BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES AND WATER Senator Fran Pavley, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Bill No: AB 1453 Hearing Date: August 11, 2016 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Author: |Bloom | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Version: |August 10, 2016 | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Urgency: |Yes |Fiscal: |Yes | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant:|William Craven | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Protection of orcas: unlawful activities. BACKGROUND AND EXISTING LAW 1) Prohibits the take of any whale species without specific authorization. Allows permits to be issued for take of a whale from the wild for a limited number of purposes, including for scientific research, for purpose of public display, or for enhancing the survival or recovery of specific stocks. Authorization can also be given for incidental take of marine mammals in the course of conducting certain activities. The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) is responsible for enforcement of the MMPA. Requirements for permits for public display include that the entity offers a program for education or conservation based on professionally recognized standards of the public display community, is registered or holds a license under the Animal Welfare Act, and maintains facilities open to the public on a regularly scheduled basis. 2) Governs captive care, handling, treatment and transportation of marine mammals held for public display, and maintenance of marine mammal exhibits, under the federal Animal Welfare Act. The Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is responsible for enforcement of the Animal Welfare Act. Standards for maintenance and structure of orca pools include: minimum horizontal dimension, volume and depth requirements; a plan AB 1453 (Rendon) Page 2 of ? of care approved by a veterinarian; and that animals be housed with at least one compatible animal of the same or biologically related species. Examples of pool dimensions include that a pool holding two orcas must have a minimum diameter of 48 feet, a depth of 12 feet, and a minimum volume of 615 meters. PROPOSED LAW This urgency bill prohibits captive breeding of orcas in California, and would allow the orcas that are currently being held in captivity after June 1, 2017, to be used only for educational presentations. This bill: 1) Makes it unlawful for any person to do any of the following: a) To hold an orca in captivity, whether wild-caught or captive-bred, for purposes of display, performance or entertainment. b) To breed or impregnate any orca in captivity in the state. c) To export, collect or import the semen, gametes, or embryos of an orca held in captivity for the purpose of artificial insemination. d) To export, transport, move or sell an orca located in the state to another state or country unless authorized by federal law. 2) Permits the transfer of an orca to another facility in North America that meets standards comparable to those in the Animal Welfare Act. 3) Makes any person who intentionally or negligently violates any of the above prohibitions guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine not to exceed $100,000. 4) Provides that this section does not apply to an orca that is held for rehabilitation after a rescue or stranding, or for research purposes and requires an orca that is held for rehabilitation or research to be returned to the wild whenever possible, and if return to the wild is not possible, prohibits such an orca from being used for breeding, performance or AB 1453 (Rendon) Page 3 of ? entertainment purposes. 5) Defines "educational presentation" for purposes of this bill to mean live, scheduled orca display in the presence of spectators that includes natural behaviors, enrichment and exercise activities and provides live narration and video content providing science-based education to the public about orcas. 6) Includes a severability clause, providing that if any of the provisions in the bill are invalidated, that the other provisions can be given effect. ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT The author indicates that while he wholeheartedly endorses SeaWorld's announcement to end captive breeding, company leadership can change and with it, so can company directions. The author asserts that the people of California and the animal welfare advocates who have been at the forefront in calling for this change need and deserve the assurance that codifying the end of captive breeding of orcas in California will bring. According to the animal welfare and environmental coalition letter in support, there are 11 orcas currently in San Diego representing the last generation of captive orcas that would be displayed in the state. Many supporters describe orcas as a very socially and ecologically complex species that are dependent on very close social bonding in their natural environment. ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION None received COMMENTS The Department of Fish and Wildlife, has requested clarifying language which is set forth in the two recommended amendments which would create a new Section 4502 (c) and a new 4502 (d) (3). AB 1453 (Rendon) Page 4 of ? SUPPORT Animal Legal Defense Fund Animal Welfare Society Azul Born Free USA California League of Conservation Voters Cetacean Society International Defenders of Wildlife Environment California Humane Society of the United States In Defense of Animals Marin Humane Society North County Watch Performing Animal Welfare Society San Francisco SPCA Sierra Club California Whale and Dolphin Conservation Wildlands Conservancy World Animal Protection Several individuals OPPOSITION None Received -- END --