriate public agency department (department) on the  
              claim; however, this limitation does not apply to any claim  
              founded on any cost audit, latent defect, warranty, or  
              guarantee under the contract.

            8)  Prohibits arbitration until the claimant pursues  
              diligently and exhausts, as to the claim, the required  
              administrative procedures set forth in the contract under  
              which the claim arose, as specified.

            9)  Authorizes a party to the contract to join in the  
              arbitration as a party, any supplier, subcontractor, design  
              professional, surety, or other person who has so agreed and  
              if the joinder is necessary to prevent a substantial risk of  
              the party otherwise being subjected to inconsistent  
              obligations or decisions.

          This bill:
           
             1)  Precludes, until January 1, 2019,  any other claim  
              resolution provision, applies to all claims by contractors  
              in connection with public works, and applies to a state  
              agency, department, office, division, bureau, board, or  
              commission, the California State University, the University  
              of California, a city, including a charter city, county,  
              including a charter county, city and county, including a  
              charter city and county, district, special district, public  
              authority, political subdivision, public corporation, or  
              nonprofit transit corporation wholly owned by a public  
              agency and formed to carry out the purposes of the public  
              agency.

            2)  Requires, upon receipt of a claim, the public entity to  
              which the claim applies to conduct a reasonable review of  
              the claim and, within a period not to exceed 45 days,  
              provide the claimant a written statement identifying what  
              portion of the claim is disputed and what portion is  
              undisputed.

            3)  Requires the claimant to furnish reasonable documentation  
              to support the claim, and provides, if the public entity  
              needs approval from its governing body to provide the  







                                                                    AB 1347  
                                                                    Page  4


              claimant a written statement identifying the disputed  
              portion and the undisputed portion of the claim, and the  
              governing body does not meet within the 45 days following  
              receipt of a claim or within a mutually agreed to extension  
              of time, the public agency up to three days following the  
              next duly publicly noticed meeting of the governing body  
              after the 45-day period, or extension, expires to provide  
              the claimant a written statement identifying the disputed  
              portion and the undisputed portion.

            4)  Requires any payment due on an undisputed portion of the  
              claim to be processed and made within 60 days after the  
              public entity issues its written statement; if the public  
              entity fails to issue a written statement, the claim would  
              be deemed rejected in its entirety.

            5)  Authorizes, if the claimant disputes the public entity's  
              written response, or if the public entity fails to respond  
              to a claim issued within the time prescribed, the claimant  
              to demand in writing an informal conference to meet and  
              confer for settlement of the issues in dispute, and, upon  
              receipt of a demand in writing, the public entity would be  
              required to schedule a meet and confer conference within 30  
              days for settlement of the dispute.

            6)  Requires, within 10 business days following the conclusion  
              of the meet and confer conference, if the claim or any  
              portion of the claim remains in dispute, the public entity  
              to provide the claimant a written statement identifying the  
              portion of the claim that remains in dispute and the portion  
              that is undisputed. 

            7)  Requires any payment due on an undisputed portion of the  
              claim to be processed and made within 60 days after the  
              public entity issues its written statement, and requires any  
              disputed portion of the claim, as identified by the  
              contractor in writing, to be submitted to nonbinding  
              mediation, with the public entity and the claimant sharing  
              the associated costs equally. 

            8)  Requires the public entity and claimant to mutually agree  
              to a mediator within 10 business days after the disputed  
              portion of the claim has been identified in writing, and, if  
              the parties cannot agree upon a mediator, each party would  







                                                                    AB 1347  
                                                                    Page  5


              select a mediator and those mediators would select a  
              qualified neutral third party to mediate with regard to the  
              disputed portion of the claim. 

            9)  Requires each party to bear the fees and costs charged by  
              its respective mediator in connection with the selection of  
              the neutral mediator, and if mediation is unsuccessful, the  
              parts of the claim remaining in dispute would be subject to  
              other applicable claim resolution procedures.

