BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 1568


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  May 18, 2016


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                               Lorena Gonzalez, Chair


          AB  
          1568 (Bonta) - As Amended May 3, 2016


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Health                         |Vote:|17 - 0       |
          |Committee:   |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  Yes State Mandated Local Program:  NoReimbursable:  No


          SUMMARY:


          This bill, which contains an urgency clause, authorizes the  
          Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to implement the  
          Medi-Cal 2020 Demonstration Project, implementing the Special  
          Terms and Conditions (STCs) negotiated with and approved by the  
          federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).   
          Specifically, this bill:


          1)Specifies the four components of Medi-Cal 2020, as follows:  


             a)   Global Payment Program (GPP), which restructures the  
               distribution of federal funding for uncompensated care,  
               including disproportionate share hospitals (DSH) funding,  






                                                                    AB 1568


                                                                    Page  2





               to designated public hospitals (DPHs), excluding University  
               of California (UC) hospitals, in order to incentivize  
               improvements in care delivery and provision of care in  
               appropriate settings. The bill maintains the DSH funding  
               methodology for other hospitals, with DSH funding for UC  
               hospitals capped by fiscal year.  


             b)   Public Hospital Redesign and Incentives in Medi-Cal  
               (PRIME), which authorizes federal matching funds to make  
               incentive payments to DPHs and District/Municipal Public  
               Hospitals (DMPHs), in order to improve care delivery and  
               strengthen their ability to take on risk-based payments. 


             c)   Whole Person Care (WPC), which allows participating lead  
               entities (primarily counties) to claim federal matching  
               funds for efforts to coordinate health, behavioral health,  
               and social services for high-risk Medi-Cal beneficiaries  
               who are high utilizers of health care services.   


             d)   Dental Transformation Initiative (DTI), which permits  
               incentive payments to qualified dental providers to improve  
               dental care and utilization among children enrolled in  
               Medi-Cal.


          2)Requires a comprehensive assessment of access to care in  
            Medi-Cal, as specified.


          3)Contains a number of administrative provisions, including an  
            exemption for DHCS from the regulatory process, exemption of  
            contracts from the Public Contract Code and approval by  
            Department of General Services, and authorization for the  
            director of DHCS to modify any process or methodology if  
            necessary to comply with federal law or the STCs, among other  
            provisions. 








                                                                    AB 1568


                                                                    Page  3





          4)Conditions implementation on federal approval and availability  
            of federal financial participation (FFP).


          5)Authorizes the nonfederal share of matching funds for the DTI  
            through a fund swap, whereby DHCS may claim FFP for state  
            expenditures on Designated State Health Programs (DSHPs), as  
            specified, and appropriates an amount of GF equal to such FFP  
            to the Health Care Deposit Fund for purposes of the DTI, as  
            specified.


          6)Authorizes the continuation of numerous authorities and  
            programs approved in prior waivers, as specified, including  
            continuation of current Medi-Cal fee-for-service payment  
            methodologies for DPHs from the previous waiver, whereby DPHs  
            receive cost-based reimbursement with county expenditures used  
            to draw down federal matching funds.


          7)Contains numerous other provisions and details related to  
            waiver implementation. 


          FISCAL EFFECT:


          1)DHCS has requested administrative resources through an April  
            2016 Spring Finance Letter totaling $33.6 million for waiver  
            implementation over its five-year lifetime, $14 million of  
            which is for contract costs.  DHCS requests $10.8 million in  
            2016-17.  Funding will pay for staff and contract costs for  
            implementation, monitoring, oversight, evaluation and  
            assessment, technical assistance, program development, and  
            related activities (GF/federal). 


          2)Federal matching funds available by waiver program component  
            are as follows:








                                                                    AB 1568


                                                                    Page  4






              PRIME                           $3.73 billion


                 Global Payment Program(GPP)$236 million* 


                 Dental Transformation Initiative (DTI)$375 million


                 Designated State Health Programs$375 million


                 Whole Person Care (WPC)    $1.5 billion 


            --------------------------------------------------------------- 
            ---------------


                 Total                    $6.21 billion


            


            * GPP does not include the federal Disproportionate Share  
            Hospitals (DSH) component of funding. Federal DSH funding over  
            the five-year life of the waiver is projected to be about $5.8  
            billion.  In addition, only the first year of federal funding  
            for GPP is shown here.  Funding in subsequent years is based  
            on a study on DPH uncompensated care.
          COMMENTS:


          1)Purpose. According to the author, while the STCs outline the  
            programmatic and financing elements of Medi-Cal 2020, this  
            bill is needed to provide the statutory framework.  In  
            addition, this bill would grant flexibility to DHCS to  
            implement Medi-Cal 2020 without using the regular contracting  
            and regulatory processes due to waiver timelines, and would  






                                                                    AB 1568


                                                                    Page  5





            require notification to the Legislature regarding  
            waiver-related activities.  Numerous health care provider and  
            advocacy groups support this bill, and it has no opposition. 


