BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



          SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNANCE AND FINANCE
                         Senator Robert M. Hertzberg, Chair
                                2015 - 2016  Regular 

                              
          
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Bill No:  |AB 1412                          |Hearing    | 6/17/15 |
          |          |                                 |Date:      |         |
          |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------|
          |Author:   |Perea                            |Tax Levy:  |No       |
          |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------|
          |Version:  |4/30/15                          |Fiscal:    |Yes      |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Consultant|Weinberger                                            |
          |:         |                                                      |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

                  CITY OF SAN JOAQUIN'S REDEVELOPMENT LOAN REPAYMENT



          Allows the successor agency to the City of San Joaquin's former  
          redevelopment agency to accelerate the repayment of loan debts  
          owed by the former agency to the city


           Background and Existing Law

           Until 2011, the Community Redevelopment Law allowed local  
          officials to set up redevelopment agencies (RDAs), prepare and  
          adopt redevelopment plans, and finance redevelopment activities.  
           Citing a significant State General Fund deficit, Governor  
          Brown's 2011-12 budget proposed eliminating RDAs and returning  
          billions of dollars of property tax revenues to schools, cities,  
          and counties to fund core services.  Among the statutory changes  
          that the Legislature adopted to implement the 2011-12 budget, AB  
          X1 26 (Blumenfield, 2011) dissolved all RDAs.  The California  
          Supreme Court's 2011 ruling in California Redevelopment  
          Association v. Matosantos upheld AB X1 26, but invalidated AB X1  
          27 (Blumenfield, 2011), which would have allowed most RDAs to  
          avoid dissolution.

          AB X1 26 established successor agencies to manage the process of  
          unwinding former RDAs' affairs.  With limited exceptions, the  
          city or county that created each former RDA now serves as that  
          RDA's successor agency.  Each successor agency has an oversight  
          board that is responsible for supervising it and approving its  







          AB 1412 (Perea) 4/30/15                                 Page 2  
          of ?
          
          
          actions.  One of the successor agencies' primary  
          responsibilities is to make payments for enforceable  
          obligations, which are statutorily-defined legally binding and  
          enforceable commitments entered into by former RDAs.  

          State law generally excludes from the definition of "enforceable  
          obligation" any agreements, including loan agreements, between  
          the city, county, or city and county that created a former  
          redevelopment agency and the former redevelopment agency.   
          However, if a successor agency complies with state laws  
          requiring it to remit specified RDA property tax allocations and  
          cash  assets identified through a "due diligence review"  
          process, it receives a "finding of completion" from the  
          Department of Finance (AB 1484, Assembly Budget Committee,  
          2012).  A successor agency that receives a finding of completion  
          can repay loans made to a former redevelopment agency by the  
          city or county that created it, if the successor agency's  
          oversight board finds that the loan was for legitimate  
          redevelopment purposes.  State law specifies timelines, maximum  
          repayment amounts, and interest rate calculations that apply to  
          these loan repayments  

          The City of San Joaquin and its redevelopment agency entered  
          into a loan agreement, dated February 11, 2010, whereby the City  
          and the RDA recognized that the RDA had borrowed funds from the  
          City for RDA programs and operations.  The outstanding principal  
          amount owed to the City under the loan agreement, as of February  
          1, 2012, (the date of dissolution of the former RDA), was  
          $1,028,723.  This loan agreement formalized loans made by the  
          City to the RDA since 1998 to fund redevelopment programs and  
          operations.  In part, the loan helped the RDA pay off debts  
          after bonds issued in 1997 went into default.

          DOF issued a finding of completion for the successor agency on  
          March 8, 2013.  On April 24, 2013, the successor agency's  
          oversight board approved the loan agreement, and made a finding  
          that the loan of funds to the RDA under the loan agreement was  
          for legitimate redevelopment purposes.  The loan agreement was  
          subsequently amended on February 11, 2014, and the new loan  
          agreement was approved by DOF on January 28, 2015.  The approved  
          terms of the loan agreement allow for the payment of $1,028,723  
          bearing an interest rate of 0.249% as determined by the current  
          Local Agency Investment Fund rate.  









          AB 1412 (Perea) 4/30/15                                 Page 3  
          of ?
          
