BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 1412


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  May 20, 2015


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                                 Jimmy Gomez, Chair


          AB  
          1412 (Perea) - As Amended April 30, 2015


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Local Government               |Vote:|9 - 0        |
          |Committee:   |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |Housing and Community          |     |6 - 0        |
          |             |Development                    |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  NoReimbursable:  No


          SUMMARY:  This bill allows for an expedited repayment schedule  
          of an outstanding loan agreement entered into between a former  
          redevelopment agency (RDA) and the City of San Joaquin, in  
          specified conditions.  Specifically, this bill:  










                                                                    AB 1412


                                                                    Page  2





          1)Requires, upon application by the successor agency and  
            approval by the oversight board, loan agreements entered into  
            between the RDA and the City of San Joaquin, where the  
            outstanding principal balance of the loan is $1.25 million or  
            less, to be deemed to be enforceable obligations, if the  
            oversight board makes all of the following findings:


             a)   The loan was for legitimate redevelopment purposes, and  
               was entered into more than two years after the creation of  
               the former RDA, and prior to January 1, 2011.


             b)   The loan was related to an indebtedness obligation and  
               is the only debt of the former RDA remaining to be paid on  
               the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS). 


             c)   The amount distributed to the taxing entities pursuant  
               to existing law in the previous fiscal year was less than  
               $250,000.


          2)Prohibits repayments of a loan described above, from being  
            subject to existing law that specifies the calculation  
            schedule and maximum repayment amounts of a loan, but  
            continues to require that 20% of a loan repayment be  
            transferred to the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund.


          3)Provides that the accumulated interest rate shall be  
            recalculated from origination at the interested rate of .25  
            percent.


          FISCAL EFFECT:


          Annual State costs of approximately $50,000 (GF) for up to ten  








                                                                    AB 1412


                                                                    Page  3





          years to backfill schools. Accelerating the loan repayment will  
          result in a temporary reduction in property tax revenues  
          distributed to other local taxing entities, including schools.  
          Under Proposition 98, the General Fund would be required to  
          backfill the resulting property tax losses to schools.


          COMMENTS:


          1)Purpose. According to the author, "The City of San Joaquin and  
            Successor Agency to the former San Joaquin Redevelopment  
            Agency requested this bill because the City is owed over $1  
            million from a loan made to the former San Joaquin  
            Redevelopment Agency.  Under existing law, the loan cannot be  
            repaid until 2050.  The City is in dire need of repayment  
            because the remaining amount due is larger than the City's  
            annual budget.  The loan repayment would fund much needed  
            public services for the community, which has significantly  
            lower median wages, higher poverty rates, and higher  
            unemployment rates compared to the rest of the State and  
            nation. Because DOF cannot authorize the Successor Agency to  
            make payments on the outstanding loan in excess of the maximum  
            amounts set in existing law, special legislation is required."  



          2)Background. The City of San Joaquin and the Redevelopment  
            Agency entered into a loan agreement, dated February 11, 2010,  
            whereby the City and the RDA recognized that the RDA had  
            borrowed funds from the City for RDA programs and operations.   
            The outstanding principal amount owed to the City under the  
            loan agreement, as of February 1, 2012, (the date of  
            dissolution of the former RDA), was $1,028,723.  This loan  
            agreement formalized loans made by the City to the RDA since  
            1998 to fund redevelopment programs and operations.  In part,  
            the loan helped the RDA pay off debts after bonds issued in  
            1997 went into default.









                                                                    AB 1412


                                                                    Page  4






            The Successor Agency was issued a finding of completion by DOF  
            on March 8, 2013.   On April 24, 2013, the Successor Agency  
            applied for and the Oversight Board approved the loan  
            agreement, and made a finding that the loan of funds to the  
            RDA under the loan agreement was for legitimate purposes.  The  
            loan agreement was subsequently amended on February 11, 2014,  
            and the new loan agreement was approved by DOF on January 28,  
            2015.  The approved terms of the loan agreement allow for the  
            payment of $1,028,723 bearing an interest rate of 0.249% as  
            determined by the current Local Agency Investment Fund rate.  


            Under existing law, the loan is estimated by the City to not  
            be fully repaid until the year 2050.  Under this bill, the  
            City estimates that the loan will be repaid by fiscal year  
            2021-22.  


            The City notes that the Successor Agency sent a letter to and  
            met with DOF requesting that they consider allowing the  
            Successor Agency to make payments on the outstanding loan in  
            excess of the maximum annual amounts set by the formula in  
            existing law.  However, DOF denied the Successor Agency's  
            request, stating that they do not have the authority to allow  
            for any other repayment amount outside of what is defined in  
            the statute.


          


          Analysis Prepared by:Jennifer Swenson / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081













                                                                    AB 1412


                                                                    Page  5