BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 1517| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: AB 1517 Author: Committee on Banking and Finance Amended: 6/1/15 in Senate Vote: 21 SENATE BANKING & F.I. COMMITTEE: 7-0, 6/17/15 AYES: Block, Vidak, Galgiani, Hall, Hueso, Lara, Morrell SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: Senate Rule 28.8 ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 78-0, 5/14/15 (Consent) - See last page for vote SUBJECT: Business SOURCE: Author DIGEST: This bill makes changes intended to improve the ability of the Department of Business Oversight (DBO) to administer the laws under its jurisdiction. ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1)Contains several out-of-date references to the Department of Financial Institutions (DFI) and Department of Corporations (DOC), both of which were dissolved in July, 2013 through their merger into DBO. 2)Provides that it is unlawful for any person, in connection with the offer, sale, or purchase of a security, directly or AB 1517 Page 2 indirectly, to do any of the following: employ a device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; make an untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or engage in an act, practice, or course of business that operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon another person (Corporations Code Section 25401). 3)Includes two different and conflicting lengths of time in which a person issued a desist and refrain order pursuant to the California Commodity Law of 1990 has in which to appeal that order (30 days and one year; Corporations Code Section 29542). 4)Provides that, if a DBO licensee whose property and business have been taken by the Commissioner of Business Oversight (commissioner) is insured by a federal insurance agency, the commissioner may tender to that agency an appointment as conservator, liquidator, or receiver of the licensee. Further provides that if the federal agency accepts the appointment, it has the powers conferred on the commissioner pursuant to Article 2 of Chapter 7 of Division 1 of the Financial Code, in addition to any powers conferred by applicable federal law (Financial Code Section 620). 5)Caps the amount of funds that a bank or trust company may deposit in another financial institution other than a Federal Reserve Bank, at 10% of the sum of shareholders' equity, allowance for loan and lease losses, capital notes, and debentures of the depositing bank or trust company, unless the recipient financial institution has been designated as a depository for the funds of the depositing bank or trust company by a vote of the majority of the directors of that bank or trust company, and unless the financial institution has been approved by the commissioner as a depository (Financial Code Section 1008). 6)Defines facility for purposes of the Banking Law as an office in this state at which a bank engages in noncore banking business and does not engage in core banking business (Financial Code Section 1070). 7)Requires an industrial loan company whose certificate has been AB 1517 Page 3 surrendered or revoked to submit a closing audit report to the commissioner on or before 105 days following the effective date of the surrender or revocation, containing audited financial statements for the twelve months ending with the effective date of the surrender or revocation, or for such other period as the commissioner may specify (Financial Code Section 18405). This bill: 1)Makes technical changes to correct drafting errors, update code sections, reflect the merger of DFI and DOC into DBO, and reflect the shifting of certain responsibilities from the former DOC to the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC). 2)Returns the wording of the code section that prohibits fraudulent marketing of securities to the way in which it read prior to 2014, and, in doing so, provides that it is unlawful for any person to offer or sell a security in California, or to buy or offer to buy a security in California, by means of any written or oral communication that includes an untrue statement of a material fact or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which the statements were made, not misleading. 3)Clarifies that a person who is issued a desist and refrain order under the California Commodity Law of 1990 has 30 days in which to request a hearing to contest that order. 4)Provides that, if a federal insurance agency accepts appointment by the commissioner as conservator, liquidator, or receiver of a financial services licensee whose property and business have been seized by the commissioner, that federal agency shall have all of the powers conferred on the commissioner pursuant to Chapter 7 of Division 1 of the Financial Code, in addition to any powers conferred by applicable federal law. 5)Deletes a code section limiting the amount of funds that one bank or trust company may invest in another financial institution other than a Federal Reserve Bank. 6)Modifies the definition of facility for purposes of the AB 1517 Page 4 Banking Law to provide that facility means an office at which a bank engages in noncore banking business and does not engage in core banking business. 7)Deletes the requirement that an industrial loan company whose certificate has been surrendered or revoked submit a closing audit report to the commissioner within 105 days after the effective date of that surrender or revocation, as specified. Comments AB 1517 is intended to improve DBO's ability to administer the laws under its jurisdiction. This bill has six substantive provisions, each of which is described below. Several of the provisions correct inadvertent omissions and drafting errors contained in prior bills. Returns the wording of the code section that prohibits fraudulent marketing of securities to the way in which it read prior to 2014. SB 538 (Hill, Chapter 335, Statutes of 2013), a bill whose language originated with DOC, amended Corporations Code Section 25401. According to DBO, the language of Section 25401 in SB 538 was intended to mirror federal Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5. "However, the amendments inadvertently raised the burden of proof for civil and criminal litigation for Department attorneys and local prosecutors who try such cases. There is a substantial body of case law in California that may be disrupted if Section 25401 of the Corporations Code remains as is, potentially making enforcement and prosecution of securities fraud more difficult. There