BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 1639


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  April 5, 2016


                           ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY


                                  Mark Stone, Chair


          AB 1639  
          (Maienschein) - As Amended March 29, 2016


                    PROPOSED CONSENT (As Proposed to be Amended)


          SUBJECT:  PUPIL HEALTH: SUDDEN CARDIAC ARREST PREVENTION ACT


          KEY ISSUE:  SHOULD ATHLETIC DIRECTORS, COACHES, AND ATHLETIC  
          TRAINERS BE REQUIRED TO IMMEDIATELY REMOVE A PUPIL WHO PASSES  
          OUT OR FAINTS WHILE PARTICIPATING IN A SCHOOL-SPONSORED ATHLETIC  
          ACTIVITY FROM THE ACTIVITY, AND PROHIBIT THE PUPIL FROM  
          RETURNING TO THE ACTIVITY, UNTIL CLEARED BY A MEDICAL  
          PROFESSIONAL? 


                                      SYNOPSIS


          According to the author, "Sudden Cardiac Arrest (SCA) has  
          emerged as a leading cause of death among people under age 25.  
          According to the American Heart Association, SCA affects nearly  
          10,000 youth per year."  The author's office also states that 72  
          percent of those who have suffered SCA experienced prior  
          symptoms but did not recognize them as warning signs.  The  
          sponsor of this bill, the Eric Paredes Save a Life Foundation,  
          seeks to make more people aware of these warning signs, in the  
          hopes that it will provide the opportunity to prevent fatal  








                                                                    AB 1639


                                                                    Page  2





          cardiac events.  California has existing laws that regulate  
          athletic activities and requirements for coaches, including  
          limits on the number of football full-contact practices and  
          requirements for coaches to attend a coaching education program.  
           The safety protocols established by this bill are similar to  
          safety protocols for concussions in interscholastic sports,  
          which were established following increasing awareness of the  
          dangers of head injuries.  For the reasons discussed in the  
          analysis, the author has reasonably agreed to remove the  
          immunity provision from the bill.  The author also proposes a  
          clarifying amendment to specify which medical providers are able  
          to provide clearance to a student's return to play.  This  
          non-controversial bill is supported by numerous heart health  
          advocacy organizations, as well as diverse groups such as the  
          Association of California School Administrators; California  
          School Nurses Organization; California State PTA; and the  
          Consumer Attorneys of California.  It has no known opposition.




          SUMMARY:  Seeks to provide additional information, training, and  
          emergency intervention protocols at schools in order to reduce  
          the risk of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) among students.   
          Specifically, this bill, in its provisions most relevant to this  
          Committee:  


          1)Requires the California Department of Education (Department)  
            to post on its Internet Web site guidelines, videos, and an  
            information sheet on SCA symptoms and warning signs, and other  
            relevant materials to inform and educate pupils and parents,  
            and to train coaches about the nature and warning signs of  
            sudden cardiac arrest, including the risks associated with  
            continuing to play or practice after experiencing fainting or  
            seizures during exercise, unexplained shortness of breath,  
            chest pains, dizziness, racing heart rate, or extreme fatigue.  
             
          2)Requires that a pupil who passes out or faints while  








                                                                    AB 1639


                                                                    Page  3





            participating in or immediately following an athletic  
            activity, or who is known to have passed out or fainted while  
            participating in or immediately following an athletic  
            activity, shall be removed from participation at that time by  
            the athletic director, coach, or athletic trainer.


          3)Provides that a pupil who exhibits any of the other symptoms  
            of sudden cardiac arrest, described in 1), above, during an  
            athletic activity, may be removed from participation by an  
            athletic trainer, if the athletic trainer reasonably believes  
            that the symptoms are cardiac related. 


          4)Requires, in the absence of an athletic trainer, any coach who  
            observes any of the symptoms of sudden cardiac arrest to  
            notify the parent or guardian of the pupil so that the parent  
            or guardian can determine what treatment, if any, the pupil  
            should seek.


          5)Prohibits a pupil who is removed from play pursuant to 2) or  
            3), above, from participating in an athletic activity until  
            the pupil is evaluated and cleared to return to participate in  
            writing by a licensed health care provider.


          6)Requires a coach of an athletic activity to complete the  
            sudden cardiac arrest training course and to retake the  
            training course every two years thereafter.


          7)Provides that a coach of an athletic activity shall not be  
            eligible to coach an athletic activity until the coach  
            completes the training course required in 6), above.  


