BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                      AB 1351


                                                                      Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          1351 (Eggman)


          As Amended  June 1, 2015


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Committee       |Votes |Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |      |                      |                    |
          |                |      |                      |                    |
          |----------------+------+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Public Safety   |5-2   |Quirk, Jones-Sawyer,  |Melendez, Lackey    |
          |                |      |Low, Santiago,        |                    |
          |                |      |Thurmond              |                    |
          |                |      |                      |                    |
          |----------------+------+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |12-5  |Gomez, Bonta,         |Bigelow, Chang,     |
          |                |      |Calderon, Daly,       |Gallagher, Jones,   |
          |                |      |Eggman, Eduardo       |Wagner              |
          |                |      |Garcia, Gordon,       |                    |
          |                |      |Holden, Quirk,        |                    |
          |                |      |Rendon, Weber, Wood   |                    |
          |                |      |                      |                    |
          |                |      |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 


          SUMMARY:  Changes the existing deferred entry of judgment (DEJ)  
          program for specified offenses involving personal use or  
          possession of controlled substances into a pretrial drug diversion  
          program.  Specifically, this bill:  
          1)Requires, to be eligible for diversion, the defendant must not  








                                                                      AB 1351


                                                                      Page  2





            have a prior conviction for any offense involving a controlled  
            substance other than the offenses that may be diverted as  
            specified; the offense charged must not have involved a crime of  
            violence or threatened violence; there must be no evidence of a  
            violation relating to narcotics or restricted dangerous drugs  
            other than a violation of an offense that may be diverted; and  
            the defendant must not have any prior convictions within five  
            years prior to the alleged commission of the charged offense for  
            a serious or violent felony, as defined.
          2)Provides that a defendant's participation in pretrial diversion  
            shall not constitute a conviction or an admission of guilt in  
            any action or proceeding.


          3)States if the court determines that it is appropriate, the court  
            shall grant pretrial diversion if the defendant pleads not  
            guilty to the charge or charges and waives the right to a speedy  
            trial and to a speedy preliminary hearing, if applicable.


          4)Changes the minimum time allowed prior to dismissal of the case  
            from 18 months to six months, and the maximum time the  
            proceedings in the case can be suspended from three years to one  
            year.


          5)States that a defendant may request, and the court shall grant,  
            for good cause shown, an extension of time to complete the  
            program.


          6)Provides that if it appears to the prosecuting attorney, the  
            court, or the probation department that the defendant is  
            performing unsatisfactorily in the assigned program, or that the  
            defendant is convicted of an offense that reflects the  
            defendant's propensity for violence, or the defendant is  
            convicted of a felony, the prosecuting attorney, the court on  
            its own, or the probation department may make a motion for  
            termination of pre-trial diversion.








                                                                      AB 1351


                                                                      Page  3







          7)Provides that if the court finds that the defendant is not  
            performing satisfactorily in the assigned program, or the court  
            finds that the defendant has been convicted of a specified type  
            of crime, the court shall reinstate the criminal charge or  
            charges and schedule the matter for further proceedings.


          8)States if the defendant has completed pretrial diversion, at the  
            end of that period, the criminal charge or charges shall be  
            dismissed.  Upon successful completion of a pretrial diversion  
            program, the arrest upon which the defendant was diverted shall  
            be deemed to have never occurred.


          9)States that a person participating in a pretrial diversion  
            program or a preguilty plea program shall be allowed, under the  
            direction of a licensed health care practitioner, to use  
            medications to treat substance use disorders if the participant  
            allows release of his or her medical records to the court for  
            the limited purpose of determining whether or not the  
            participant is using such medications under the direction of a  
            licensed health care practitioner and is in compliance with the  
            pretrial diversion or preguilty plea program rules.


          EXISTING LAW:  


          1)Provides that a defendant may qualify for DEJ of specified  
            non-violent drug possession offenses if the following apply to  
            the defendant:
             a)   The defendant has no prior conviction for any offense  
               involving controlled substances;
             b)   The offense charged did not involve a crime of violence or  
               threatened violence;










                                                                      AB 1351


                                                                      Page  4





             c)   There is no evidence of a violation relating to narcotics  
               or restricted dangerous drugs other than a violation of the  
               specified deferrable drug offenses;


             d)   The defendant's record does not indicate that probation or  
               parole has ever been revoked without thereafter being  
               completed;


             e)   The defendant's record does not indicate that he or she  
               has successfully completed or been terminated from diversion  
               or DEJ pursuant to this chapter within five years prior to  
               the alleged commission of the charged offense;


             f)   The defendant has no prior felony conviction within five  
               years prior to the alleged commission of the charged offense.  
                