is additional concern that California courts will begin to rely on the federal interpretation of Rule 10b-5, which requires that plaintiffs prove scienter (i.e., that an offending party has knowledge of the wrongness of an act prior to committing it). This would provide less investor protections, since the burden of proof would fall on them and their legal representation." AB 1517 returns the wording of Section 25401 to the way in which it read prior to enactment of SB 538. DBO does not believe that language is needed to clarify the way in which Section 25401 should be interpreted during the period of time in which the changes enacted pursuant to SB 538 were operative. Amends the California Commodity Law of 1990 to correct an AB 1517 Page 5 inadvertent drafting error. Among its provisions, SB 538 amended the California Commodity Law of 1990 to specify that a person has 30 days, rather than one year, to request a hearing to dispute a desist and refrain order issued pursuant to that law. However, due to a drafting oversight, SB 538 failed to delete all references to the one year timeframe. AB 1517 corrects the unintended drafting error and ensures that the California Commodity Law of 1990 is consistent in referring to 30 days as the period of time in which a persons served a desist and refrain order under that law have in which to request a hearing to appeal that order. Deletes a code section that was previously repealed, then inadvertently re-added to the Financial Code. Financial Code Section 1008 caps the amount of funds that one bank or trust company may invest in another financial institution other than a Federal Reserve Bank at 10%, except as specified. According to DBO, Federal Reserve Board Regulation F, which is applicable to all depository institutions insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), already sets limits on the amount of funds that may be deposited by one institution into another institution. DBO believes that Financial Code Section 1008 is unnecessary, because all financial institutions licensed by DBO are subject to Federal Reserve Board Regulation F. Furthermore, the code section that AB 1517 repeals was already repealed once before by the Legislature. The language currently contained in Financial Code Section 1008 was repealed by AB 1301 (Gaines, Chapter 125, Statutes of 2008), then mistakenly reinserted by AB 1268 (Gaines, Chapter 532, Statutes of 2010) and renumbered by SB 664 (Committee on Banking and Financial Institutions, Chapter 243, Statutes of 2011). Amends the definition of facility under the Banking Law. AB 1517 amends the definition of a facility to mean an office (not an office in this state) at which a bank engages in noncore banking business, but at which it does not engage in core banking business. This change also corrects an inadvertent drafting error resulting from the enactment of AB 1301. Prior to the enactment of AB 1301, state-chartered banks were able to open offices outside of California under the supervision of DFI. The inadvertent addition of the words "in this state" by AB 1301 limited the establishment, relocation, designation, or discontinuance of a facility to offices and branches in AB 1517 Page 6 California. Striking "in this state" will restore the authority of California state-chartered banks to establish, relocate, designate, or discontinue facilities in another state or country and the authority of DBO to regulate those facilities. Deletes the requirement that an industrial loan company whose certificate has been surrendered or revoked submit a closing audit report. According to DBO, the requirement that this bill deletes is both unnecessary and seldom complied with. The financial well-being of industrial loan companies is already monitored by the commissioner through the requirement that industrial loan companies submit quarterly, unaudited financial statements and annual, audited financial statements to the commissioner. Licensees that are in the process of closing their business are reluctant to pay for the final, audited financial statement required by existing law, and many do not. When an industrial loan company fails to submit its final, closing audit, the only recourse available to the commissioner is to revoke the license of that licensee. This threat means little to the companies, as they are exiting the business line anyway, and it imposes unnecessary costs on DBO. Reinstates the power of the commissioner to appoint the FDIC as conservator, liquidator, or receiver of a bank insured by that federal agency. Prior to enactment of SB 664, California law clearly stated that the FDIC, as a conservator, liquidator, or receiver, was granted all of the rights and powers of the commissioner under Article 8, Liquidation and Conservation. However, when SB 664 reorganized and renumbered several Financial Code sections, the wording of Financial Code Section 620 was not updated to reflect that reorganization. This had the inadvertent effect of limiting the FDIC's powers when acting as conservator, liquidator or receiver. AB 1517 corrects this drafting error by replacing the reference to "this article" with a reference to "this chapter," thus restoring these powers to the FDIC. Related/Prior Legislation SB 538 (Hill, Chapter 335, Statutes of 2013) made changes intended to improve the ability of DBO to administer the laws under its jurisdiction. AB 1317 (Frazier, Chapter 352, Statutes of 2013) and SB 820 AB 1517 Page 7 (Committee on Governmental Organization, Chapter 353, Statutes of 2013) updated numerous code sections to reflect the merger of DFI and DOC into DBO, pursuant to Government Reorganization Plan 2. AB 1301 (Gaines, Chapter 125, Statutes of 2008), AB 2749 (Gaines, Chapter 501, Statutes of 2008), AB 1268 (Gaines, Chapter 532, Statutes of 2010), and SB 664 (Committee on Banking and Financial Institutions, Chapter 243, Statutes of 2011) updated, modernized, and renumbered provisions of the Financial Code administered by DFI. AB 78 (Gallegos, Chapter 525, Statutes of 1999) established DMHC and transferred the healthcare programs administered by DOC to DMHC. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:YesLocal: No SUPPORT: (Verified6/29/15) None received OPPOSITION: (Verified6/29/15) None received ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 78-0, 5/14/15 AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins AB 1517 Page 8 NO VOTE RECORDED: Linder, Medina Prepared by:Eileen Newhall / B. & F.I. / (916) 651-4102 6/30/15 13:53:43 **** END ****