          8)Provides that, on and after July 1, 2019, a coach who violates  
            the training requirements in 6), above is subject to  








                                                                    AB 1639


                                                                    Page  4





            suspension from coaching any athletic activity until  
            completion of the required training.


          9)Defines two relevant terms:


             a)   "Athletic activity" (defined to include interscholastic  
               athletics; an athletic contest or competition, other than  
               interscholastic athletics, that is sponsored by a school,  
               including cheerleading and club-sponsored sports  
               activities; noncompetitive cheerleading that is sponsored  
               by a school; practices, interscholastic practices, and  
               scrimmages for all of the activities listed above).
             b)   "School" (a public school, including a charter school,  
               or private school that elects to conduct athletic  
               activities).  


          1)Makes this article operative on July 1, 2017.


          EXISTING LAW: 


          1)Provides that everyone is responsible, not only for the result  
            of his or her willful acts, but also for an injury occasioned  
            to another by his or her want of ordinary care or skill in the  
            management of his or her property or person, except so far as  
            the latter has, willfully or by want of ordinary care, brought  
            the injury upon himself or herself.  (Civil Code Section 1714  
            (a).)
          2)Requires a school district, charter school, or private school  
            that elects to offer an athletic program, to comply with both  
            of the following:


             a)   Immediately remove an athlete who is suspected of  
               sustaining a concussion or head injury in an athletic  








                                                                    AB 1639


                                                                    Page  5





               activity from the athletic activity for the remainder of  
               the day and do the following: 


               i)     Not allow the athlete to return to the athletic  
                 activity until he or she is evaluated by a "licensed  
                 health care provider" (defined as a "licensed health care  
                 provider who is trained in the management of concussions  
                 and is acting within the scope of his or her practice"). 


               ii)    Not allow the athlete to return to the athletic  
                 activity until he or she receives written clearance to  
                 return to the athletic activity from a licensed health  
                 care provider. 


               iii)   Ensure that any athlete who sustained a concussion  
                 or a head injury also complete a graduated return-to-play  
                 protocol of no less than seven days in duration under the  
                 supervision of a licensed health care provider.


             b)   On a yearly basis, require a concussion and head injury  
               information sheet to be signed and returned by the athlete  
               and the athlete's parent or guardian before the athlete  
               initiates practice or competition.  (Education Code Section  
               49475.  All further statutory references are to this code,  
               unless otherwise indicated.)


          3)Requires a school district, county office of education, or  
            charter school to ensure that each employee who volunteers to  
            be trained and to provide emergency medical assistance with an  
            epinephrine auto-injector (epi-pen) and to provide the  
            volunteer with legal defense and indemnification for any and  
            all civil liability associated with use of the device.   
            (Section 49414 (j).)









                                                                    AB 1639


                                                                    Page  6






          4)Requires that a school district, county office of education,  
            or charter school which elects to allow employees who  
            volunteer to be trained and provide emergency medical  
            assistance with epilepsy anti-seizure medication, to provide  
            the volunteer with legal defense and indemnification for any  
            and all civil liability associated with use of the medication.  
             (Section 49414.7 (i).)


          5)Provides that an employee of a school district who volunteers  
            to be trained and renders emergency care or treatment through  
            the use, attempted use, or nonuse of an automated external  
            defibrillator (AED) at the scene of an emergency is not liable  
            for any civil damages resulting from any act or omission in  
            the rendering of the emergency care or treatment.  (Section  
            49417 (b).)


          6)Provides that if a public school or school district complies  
            with the requirements for training and installation of an AED  
            on its premises, the public school or school district shall  
            not be liable for any civil damages resulting from any act or  
            omission in the rendering of the emergency care or treatment  
            with the AED.  (Section 49417 (c).)


          7)Exempts from the provisions of 5), and 6), above, any case in  
            which personal injury or wrongful death results from gross  
            negligence or willful or wanton misconduct on the part of the  
            person who uses, attempts to use, or maliciously fails to use  
            an AED to render emergency care or treatment.  (Section 49417  
            (d).)


          FISCAL EFFECT:  As currently in print this bill is keyed fiscal.


          COMMENTS:  According to the author, "Sudden Cardiac Arrest (SCA)  








                                                                    AB 1639


                                                                    Page  7





          has emerged as a leading cause of death among people under age  
          25. According to the American Heart Association, SCA affects  
          nearly 10,000 youth per year."  The author's office also states  
          that 72 percent of those who have suffered SCA experienced prior  
          symptoms but did not recognize them as warning signs.  The  
          sponsor of this bill, the Eric Paredes Save a Life Foundation,  
          seeks to make more people aware of these warning signs, in the  
          hopes that it will provide the opportunity to prevent fatal  
          cardiac events.


