BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 1385 Page 1 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 1385 (Ting) As Amended May 5, 2015 Majority vote -------------------------------------------------------------------- |Committee |Votes |Ayes |Noes | |----------------+------+--------------------+-----------------------| |Higher |9-3 |Medina, Bloom, |Baker, Chávez, Harper | |Education | |Irwin, Levine, | | | | |Linder, Low, | | | | |Santiago, Weber, | | | | |Williams | | -------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Prohibits the accrediting agency for California Community Colleges (CCCs) from imposing a special assessment on CCCs for legal fees for any lawsuit, unless there has been an affirmative vote of the majority of the chief executive officers, or their designees, of all of the CCCs. Specifically, this bill: 1)Prohibits the CCC accrediting agency from imposing a special assessment on CCCs for the accrediting agency's legal fees for any lawsuit, unless there has been an affirmative vote of the majority of the chief executive officers, or their designees, of all of the CCCs. AB 1385 Page 2 2)Provides that each CCC, as represented by its chief executive officer, or his or her designee, shall be eligible to cast a vote on the assessment. 3)Provides that this provision does not apply to the accrediting agency's activities that are related to private educational institutions in the state or educational institutions outside of the state. 4)Provides that this section does not affect the authority of the United States Department of Education regarding educational institutions. 5)Sets aside the provisions of this bill if it is determined by the CCC Chancellor that federal criteria for recognition of an accrediting agency prohibits a recognized accrediting agency from complying with the requirements. EXISTING LAW: 1)Establishes the CCC Board of Governors (BOG) to provide general supervision over the CCC and requires the BOG to prescribe minimum standards for CCC formation and operation (Education Code Section 66700). 2)Requires the BOG to develop minimum standards governing academic standards, employment policies and shared governance; evaluate CCC fiscal and educational effectiveness and provide assistance when districts encounter management difficulties; administer state funding and establish minimum conditions entitling CCC districts to receive state funds; requires the CCC BOG, in determining if a CCC district satisfies the minimum conditions for receipt of apportionment funding, to review the accreditation status of the CCCs within that district review and approve educational programs (Education Code Section 70901). AB 1385 Page 3 3)Requires the accrediting agency for CCCs to report to the appropriate policy and budget subcommittees of the Legislature upon the issuance of a decision that affects the accreditation status of a community college and, on a biannual basis, any accreditation policy changes that affect the accreditation process or status for a CCC; and, requires the CCC Chancellor's Office to ensure that the appropriate policy and budget subcommittees are provided the aforementioned required information (Education Code Sections 72208). 4)BOG regulations (5 California Code of Regulation Section 51016) require CCCs to be accredited by the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges (ACCJC). However, BOG recently approved regulatory changes to remove the explicit requirement of accreditation by the ACCJC. The regulatory change would provide that accreditation shall be determined only by an accrediting agency approved recommended by the CCC Chancellor and approved by the BOG. The BOG is authorized to approve only an accreditor recognized and approved by the United States Secretary of the Department of Education (USDE) under the Higher Education Act of 1965 acting within the agency's scope of recognition by the Secretary. FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown. This bill is keyed non-fiscal by the Legislative Counsel. COMMENTS: Purpose of this bill. According to the author, CCCs are being "forced to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to fund the ACCJC's legal bills" following its decision to terminate the accreditation of City College of San Francisco (CCSF). The author notes that CCCs were assessed a 5% special assessment for 2014-15; ACCJC is expected to issue a similar assessment in 2015-16 for CCSF-associated legal fees. The author also argues, Judge Karnow "ultimately ruled that the ACCJC had violated the due process AB 1385 Page 4 rights of CCSF when they departed from the ACCJC's evaluation team findings and identified 10 additional deficiencies without providing details to the college or affording them to opportunity to respond before the ACCJC made the decision to revoke their accreditation." The author notes that, even though ACCJC was found to have violated the law, CCCs, and ultimately the state, are forced to fund the legal defense or face the threat of loss of accreditation. The author believes that if ACCJC continues to take such actions, the state will be forced to continue to fund ACCJC legal defenses. This bill is designed to ensure CCCs, and ultimately California taxpayers, are not forced to fund ACCJC legal costs without the approval of the majority of CCC chief executive officers. Federal criteria for recognition. The USDE provides recognition of accrediting agencies. In order for an institution to participate in federal financial aid programs an institution must be accredited by a recognized accrediting agency. Accrediting agencies are required pursuant to federal regulations to meet several outlined criteria for recognition, including requiring the accrediting agency to be separate and independent, meaning, among other requirements, that the agency develops and determines its own budget with no review or consultation with any other entity or organization (34 Code of Federal Regulation Section 602.14(b)(5)). An alternative approval by the USDE Secretary is available, but that alternative also requires the agency to have budgetary and administrative autonomy (34 Code of Federal Regulation Section 602.14(d)(3)). Analysis Prepared by: Laura Metune / HIGHER ED. / (916) 319-3960 FN: 0000271 AB 1385 Page 5