BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                      AB 1526


                                                                      Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          1526 (Committee on Aging and Long-Term Care)


          As Introduced  March 16, 2015


          Majority vote


          


           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Committee       |Votes |Ayes                 |Noes                 |
          |                |      |                     |                     |
          |                |      |                     |                     |
          |----------------+------+---------------------+---------------------|
          |Aging           |6-0   |Brown, Hadley, Gray, |                     |
          |                |      |Levine, Lopez,       |                     |
          |                |      |Mathis               |                     |
          |                |      |                     |                     |
          |----------------+------+---------------------+---------------------|
          |Health          |13-0  |Bonta, Maienschein,  |                     |
          |                |      |Burke, Chiu, Gomez,  |                     |
          |                |      |Lackey, Nazarian,    |                     |
          |                |      |Patterson,           |                     |
          |                |      |                     |                     |
          |                |      |                     |                     |
          |                |      |Ridley-Thomas,       |                     |
          |                |      |Rodriguez,           |                     |
          |                |      |Steinorth, Waldron,  |                     |
          |                |      |Wood                 |                     |
          |                |      |                     |                     |
          |----------------+------+---------------------+---------------------|
          |Appropriations  |17-0  |Gomez, Bigelow,      |                     |








                                                                      AB 1526


                                                                      Page  2





          |                |      |Bonta, Calderon,     |                     |
          |                |      |Chang, Daly, Eggman, |                     |
          |                |      |Gallagher, Eduardo   |                     |
          |                |      |Garcia, Gordon,      |                     |
          |                |      |Holden, Jones,       |                     |
          |                |      |Quirk, Rendon,       |                     |
          |                |      |Wagner, Weber, Wood  |                     |
          |                |      |                     |                     |
          |                |      |                     |                     |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 


          SUMMARY:  Directs the Department of Public Health (DPH), beginning  
          January 1, 2016, to include the federal Centers for Disease  
          Control and Prevention's (CDC) Caregiver Module in the annual  
          Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey.  


          Background:  The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System  
          (BRFSS) is a cross-sectional telephone survey that state health  
          departments conduct with a standardized questionnaire, and  
          technical and methodological assistance from CDC.  BRFSS is used  
          to collect prevalence data among United States residents regarding  
          behaviors that create health risks, as well as preventive  
          practices that reduce health risks.  Data is forwarded to CDC,  
          aggregated for each state, returned with standard tabulations, and  
          published at year's end.  In 2011, more than 500,000 interviews  
          were conducted nationwide.  By collecting behavioral health risk  
          data at the state and local level, BRFSS has become a powerful  
          tool for targeting and building health promotion activities.  As a  
          result, BRFSS users have increasingly demanded more data and asked  
          for more questions on the survey.  


          BRFSS Caregiver Module:  Beginning in 2009, a special set of 10  
          questions have been available to examine various aspects of  
          caregiving, referred to as the "Caregiver Module."  The questions  
          allow states to determine who is a caregiver; the relationship  
          between the caregiver and the care recipient; the average hours of  








                                                                      AB 1526


                                                                      Page  3





          caregiving per week; the most difficult problem facing the  
          caregiver; the age and gender of the care recipient; the types of  
          assistance needed by the care recipient; the major health problem,  
          long-term illness, or disability of the care recipient; the  
          duration of caregiving; and whether the person has had more  
          difficulty with thinking or remembering in the past year.  The  
          responses from the caregiver module are then paired with  
          information from the main BRFSS questionnaire, which allow for  
          additional information about the health and well-being of  
          caregivers.  


          Caregiving:  California is home to the largest number of seniors  
          in the nation and their numbers are expanding at a pace  
          unprecedented in history.  Caregivers support the needs of  
          dependent individuals in a variety of ways, performing a range of  
          tasks, including companionship, light house-keeping, meal  
          preparation, and personal care to name just a few.  More complex  
          and sensitive tasks include money management, medication  
          management, communicating with health professionals, and  
          coordinating care.  The Family Caregiver Alliance finds that many  
          family members and friends do not consider such assistance and  
          care "caregiving" - they are just doing what comes naturally to  
          them: taking care of someone they love.  But that care may be  
          required for months or years, and may take an emotional, physical  
          and financial toll on caregiving families.  


          The value of the services family caregivers provide for "free,"  
          when caring, was estimated to be $450 billion in 2009.  The  
          estimated value of unpaid care in California is $47 billion,  
          accounting for over 3.8 billion hours of care.  On the personal  
          side, long-term caregiving has significant financial consequences  
          for caregivers, particularly for women.  Informal caregivers  
          personally lose about $659,139 over a lifetime:  $25,494 in Social  
          Security benefits; $67,202 in pension benefits; and $566,443 in  
          forgone wages.  Caregivers face the loss of income of the care  
          recipient, loss of their own income if they reduce their work  
          hours or leave their jobs, loss of employer-based medical  








                                                                      AB 1526


                                                                      Page  4





          benefits, shrinking of savings to pay caregiving costs, and a  
          threat to their retirement income due to fewer contributions to  
          pensions and other retirement vehicles.  


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Committee on  
          Appropriations, General Fund (GF) costs to CDPH of $150,000 GF per  
          year for five years, assuming costs stay the same over the five  
          year period.


          Analysis Prepared by:                                               
                          Robert MacLaughlin / AGING & L.T.C. / (916)  
                          319-3990                                            
          FN: 0000619