            10) Specifies that mediation includes any nonbinding process,  
              such as neutral evaluation or a dispute review board, in  
              which an independent third party or board assists the  
              parties in dispute resolution through negotiation or by  
              issuance of an evaluation, and any mediation utilized shall  
              conform to the time frames provided in this bill.

            11) Requires, unless otherwise agreed to by the public entity  
              and the contractor in writing, the mediation conducted  
              pursuant to this bill to excuse any further obligation to  
              mediate (meet and confer) after litigation has been  
              commenced.

            12) Does not preclude a public entity from requiring  
              arbitration of disputes under private arbitration or the  
              Public Works Contract Arbitration Program, if mediation does  
              not resolve the parties' dispute.

            13) Specifies that failure by the public entity to respond to  
              a claim from a contractor within the time periods described  
              would result in the claim being deemed rejected in its  
              entirety, and a claim denied by reason of the public  
              entity's failure to have responded to a claim, or its  
              failure to otherwise meet the time requirements, do not  
              constitute an adverse finding with regard to the merits of  
              the claim or the responsibility or qualifications of the  
              claimant.

            14) Authorizes, if a subcontractor or a lower tier  
              subcontractor lacks legal standing to assert a claim against  
              a public entity because privity of contract does not exist,  
              the contractor to present to the public entity a claim on  
              behalf of a subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor. 








                                                                    AB 1347  
                                                                    Page  6


            15) Authorizes a subcontractor to request in writing, either  
              on his or her own behalf or on behalf of a lower tier  
              subcontractor, that the contractor present a claim for work  
              which was performed by the subcontractor or by a lower tier  
              subcontractor on behalf of the subcontractor. 

            16) Requires the subcontractor requesting that the claim be  
              presented to the public entity to furnish reasonable  
              documentation to support the claim, and requires, within 45  
              days of receipt of that written request, the contractor to  
              notify the subcontractor in writing as to whether the  
              contractor presented the claim to the public entity and, if  
              the original contractor did not present the claim, provide  
              the subcontractor with a statement of the reasons for not  
              having done so. 

            17) Requires the text of the provisions provided under this  
              bill or a summary of it to be set forth in the plans or  
              specifications for any public works project that may give  
              rise to a claim under this bill.

            18) Makes a waiver of the rights granted by this bill void and  
              contrary to public policy, as specified, and only applies to  
              contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2016. 

          Background



          In general, public works refers to construction, alteration,  
          demolition, installation, or repair work (including maintenance)  
          of any public structure, building, road, or other improvement  
          done under contract and paid by public funds, or if private  
          funds are used, more than 50 percent of the square footage is  
          leased to a public entity.  Because of this, there are laws  
          regarding many aspects of the construction projects to protect  
          the public's interest.  Public works projects do not include  
          those done by a public agency with its own employees.

          On public works projects, a public agency contracts with a  
          general contractor, who has submitted a bid or estimated cost to  
          provide the materials and services for the construction,  
          alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work.  If the  
          cost of the materials and services is more than the general  







                                                                    AB 1347  
                                                                    Page  7


          contractor's bid due to changes in the project, which may be  
          attributed to inaccurate or incomplete project plans and  
          specifications, the public agency orders extra work to be  
          performed, or unexpected difficulties arise.  These increases in  
          costs may be submitted to the public agency for payment.   
          Typically, unless a change order is issued by the public agency  
          or its legislative body or appropriate department approving the  
          increase in cost, the general contractor, who may not be  
          responsible for the underlying cause of the increase in costs  
          but has accrued the expense for the sake of completing the  
          project, will be unable to resolve a claim dispute outside of  
          arbitration or civil action.  Further, a subcontractor, who has  
          performed additional services or provided materials outside the  
          scope of the original contract with the general contractor but  
          necessary to the completion of the project, may be seeking  
          payment from the public agency.  Multiple legislative attempts  
          to address pre-litigation claim disputes have failed.


          Comments


          The author writes:

             There is no law in place requiring agencies to pay claims, in  
             a timely manner, made by contractors for extra work performed  
             and approved by the agency, even when the public agency  
             acknowledges that it owes the contractor for work performed.   
             This places contractors and their workers in difficult  
             financial circumstances. 

