BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 1352


                                                                    Page  1


          (Without Reference to File)





          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS


          AB  
          1352 (Eggman)


          As Amended  September 9, 2015


          Majority vote


           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |      |(May 4, 2015)  |SENATE: |      |(September 11,   |
          |           |42-33 |               |        |      |2015)            |
          |           |      |               |        |      |                 |
          |           |      |               |        |      |                 |
           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
                                               (vote not available)




          Original Committee Reference:  PUB. S.




          SUMMARY:  Requires the court to permit a defendant, who was  
          granted deferred entry of judgment (DEJ) on or after January 1,  
          1997, and who has performed satisfactorily during the period in  
          which DEJ was granted and for whom the criminal charge or  
          charges were dismissed, to withdraw his or her plea and enter a  
          plea of not guilty. 
          The Senate amendments:








                                                                    AB 1352


                                                                    Page  2




          1)Provide if court records showing the case resolution are no  
            longer available, the defendant's declaration, under penalty  
            of perjury, that the charges were dismissed after he or she  
            completed the requirements for DEJ, shall be presumed to be  
            true if the defendant has submitted a copy of his or her state  
            summary criminal history information maintained by the  
            Department of Justice that either shows that the defendant  
            successfully completed the deferred entry of judgment program  
            or that the record is incomplete in that it does not show a  
            final disposition.


          2)State that for purposes of this bill, a final disposition  
            means that the state summary criminal history information  
            shows either a dismissal after completion of the program or a  
            sentence after termination of the program.


          3)Delete the provision that required the defendant to submit  
            documentation of the dismissal of charges or satisfactory  
            participation in, or completion of diversion programming.


          4)Delete the provision that required Judicial Council to develop  
            the necessary form to be completed and submitted by the  
            defendant.


          5)Make technical, nonsubstantive changes.


          EXISTING LAW:  


          1)Provides that a defendant may qualify for DEJ of specified  
            non-violent drug possession offenses if the following apply to  
            the defendant:


             a)   The defendant has no prior conviction for any offense  








                                                                    AB 1352


                                                                    Page  3


               involving controlled substances;
             b)   The offense charged did not involve a crime of violence  
               or threatened violence;


             c)   There is no evidence of a violation relating to  
               narcotics or restricted dangerous drugs other than a  
               violation of the specified deferrable drug offenses;


             d)   The defendant's record does not indicate that probation  
               or parole has ever been revoked without thereafter being  
               completed;


             e)   The defendant's record does not indicate that he or she  
               has successfully completed or been terminated from  
               diversion or deferred entry of judgment pursuant to this  
               chapter within five years prior to the alleged commission  
               of the charged offense;


             f)   The defendant has no prior felony conviction within five  
               years prior to the alleged commission of the charged  
               offense.    


          1)States that upon successful completion of a DEJ program, the  
            arrest upon which the judgment was deferred shall be deemed to  
            have never occurred.  The defendant may indicate in response  
            to any question concerning his or her prior criminal record  
            that he or she was not arrested or granted deferred entry of  
            judgment for the offense, except as specified for employment  
            as a peace officer.  A record pertaining to an arrest  
            resulting in successful completion of a DEJ program shall not,  
            without the defendant's consent, be used in any way that could  
            result in the denial of any employment, benefit, license, or  
            certificate.  
          2)States that in any case in which:  a) a defendant has  
            fulfilled the conditions of probation for the entire period of  
            probation, or b) has been discharged prior to the termination  
            of the period of probation, or c) in any other case in which a  








                                                                    AB 1352


                                                                    Page  4


            court, in its discretion and the interests of justice,  
            determines that a defendant should be granted the relief  
            available under this section, the defendant shall, at any time  
            after the termination of the period of probation, if he or she  
            is not then serving a sentence for any offense, on probation  
            for any offense, or charged with the commission of any  
            offense, be permitted by the court to withdraw his or her plea  
            of guilty or plea of nolo contendere and enter a plea of not  
            guilty; or, if he or she has been convicted after a plea of  
            not guilty, the court shall set aside the verdict of guilty;  
            and, in either case, the court shall thereupon dismiss the  
            accusations or information against the defendant.


          3)Provides circumstances that allow non-citizens to be deported,  
            which include having been convicted of a violation of (or a  
            conspiracy or attempt to violate) any law or regulation of a  
            state, the United States, or a foreign country relating to a  
            controlled substance as defined, other than a single offense  
            involving possession for one's own use of 30 grams or less of  
            marijuana.


          AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY, this bill required the court to allow  
          a defendant to withdraw his or her guilty or nolo contendere  
          plea in order to avoid specified adverse consequences if certain  
          conditions are met:


          1)Provided in any case in which a defendant was granted DEJ, on  
            or after January 1, 1997, after pleading guilty or nolo  
            contendere to the charged offense, the defendant shall be  
            permitted by the court to withdraw the plea of guilty or nolo  
            contendere and enter a plea of not guilty if the defendant  
            shows both of the following:


             a)   The charges were dismissed after the defendant performed  
               satisfactorily during the DEJ period; and,
             b)   The plea may result in the denial or loss to the  
               defendant of any employment, benefit, license, or  
               certificate, including, but not limited to, causing a  








                                                                    AB 1352


                                                                    Page  5


               noncitizen defendant to potentially be found inadmissable,  
               deportable, or subject to any other kind of adverse  
               immigration consequence.


          2)Required the court to dismiss the complaint or information  
            against the defendant.
          3)Stated the Legislative finding that the statement in Penal  
            Code Section 1000.4, that "successful completion of a DEJ  
            program shall not, without the defendant's consent, be used in  
            any way that could result in the denial of any employment,  
            benefit, license, or certificate" constitutes misinformation  
            about the actual consequences of making a plea in the case of  
            some defendants, including all noncitizen defendants, because  
            the disposition of the case may cause adverse consequences,  
            including adverse immigration consequences.


          4)Declared based upon this misinformation and the potential  
            harm, the defendant's prior plea is invalid. 


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee, potentially significant increase in trial court costs  
          (General Fund*) for new petitions to dismiss pleas of guilty and  
          nolo contendere submitted for cases granted DEJ retroactive to  
          January 1, 1997.


          *Trial Court Trust Fund


          COMMENTS:  According to the author, "AB 1352 provides a minor  
          expungement procedure to prevent the needless disruption of  
          thousands of California families.  The expungement proposed by  
          this bill does not retroactively change the effect of the  
          person's DEJ disposition under California law.  Instead, it will  
          eliminate the disposition as a conviction for federal  
          immigration purposes.  It also will make right the injustice  
          inadvertently committed against the immigrant defendants who  
          relied upon PC [Section] 1000.4 in deciding to enter a guilty  
          plea.








                                                                    AB 1352


                                                                    Page  6




          "This bill will prevent terrible harm to California families and  
          immigrant communities.  The last several years have seen mass  
          deportations from the U.S. [United States].  Of deportations  
          based on criminal conviction, the largest number has been for  
          minor, non-trafficking drug offenses.  This especially affects  
          California, the nation's most immigrant-rich state, where one  
          out of two children lives in a household headed by at least one  
          foreign born person (and the great majority of the children are  
          U.S. citizens).  Deportation of a parent devastates a family  
          emotionally and economically and can drain state resources as  
          U.S. citizen children go into foster care, homes go into  
          foreclosure, and remaining citizen family seek public benefits."


          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Stella Choe / PUB. S. / (916) 319-3744  FN:  
          0002428