          
          San Joaquin city officials estimate that, under current law, the  
          loan will not be fully repaid until 2050.  Faced with ongoing  
          economic and fiscal challenges, city officials want the  
          Legislature to allow the successor agency to repay the loan more  
          rapidly.


           Proposed Law

           Assembly Bill 1412 allows for an expedited repayment schedule of  
          a loan agreement between a former redevelopment agency (RDA) and  
          the City of San Joaquin, subject to specified conditions.   
          Specifically, the bill:  
                 Requires, upon application by the successor agency and  
               approval by the oversight board, loan agreements entered  
               into between the RDA and the City of San Joaquin, where the  
               outstanding principal balance of the loan is $1.25 million  
               or less, to be deemed to be enforceable obligations, if the  
               oversight board makes all of the following findings:

                  o         The loan was for legitimate redevelopment  
                    purposes, and was entered into more than two years  
                    after the creation of the former RDA, and before  
                    January 1, 2011.

                  o         The loan was related to an indebtedness  
                    obligation and is the only debt of the former RDA  
                    remaining to be paid on the Recognized Obligation  
                    Payment Schedule (ROPS). 

                  o         The amount of former tax increment revenues  
                    distributed to the taxing entities pursuant to  
                    existing law in the previous fiscal year was less than  
                    $250,000.

                 Prohibits repayments of a loan described above, from  
               being subject to existing law that specifies the  
               calculation schedule and maximum repayment amounts of a  
               loan.

                 Directs that the accumulated interest rate must be  
               recalculated from origination at the interested rate of .25  
               percent.









          AB 1412 (Perea) 4/30/15                                 Page 4  
          of ?
          
          

           State Revenue Impact

           No estimate.


           Comments

           1.  Purpose of the bill  .  The City of San Joaquin confronts  
          significant economic and fiscal challenges.  By allowing San  
          Joaquin's successor agency to make loan payments that exceed the  
          maximum amounts allowed by existing law AB 1412 will increase  
          revenues that are available to support vital public services in  
          the city, which has significantly lower median wages, higher  
          poverty rates, and higher unemployment rates compared to the  
          rest of California and the United States.  Because the City's  
          loan is the only remaining enforceable obligation of the former  
          RDA's successor agency, accelerating the loan repayment will  
          allow the wind-down of the former RDA's affairs to be completed  
          much sooner than it would be under existing law. 

          2.  Zero-sum game  .  Allocating former RDAs' property tax  
          increment revenues is a zero-sum game; every reallocation  
          creates winners and losers.  Under AB 1412's provisions, the San  
          Joaquin RDA's successor agency will receive a larger allocation  
          of former property tax increment revenues over the next several  
          years than it would under current law.  Other local governments  
          - including school districts - will receive smaller allocations  
          than they would under current law.  One fiscal loser will be the  
          State General Fund, which must backfill the revenues that the  
          schools won't get.  

          3.   Next in line  ?  Changing state law to address the City of San  
          Joaquin's need for accelerated RDA loan repayment may invite  
          similar proposals from other local governments.  There are  
          undoubtedly other cities that would like to benefit from a more  
          rapid repayment of their former RDAs' debts.  While AB 1412's  
          provisions require the successor agency's oversight board to  
          make finding that underscore relatively unique characteristics  
          of the San Joaquin loan, like the fact that it is the successor  
          agency's only remaining enforceable obligation, the bill may lay  
          the groundwork for future requests to change loan repayment  
          provisions to suit other communities' unique circumstances.









          AB 1412 (Perea) 4/30/15                                 Page 5  
          of ?
          
          
          4.   Special legislation  .  The California Constitution prohibits  
          special legislation when a general law can apply (Article IV,  
          §16).  AB 1412 contains findings and declarations explaining the  
          need for legislation that applies only to the City of San  
          Joaquin.


           Assembly Actions

           Assembly Local Government Committee:           9-0
          Assembly Housing & Community Development Committee:  6-0
          Assembly Appropriation Committee:            15-0
          Assembly Floor:                              76-0


          Support and  
          Opposition   (6/11/15)


           Support  :  City of San Joaquin.

           Opposition  :  Unknown.


                                      -- END --