BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó






           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       AB 1378|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                   THIRD READING 


          Bill No:  AB 1378
          Author:   Holden (D)
          Introduced:2/27/15  
          Vote:     21  

           SENATE GOVERNANCE & FIN. COMMITTEE:  7-0, 7/8/15
           AYES:  Hertzberg, Nguyen, Beall, Hernandez, Lara, Moorlach,  
            Pavley

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE:  7-0, 8/27/15
           AYES:  Lara, Bates, Beall, Hill, Leyva, Mendoza, Nielsen

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  80-0, 6/1/15 - See last page for vote

           SUBJECT:   Property tax: base year value transfersProperty tax:  
                     base year value transfers.


          SOURCE:    Author


          DIGEST:  This bill provides that a claimants spouse shall not be  
          deemed as a claimant for purposes of base year value transfers.


          ANALYSIS:   


          Existing law:


          1)Provides that all property is taxable unless explicitly  
            exempted by the Constitution or federal law.








                                                                    AB 1378  
                                                                    Page  2




          2)Limits the maximum amount of any ad valorem tax on real  
            property at 1% of full cash value, and directs assessors to  
            only reappraise property when newly constructed, or ownership  
            changes.


          3)Allows homeowners over the age of 55 and disabled persons  
            (regardless of age) to transfer their home's base year values  
            to a replacement home of equal or lesser value within the same  
            county (Proposition 60, 1988, and Proposition 110, 1990), or  
            to homes in counties that adopt ordinances allowing the  
            transfer (Proposition 90, 1990).  


          4)Defines "claimant" as any eligible person claiming the base  
            year transfer.


          5)Limits claimants to one base-year value transfer.


          This bill:


          1)Provides that a claimant's spouse shall not be deemed as a  
            claimant for purposes of base year value transfers by deleting  
            references to the spouse from the relevant section of the  
            Revenue and Taxation Code, thereby allowing a spouse to  
            subsequently claim another base year value transfer.


          2)Applies the change solely to claims filed on or after January  
            1, 2016, by individuals who have not previously been granted a  
            transfer.


          Background


          Because the Constitution doesn't specify eligibility  
          requirements, state law details them for base year value  
          transfers.  Instead of allowing infinite transfers, state law  







                                                                    AB 1378  
                                                                    Page  3


          limits taxpayers to one transfer, as a "claimant" is eligible  
          only when an assessor has not previously granted a base year  
          transfer.  Currently, the law only allows individuals to claim a  
          second base year value transfer after becoming 55 years of age,  
          then another should they subsequently become disabled, or vice  
          versa.  If the claimant has a spouse who is also an owner of  
          record of the home, then the spouse is considered a claimant,  
          and therefore precluded from claiming a base year transfer in  
          the future.  


          Comments


          Currently, whenever a taxpayer transfers a base year value to a  
          replacement property, his or her spouse is permanently precluded  
          for subsequently claiming a base year value transfer if their  
          name is on the title, as they are considered a "claimant."  AB  
          1378 deletes spouses from that term's definition.  However,  
          under current law, taxpayers can also avoid this "marriage  
          penalty" by simply keeping the spouse's name off of the title of  
          either the original home, or failing that, keep the original  
          claimant's name off the replacement home when they buy it.   
          Additionally, currently law allows the spouses of individuals  
          who own property separately, and are not themselves over 55 or  
          disabled, but reside on a property with a person who is but not  
          on title, to claim the base year value transfer on their behalf.  
           By deleting cohabitating spouses from the definition of  
          "claimant," AB 1378 allows for second transfers, but at the cost  
          of always requiring the eligible person to claim the transfer,  
          and be a recorded owner of both properties.     


          The Board of Equalization (BOE) collects data from counties to  
          ensure that one taxpayer is not filing multiple claims for  
          benefits when the taxpayer is not eligible.  In this case, state  
          law requires BOE to maintain a database of base year value  
          transfer claimants, so the name of both the claimant and the  
          spouse is entered into the database.  If a claimant's spouse  
          subsequently applies, the BOE database would match the name, and  
          the transfer could not be granted.  AB 1378's change ensures  
          that the spouse's name didn't go in the database, so that he or  
          she can maintain eligibility for a future transfer.  However,  
          because this bill is prospective, names currently in the  







                                                                    AB 1378  
                                                                    Page  4


          database would remain ineligible.


          FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:    No          Fiscal  
          Com.:YesLocal:   No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, AB 1378  
          results in a $350,000 annual property tax revenue loss,  
          increasing annually thereafter.


          SUPPORT:   (Verified8/28/15)


          California Assessors Association
          California Association of Realtors
          California Taxpayers Association
          Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified8/28/15)


          None received


          ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT:  According to the author, "Assembly Bill  
          1378 recognizes the evolving nature of marriage relations and  
          living patterns of Californians and expands eligibility for a  
          Proposition 60/90 transfer to include one transfer per person in  
          a recognized long-term relationship.  Assembly Bill 1378 ensures  
          California law recognizes all types of marriages, cohabitations  
          and housing situations."  

          ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  80-0, 6/1/15
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom,  
            Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang,  
            Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle,  
            Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina  
            Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez,  
            Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden,  
            Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder,  
            Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina,  
            Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen,  







                                                                    AB 1378  
                                                                    Page  5


            Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez,  
            Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting,  
            Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins

          Prepared by:Colin Grinnell / GOV. & F. / (916) 651-4119
          8/31/15 9:05:48


                                   ****  END  ****