             Furthermore, there is a lack in uniformity for disputing a  
             claim.  In many cases, some public agencies have no  
             requirements to respond to a claim or respond to a claim in a  
             timely manner.  The breakdown of communication between the  
             public agency and the contractor adds to the burden on the  
             contractor and meeting their payroll obligations. 

             AB 1347 creates a process that requires agencies to respond  
             to a contractor's claim, to pay out portions of the work they  
             acknowledge and agree they owe the contractor, and to resolve  
             disputed portions of payment through non-binding mediation.

          Prior Legislation







                                                                    AB 1347  
                                                                    Page  8




          AB 2471 (Frazier, 2014), which died in the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee, would have required state and local public entities  
          engaged in a public works contract awarded to the lowest bidder  
          to promptly issue change orders when extra work is required of  
          the contractor or subcontractor.  

          AB 2096 (Miller, 2010) and AB 541 (Duvall, 2009), which both  
          died in the Assembly Judiciary Committee, would have allowed a  
          public agency and a contractor to mutually agree to resolve a  
          claim through independent arbitration.

          AB 216 (Beall, 2009), which was held under submission in the  
          Assembly Appropriations Committee, would have reformed  
          pre-litigation claims resolution procedures for local public  
          works projects.  

          FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:    No          Fiscal  
          Com.:YesLocal:   Yes

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, this bill  
          creates major costs potentially in the millions of dollars  
          (General Fund) to numerous state agencies engaged in significant  
          public works contracts.  Caltrans expects it would need  
          additional personnel at an annual cost of approximately $11.5  
          million. Other agencies significantly impacted include the  
          Departments of General Services, Water Resources, Corrections  
          and Rehabilitation, the University of California, and the  
          California State University.  This bill potentially creates  
          major state-reimbursable costs in the tens of millions of  
          dollars (General Fund) to local agencies engaged in public works  
          projects, including any increase in administrative costs  
          incurred under the existing process for resolution of claims  
          under $375,000.  Further, this bill may result in additional  
          costs to state and local agencies for additional interest costs  
          accrued on late payments. 


          SUPPORT:   (Verified8/28/15)


          California Chapters of the National Electrical Contractors  
          Association (co-source)







                                                                    AB 1347  
                                                                    Page  9


          California-Nevada Conference of Operating Engineers (co-source)
          California State Council of Laborers (co-source)
          State Building and Construction Trades Council of California  
          (co-source)
          United Contractors (co-source)
          Air Conditioning Sheet Metal Association
          Air-Conditioning & Refrigeration Contractors Association
          Associated General Contractors
          Associated General Contractors, California Chapters
          Associated Plumbing & Mechanical Contractors
          California Association of Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning  
          Contractors' National Association
          California Landscape & Irrigation Council
          California Legislative Conference of the Plumbing, Heating and  
          Piping Industry
          California Plumbing and Mechanical Contractors Association
          California State Association of Electrical Workers
          California State Pipe Trades Council
          Finishing Contractors Association of Southern California
          Northern California Mechanical Contractors Association
          Small Business California
          Southern California Contractors Association
          Union Roofing Contractors Association
          Wall and Ceiling Alliance
          Western States Council of Sheet Metal Workers


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified8/28/15)


          California Chapters of the American Public Works Association
          California School Boards Association
          City of Camarillo
          City of Indian Wells
          City of San Carlos
          Port of Long Beach
          Santa Clara Valley Water District

          ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  76-0, 6/3/15
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom,  
            Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang,  
            Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle,  
            Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Cristina Garcia,  
            Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray,  







                                                                    AB 1347  
                                                                    Page  10


            Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones,  
            Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis,  
            McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte,  
            O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Rendon,  
            Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark  
            Stone, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood,  
            Atkins
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Gallagher, Jones-Sawyer, Mayes, Thurmond

          Prepared by:Tara Welch / JUD. / (916) 651-4113
          9/1/15 20:25:12


                                   ****  END  ****