          2)Federal Medicaid Waivers. Section 1115 of the federal Social  
            Security Act authorizes the federal government to waive  
            certain Medicaid rules.  This authority has been used in order  
            to allow states to test innovative program improvements and to  
            facilitate coverage expansions. To obtain a waiver, a state  
            negotiates with CMS about which Medicaid provisions might be  
            waived, what innovations the state is proposing, and how the  
            state plans to achieve budget neutrality (a requirement that  
            waivers cannot cost the federal government more with the  
            waiver than without the waiver).  The negotiations are  
            memorialized in the STCs, which constitute a contract between  
            CMS and the state.  In addition, the state adopts authorizing  
            legislation, such as this bill, to implement the waiver. 





            Recent waivers have included the 2005 waiver, which  
            established Medi-Cal's public hospital funding mechanisms and  
            provided for coverage expansions in certain counties, and the  
            2010 "Bridge to Reform" waiver, which included, among other  
            provisions, a phased implementation of health care reform  
            through early expansion of Medi-Cal at local option,  
            expansions of managed care, and a precursor to the PRIME  
            program for public hospitals called the delivery system reform  
            incentive pool (DSRIP). 


          1)California's new 1115 Waiver: Medi-Cal 2020.  On December 30,  
            2015, DHCS received CMS approval of the five-year Medi-Cal  
            2020 waiver, which began January 1, 2016. Medi-Cal 2020 is  
            anticipated to provide $6.2 billion in federal matching funds  
            over the five years of the waiver, as specified above. The  
            details of Medi-Cal 2020 are in the 300+ page STCs and related  
            attachments agreed to by the state and CMS. DHCS sought  






                                                                    AB 1568


                                                                    Page  6





            significant stakeholder involvement in the development of the  
            waiver.  The WPC, the DTI, and the GPP programs are new  
            components of this waiver, while the PRIME program is a  
            redesign of a prior program.  


          2)Non-federal share of Costs. The waiver does not "provide"  
            federal funds, but allows states to claim federal matching  
            funds for designated programs and services that would  
            otherwise not qualify.  The nonfederal share of costs for  
            Medi-Cal 2020 waiver programs are provided through various  
            means, as indicated below.  


             a)   Intergovernmental transfers (IGTs). IGTs are transfers  
               of public funds between governmental entities, such as from  
               a county to the state. The nonfederal share of PRIME and  
               GPP will be funded by transfers of funds from public  
               hospitals to the state, whereby the state will match the  
               transfer with federal funds and remit the local funds, with  
               matching federal funds, back to the hospital.  The  
               nonfederal share for the WPC pilots is likely to be funded  
               by counties through transfers of local revenues.  


             b)   Certified Public Expenditures (CPEs). Under a CPE  
               arrangement, government providers certify their Medicaid  
               expenditures to the state, and the state then obtains  
               federal reimbursement on the basis of the CPEs. Under the  
               state's prior two waivers as well as this one, DPHs use  
               CPEs to claim federal matching funds for services provided  
               to Medi-Cal beneficiaries on a fee-for-service basis.   


             c)   General Fund (GF). GF provides the nonfederal share for  
               programs being continued under this waiver, including  
               Medi-Cal managed care and the Coordinated Care Initiative.   
               In addition, the waiver allows the state to claim federal  
               matching funds for spending on State Designated Health  
               Programs, which are various state-funded health programs  
               specified in the STCs. This essentially frees up an equal  






                                                                    AB 1568


                                                                    Page  7





               amount of GF, which is used to fund the nonfederal share  
               for the DTI. 


          3)Related Legislation. SB 815 (Hernández) is similar to this  
            bill, and is pending in the Senate Appropriations Committee.


          Analysis Prepared by:Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081