          2)Specifies the offenses that are eligible for DEJ, which include  
            possession for personal use of specified controlled substances,  
            possession of certain drug paraphernalia, being under the  
            influence of a controlled substance, cultivation of marijuana  
            for personal use, and being present in a place where controlled  
            substances are being used.  
          3)States a prosecutor has a duty to review files to decide whether  
            the defendant is eligible for DEJ.  The prosecuting attorney  
            shall file with the court a declaration in writing or state for  
            the record the grounds upon which the determination is based,  
            and shall make this information available to the defendant and  
            his or her attorney.  This procedure is intended to allow the  
            court to set the hearing for DEJ at the arraignment. 


          4)Requires all referrals for DEJ granted by the court pursuant to  
            this chapter to be made only to programs that have been  
            certified by the county drug program administrator, or to  








                                                                      AB 1351


                                                                      Page  5





            programs that provide services at no cost to the participant and  
            have been deemed by the court and the county drug program  
            administrator to be credible and effective.  The defendant may  
            request to be referred to a program in any county, as long as  
            that program meets the criteria specified.  


          5)Provides that the court shall hold a hearing and, after  
            consideration of any information relevant to its decision, shall  
            determine if the defendant consents to further proceedings and  
            if the defendant should be granted DEJ.  If the court does not  
            deem the defendant a person who would be benefited by DEJ, or if  
            the defendant does not consent to participate, the proceedings  
            shall continue as in any other case.  The period during which  
            DEJ is granted shall be for no less than 18 months nor longer  
            than three years.  Progress reports shall be filed by the  
            probation department with the court as directed by the court.  


          6)Requires, if the defendant has performed satisfactorily during  
            the period in which DEJ was granted, at the end of that period,  
            the criminal charge or charges to be dismissed.  If the  
            defendant does not perform satisfactorily, DEJ may be terminated  
            and the defendant may be sentenced as he or she would for a  
            conviction.  


          7)States that upon successful completion of a DEJ program, the  
            arrest upon which the judgment was deferred shall be deemed to  
            have never occurred.  The defendant may indicate in response to  
            any question concerning his or her prior criminal record that he  
            or she was not arrested or granted DEJ for the offense, except  
            as specified for employment as a peace officer.  A record  
            pertaining to an arrest resulting in successful completion of a  
            DEJ program shall not, without the defendant's consent, be used  
            in any way that could result in the denial of any employment,  
            benefit, license, or certificate.  










                                                                      AB 1351


                                                                      Page  6





          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, minor absorbable costs to the trial courts.


          COMMENTS:  According to the author, "This bill seeks to limit  
          harsh consequences to immigrants by changing the current process  
          for nonviolent, misdemeanor drug offenses from DEJ to pretrial  
          diversion.  While the current DEJ process eliminates a conviction  
          if a defendant successfully completes DEJ, the defendant may still  
          face federal consequences, including deportation if the defendant  
          is undocumented, or the prohibition from becoming a United States  
          (U.S.) citizen if the defendant is a legal permanent resident.   
          This is systemic injustice to immigrants in this country, but even  
          U.S. citizens may face federal consequences, including loss of  
          federal housing and educational benefits.


          "Given that President Obama has publicly called for immigration  
          officials to focus on violent, dangerous felons, this bill will  
          have a profoundly positive impact on more than $2 million  
          undocumented immigrants and the more than 3 million legal  
          permanent residents living in California by eliminating the  
          draconian consequences faced by immigrants who participate in  
          diversion programs in good faith.  This bill will keep families  
          together, help people retain eligibility for U.S. citizenship, and  
          also preserve access to other benefits for those who qualify."


          Analysis Prepared by:                                               
                          Stella Choe / PUB. S. / (916) 319-3744  FN:  
          0000740
















                                                                      AB 1351


                                                                      Page  7