BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



          SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                             Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair
                            2015 - 2016  Regular  Session

          AB 1352 (Eggman) - Deferred entry of judgment:  withdrawal of  
          plea
          
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |                                                                 |
          |                                                                 |
          |                                                                 |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Version: May 19, 2015           |Policy Vote: PUB. S. 5 - 2      |
          |                                |                                |
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Urgency: No                     |Mandate: No                     |
          |                                |                                |
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Hearing Date: August 17, 2015   |Consultant: Jolie Onodera       |
          |                                |                                |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.




          Bill  
          Summary:  AB 1352 would require a court to allow a defendant who  
          was granted deferred entry of judgment (DEJ) on or after January  
          1, 1997, after pleading guilty or nolo contendere to the charged  
          offense, to obtain dismissal of the plea upon which the DEJ was  
          granted if the defendant performed satisfactorily during the DEJ  
          period and the defendant attests that the plea may result in the  
          denial or loss of any employment, benefit, license, or  
          certificate, as specified. 


          Fiscal  
          Impact:  Potentially significant increase in trial court costs  
          (General Fund*) for new petitions to dismiss pleas of guilty and  
          nolo contendere submitted for cases granted DEJ retroactive to  
          January 1, 1997.








          AB 1352 (Eggman)                                       Page 1 of  
          ?
          
          
          *Trial Court Trust Fund


          Background:  Existing law provides that a defendant may qualify for DEJ of  
          specified non-violent drug possession offenses subject to the  
          following criteria: 
                 The defendant has no prior convictions for any offense  
               involving controlled substances.
                 The offense charged did not involve a crime of violence  
               or threatened violence. 
                 There is no evidence of a violation relating to  
               narcotics or restricted dangerous drugs other than a  
               violation of the specified deferrable drug offenses.
                 The defendant's record does not indicate that probation  
               or parole has ever been revoked without thereafter being  
               completed.
                 The defendant's record does not indicate that he or she  
               has successfully completed or been terminated from  
               diversion or DEJ within five years prior to the alleged  
               commission of the charged offense. 
                 The defendant has no prior felony conviction within five  
               years prior to the alleged commission of the charged  
               offense. (Penal Code (PC) § 1000 (a).) 

          Existing law requires the court to hold a hearing and determine  
          if the defendant consents to further proceedings and if the  
          defendant should be granted DEJ. If the court does not find that  
          the defendant would benefit by DEJ, or if the defendant does not  
          consent to participate, the proceedings are required to continue  
          as in any other case. Under existing law, DEJ is granted for no  
          less than 18 months, but no longer than three years. (PC §  
          1000.2.)

          With regard to issues related to immigration, a conviction for  
          possession of controlled substances, even if dismissed, could  
          potentially prompt deportation proceedings or prevent an  
          individual from becoming a U.S. citizen. This bill seeks to  
          reduce the potential for such adverse immigration consequences.




          Proposed Law:  
           This bill provides that in any case in which a defendant was  








          AB 1352 (Eggman)                                       Page 2 of  
          ?
          
          
          granted DEJ, on or after January 1, 1997, after pleading guilty  
          or nolo contendere to the charged offense, a defendant shall be  
          permitted by the court to withdraw the plea of guilty or nolo  
          contendere and enter a plea of not guilty if the defendant  
          attests to both of the following:
                 The charges were dismissed after the defendant performed  
               satisfactorily during the DEJ period.
                 The plea may result in the denial or loss to the  
               defendant of any employment, benefit, license, or  
               certificate, including, but not limited to, causing a  
               noncitizen defendant to potentially be found inadmissible,  
               deportable, or subject to any other kind of adverse  
               immigration consequence. 

          This bill directs the Judicial Council to develop a form for use  
          by persons seeking the relief authorized by this bill to attest  
          to the information required for such relief. Additionally, this  
          bill:


                 Requires a defendant seeking relief under this bill to  
               submit documentation, as specified, of dismissal of charges  
               pursuant to successful completion of DEJ, in addition to  
               attesting to information required for relief. 
                 Requires the court to dismiss the complaint or  
               information against the defendant if the defendant shows  
               that he or she performed satisfactorily under DEJ and that  
               the plea underlying DEJ may result in a denial of  
               employment benefit, license or certificate, or have adverse  
               immigration consequences. 
                 Provides legislative findings and declarations that  
               state, "The statement in PC § 1000.4, that "successful  
               completion of a DEJ program shall not, without the  
               defendant's consent, be used in any way that could result  
               in the denial of any employment, benefit, license, or  
               certificate," constitutes misinformation about the actual  
               consequences of the plea underlying DEJ. Specifically, in  
               the case of some defendants, including all noncitizen  
               defendants, the disposition of the case may cause adverse  
               consequences, including adverse immigration consequences.  
               Accordingly, the Legislature finds and declares that based  
               on this misinformation and the potential harm of the plea,  
               the defendant's prior plea is invalid." 









          AB 1352 (Eggman)                                       Page 3 of  
          ?
          
          

          Related  
          Legislation:  AB 1351 (Eggman) 2015 would convert the existing  
          system of DEJ to pretrial diversion. This bill is scheduled to  
          be heard today by this Committee.


          Staff  
          Comments:  The Judicial Council could potentially incur  
          significant new workload for requests for dismissal of pleas for  
          defendants granted DEJ on or after January 1, 1997, after  
          pleading guilty or nolo contendere to a charged offense, as  
          specified. In the absence of available data indicating how many  
          individuals will request relief offered by the bill, however,  
          the extent of the fiscal impact is unknown but potentially  
          significant and in excess of hundreds of thousands of dollars  
          annually.


                                      -- END --