BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 1451


                                                                    Page  1





          GOVERNOR'S VETO


          AB  
          1451 (Chávez)


          As Enrolled  July 15, 2015


          2/3 vote


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Committee       |Votes |Ayes                |Noes                |
          |                |      |                    |                    |
          |                |      |                    |                    |
          |----------------+------+--------------------+--------------------|
          |Insurance       |8-2   |Daly, Calderon,     |Beth Gaines, Travis |
          |                |      |Cooley, Cooper,     |Allen               |
          |                |      |Dababneh, Gatto,    |                    |
          |                |      |Gonzalez, Mayes     |                    |
          |                |      |                    |                    |
          |                |      |                    |                    |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          SUMMARY:  Authorizes enhanced temporary disability benefits  
          (known as "4850 time") for specified lifeguards employed by the  
          City of Oceanside.  Specifically, this bill:   
          1)Adds lifeguards employed by the City of Oceanside on a  
            full-time, year-round basis to the class of public safety  
            employees who receive special, enhanced temporary disability  
            benefits when they are unable to work due to illness or injury  
            that arose out of, or in the course of, employment.
          2)Includes legislative findings that a special law is necessary  
            within the meaning of California Constitution Article IV,  
            Section 16.









                                                                    AB 1451


                                                                    Page  2






          EXISTING LAW:


          1)Provides for a comprehensive system of benefits paid for by  
            employers to employees who suffer illness or injury that  
            arises out of, or in the course of, employment.
          2)Includes temporary disability (TD) benefits for up to 104  
            weeks if an employee is temporarily unable to work during  
            recuperation from the workplace illness or injury.


          3)Establishes a minimum and a maximum amount that an employee  
            may receive, which is adjusted annually to reflect rising wage  
            levels.  Currently the minimum benefit is $165 per week, and  
            the maximum benefit is $1,103.  The benefit is calculated  
            based on two-thirds of an employee's average weekly wages,  
            subject to the maximum cap.


          4)Provides specified public safety officers with an enhanced  
            temporary disability benefit for up to the first year of  
            temporary disability.  These safety officers receive their  
            full salary (tax free) during the first year of temporary  
            disability.


          5)Includes lifeguards who are full time year round employees of  
            the County of Los Angeles and the City of San Diego among the  
            safety officers who are entitled to this special enhanced  
            temporary disability benefit.


          6)Provides that a special statute is invalid if a general  
            statute could be made applicable.  


           FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, undetermined increased workers' compensation costs to  








                                                                    AB 1451


                                                                    Page  3





          the City of Oceanside.


          





          COMMENTS:   


          1)Purpose.  According to the author, the bill is intended to  
            correct an oversight that left out the City of Oceanside  
            lifeguards when the City of San Diego lifeguards were added to  
            the "4850" leave of absence law in 2013, when SB 527 (Block),  
            Chapter 66, Statutes of 2013, was enacted.  The author asserts  
            that the Oceanside lifeguards "have the same responsibilities,  
            training, and meet the mandates of the law to receive the  
            benefit."  The author asserts that both the employer and  
            employee association agree (as was the case with the expansion  
            for City of San Diego lifeguards) that this change is  
            appropriate.
          2)Collective bargaining?  If a local public agency wants to  
            grant employees certain benefits of employment, it is able to  
            accomplish that goal without need for a statutory change.  In  
            fact, the City of Los Angeles has provided "4850-like"  
            benefits to a range of employees without need of a statute  
            mandating the benefit for those employees.  If it is correct,  
            as the author asserts, that both the city and its employees  
            are in agreement, then the collective bargaining process, and  
            not legislation, may be the better approach to enhancing the  
            benefits of this class of employee.


          3)Temporary disability benefits.  The goal of TD is to  
            approximate an employee's take home pay during the period  
            after injury when the employee is temporarily unable to work.  
            This goal is implemented by basing the weekly TD benefit on  








                                                                    AB 1451


                                                                    Page  4





            2/3 of the employee's average weekly wages.  Because there is  
            a cap, employees who make more than approximately $1,600 per  
            week do not reach this 2/3 goal, but because the benefit is  
            tax free, most employees receive an adequate TD benefit while  
            they are recovering.


          4)Special public safety benefits.  Public safety officers  
            (police, sheriff, and firefighter employees generally) receive  
            certain special workers' compensation benefits that other  
            employees do not receive.  Most notably, this class of  
            employee has the benefit of a range of "presumptions" that  
            certain illnesses or injuries are automatically deemed to be  
            work related.  All other employees are required to prove that  
            their condition is work related.  The second significant  
            special workers' compensation benefit is granted by Labor Code  
            Section 4850 - commonly referred to as "4850 time" - and this  
            law grants defined employees up to one year of full salary in  
            lieu of the regular method for calculating TD benefits.  The  
            author asserts that these lifeguards are sufficiently like  
            other peace officers as to justify awarding them the special  
            disability leave benefits.


          5)Tax advantages.  Because these benefits are paid due to  
            disability, they are not subject to either state or federal  
            taxes.  This applies to regular TD benefits, and to 4850  
            benefits.  Because of the tax-free status of this benefit, a  
            public safety officer takes home substantially more in weekly  
            benefits than they normally earn while working - i.e., normal  
            take home pay plus what would have been paid in taxes.  Public  
            employers have long complained that this creates a  
            disincentive in getting injured public safety officers to  
            return to work, even if they are able, due to the financial  
            loss they would suffer when they return.  The extent of the  
            return to work disincentive may be unclear with respect to  
            these particular employees, but factually, they make more  
            money while off duty than when they return.









                                                                    AB 1451


                                                                    Page  5






          6)Lifeguards.  It appears that the year round, full-time  
            lifeguards employed by Los Angeles County were included in the  
            original legislation in 1983 that established Labor Code  
            Section 4850.  It is not clear why those employees were  
            included, nor whether they perform substantially public safety  
            and law enforcement duties, as is claimed by the City of San  
            Diego or the City of Oceanside lifeguards.  However, if the  
            expansion of public safety officer benefits to other classes  
            of employee is appropriate, the legislation should be clear  
            that the employees must be public safety officers.  


            In addition, if there is a class of employee - lifeguards  
            employed by various city, county, state park, or special  
            district employers - it is not clear why a "special law" is an  
            appropriate vehicle to provide this class of employees with  
            safety officer special benefits.  A general law, applicable to  
            the whole class of employees, may be more appropriate if, in  
            fact, these employees perform comparable peace officer duties  
            as the broader class of peace officers who receive this  
            benefit.


          GOVERNOR'S VETO MESSAGE:


          This bill adds full-time lifeguards employed by the City of  
          Oceanside to the list of employees who are entitled up to one  
          year of leave, paid at full salary without payroll tax  
          deductions, if they suffer an illness or injury that arises out  
          of their job duties.


          Recent data indicates public employers' costs related to this  
          disability leave benefit have increased at an alarming rate.   
          These cost figures give me pause to extend this benefit further  
          in state law.  If the City of Oceanside wishes to offer full  
          salary in lieu of temporary disability for one year to their  








                                                                    AB 1451


                                                                    Page  6





          regular full-time lifeguards, they are free to do so by means of  
          the collective bargaining process.  Eligibility for this benefit  
          is best left to the City of Oceanside, not the state, to  
          determine.




          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
          Mark Rakich / INS. / (916) 319-2086  FN: 0001356