BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                      AB 1440


                                                                      Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          1440 (Nazarian)


          As Amended  April 20, 2015


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Committee       |Votes |Ayes                 |Noes                 |
          |----------------+------+---------------------+---------------------|
          |Insurance       |12-0  |Daly, Beth Gaines,   |                     |
          |                |      |Calderon, Cooley,    |                     |
          |                |      |Cooper, Dababneh,    |                     |
          |                |      |Frazier, Gatto,      |                     |
          |                |      |Gonzalez, Grove,     |                     |
          |                |      |Mayes, Rodriguez     |                     |
          |                |      |                     |                     |
          |----------------+------+---------------------+---------------------|
          |Appropriations  |17-0  |Gomez, Bigelow,      |                     |
          |                |      |Bonta, Calderon,     |                     |
          |                |      |Chang, Daly, Eggman, |                     |
          |                |      |Gallagher,           |                     |
          |                |      |                     |                     |
          |                |      |                     |                     |
          |                |      |Eduardo Garcia,      |                     |
          |                |      |Gordon, Holden,      |                     |
          |                |      |Jones, Quirk,        |                     |
          |                |      |Rendon, Wagner,      |                     |
          |                |      |Weber, Wood          |                     |
          |                |      |                     |                     |
          |                |      |                     |                     |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 









                                                                      AB 1440


                                                                      Page  2






          SUMMARY:  Establishes the statutory structure for seismic retrofit  
          grant program for individual homeowners.  Specifically, this bill:  
           


          1)Requires the California Earthquake Authority (CEA) to form a  
            joint powers authority (JPA) with the Office of Emergency  
            Services (OES) to develop a seismic retrofit grant program for  
            individual homeowners.


          2)Limits grant funding from this program to individual homeowners  
            and grant amounts to 75% of retrofit costs or $3,000.


          3)Requires the JPA to adopt regulations defining the type and  
            location of homes eligible for grant funding.


          4)Requires the JPA to adopt regulations to establish the criteria  
            for determining grant amounts.


          5)Makes findings and declarations regarding earthquake mitigation  
            efforts and the need for residential seismic retrofit programs.


          EXISTING LAW:  


          1)Establishes the CEA as a publicly managed insurer to provide  
            residential earthquake insurance.
          2)Defines residential earthquake insurance as a policy protecting  
            a residence with four or fewer dwelling units.


          3)Requires OES to perform a variety of duties with respect to  
            specified emergency preparedness, mitigation, and response  








                                                                      AB 1440


                                                                      Page  3





            activities in the state, including emergency medical services.


          4)Establishes the Earthquake Loss Mitigation Fund (mitigation  
            fund) as a sub-account with the CEA Fund and directs the fund to  
            transfer 5% of its investment earnings into the fund each year.   
            This fund is available to pay for research and mitigation  
            programs undertaken by the CEA.


          5)Allows public agencies to form JPAs for the exercise of shared  
            powers.


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee:


          1)The creation of the program in statute, by itself, does not have  
            state costs, as the program would only be operational if the  
            Legislature appropriates funds. The California Earthquake  
            Authority (CEA) is privately funded and the current grant  
            program is funded by a portion of CEA investment income.


          2)However, creation of the program in statute, coupled with  
            legislative findings, imply the availability of state funding  
            for the program.

          COMMENTS:  

          1)Purpose.  According to the author, only 12% California  
            homeowners have earthquake insurance, but there are between 1.2  
            million to 1.6 million pre-1940s homes with so called "cripple  
            walls," and homes on hillsides, and those with living space over  
            garages that are at serious risk in even a minor quake, let  
            alone a major one.  California has an existing seismic  
            mitigation incentive program called Earthquake Brace + Bolt  
            (EBB), which is administered by the California Residential  








                                                                      AB 1440


                                                                      Page  4





            Mitigation Program, but is limited to only 650 homes in the Bay  
            Area, LA County and Napa.  The goal of this legislation is to  
            expand on Brace + Bolt and create a statewide earthquake  
            retrofit program to cover tens of thousands of more homes.

          2)Brace + Bolt.  The EBB program was created by the California  
            Residential Mitigation Program, which is a joint power authority  
            between the California Earthquake Authority and the Governor's  
            Office of Emergency Services.  The EBB was developed to help  
            homeowners lessen the potential for damage to their houses  
            during an earthquake.  A residential seismic retrofit  
            strengthens an existing house, making it more resistant to  
            earthquake activity such as ground shaking and soil failure, by  
            bolting the house to its foundation and adding bracing around  
            the perimeter of the crawl space.  The EBB program provides  
            homeowners up to $3,000 to strengthen their foundation and  
            lessen the potential for earthquake damage.  A typical retrofit  
            may cost between $2,000 and $10,000 depending upon the location,  
            the size of the house, and the amount of work involved. 

          3)California Earthquake Authority.  The CEA was formed through  
            legislation in 1995 and 1996 to address an  
            insurance-availability crisis that followed the 1994 Northridge  
            earthquake.  After that earthquake, many homeowners found it  
            difficult or impossible to find basic homeowner's insurance.   
            Many others were faced with the prospect of having their  
            homeowners' insurance non-renewed as insurance companies tried  
            to shed their exposure to earthquake risk.  Because state law  
            requires insurers to offer earthquake insurance to their  
            applicants and holders of residential policies, the insurers'  
            retreat from the California market resulted in an availability  
            crisis for both homeowners and earthquake insurance.  The  
            Department of Insurance reported in the summer of 1996, at the  
            height of the crisis, that 95% of the homeowners' insurance  
            market had either stopped, or severely restricted, sales of new  
            homeowners' policies.  After the CEA began operations in  
            December 1996, the California homeowners' insurance market  
            recovered quickly.  A Department of Insurance report noted that  
            at the peak of the availability crisis, 82 insurers had  








                                                                      AB 1440


                                                                      Page  5





            restricted the sale of new homeowners' insurance policies.  By  
            October 1997, only three insurers were restricting the sale of  
            new policies.  Since that time, the requirement to offer  
            earthquake insurance has not been a factor in restricting the  
            availability of homeowners' insurance.



          Analysis Prepared by:                                               
          Paul Riches / INS. / (916) 319-2086  FN: 0000954