          Eric Paredes, for whom the sponsor organization was named, was a  
          young athlete who died from a sudden cardiac arrest while at  
          home. Eric's parents hope to use the story of their son's death,  
          and those of other young athletes, to bring attention to heart  
          screening and possible warning signs they say could save the  
          lives of other children.  The Foundation has worked extensively  
          to produce and distribute information on SCA, and to promote  
          training videos for coaches.


          Existing Safety Standards for Risky Athletic Activities and  
          Penalties for Noncompliance.  California has existing laws that  
          regulate athletic activities and requirements for coaches,  
          including limits on the number of football full-contact  
          practices and requirements for coaches to attend a coaching  
          education program.  The safety protocols established by this  
          bill are similar to safety protocols for concussions in  
          interscholastic sports, which were established following  
          increasing awareness of the dangers of head injuries. Current  
          law requires the removal of "an athlete who is suspected of  
          sustaining a concussion or head injury in an athletic activity  
          from the athletic activity for the remainder of the day."   
          (Section 49475.)  It also requires the school district, charter  
          school, or private school to do the following: not allow the  
          athlete to return to the athletic activity until he or she is  
          evaluated by a "licensed health care provider" (defined as a  
          "licensed health care provider who is trained in the management  
          of concussions and is acting within the scope of his or her  








                                                                    AB 1639


                                                                    Page  8





          practice"); not allow the athlete to return to the athletic  
          activity until he or she receives written clearance to return to  
          the athletic activity from a licensed health care provider;  
          ensure that any athlete who sustained a concussion or a head  
          injury also complete a graduated return-to-play protocol of no  
          less than seven days in duration under the supervision of a  
          licensed health care provider.  (Ibid.)  There is no penalty on  
          coaches (or other school personnel) for non-compliance and no  
          immunity for school personnel who act (or do not act) pursuant  
          to the law.


          The CIF, working with a panel of medical professionals,  
          established policies related to SCA which went into effect in  
          2015.  These policies cover most students playing  
          interscholastic sports, including 1,600 schools with 1.8 million  
          students.  CIF added SCA information to their existing training  
          requirements for coaches.  The CIF also added protocols similar  
          to those in this bill. They include removal from athletic  
          activity after a pupil passes out or faints during or right  
          after activity, with a medical clearance required to return to  
          activity.  Similarly, pupils must be cleared if they are held  
          out for exhibiting signs or symptoms associated with SCA.  The  
          policy requires a pupil and his or her parent or guardian to  
          receive and sign a Sudden Cardiac Information sheet each year.   
          Given that the CIF implemented coaching training rules and a  
          protocol for SCA in 2015, many of the informational and care  
          guidelines in this bill already apply to the great majority of  
          student athletes.  However, the CIF rules do not apply to the  
          other (non-CIF) activities covered by this bill: athletic  
          contests or competitions, other than interscholastic athletics,  
          that is sponsored by a school, including cheerleading and  
          club-sponsored sports activities; noncompetitive cheerleading  
          that is sponsored by a school.


          As originally in print, this bill contained sanctions for  
          coaches who did not follow the guidelines for removal of a  
          student and allowing such a student to return to play.  As  








                                                                    AB 1639


                                                                    Page  9





          recently amended (in the Assembly Education Committee), those  
          penalties were removed from the bill.  According to that  
          Committee's analysis: 


               The CIF protocol on SCA does not contain sanctions.   
               According to the CIF, coaches are employees of the school  
               district, not the CIF.  Existing law for concussions also  
               do not contain sanctions. While current law on coaches  
               speaks of the need for coaches to be trained in safety,  
               including cardiopulmonary resuscitation requirements, it is  
               silent on punishments for noncompliance in any area.


          Immunity Provisions for Volunteers who Provide Emergency Medical  
          Care in Schools.  Existing state law provides qualified immunity  
          to school personnel who volunteer to be trained to administer  
          emergency medical assistance in some circumstances.  It also  
          requires the employers of these volunteers - a school district,  
          county office of education, or charter school -to provide them  
          with legal defense and indemnification for any and all civil  
          liability associated with providing emergency medical care.  For  
          example, school personnel who agree to be trained to use an  
          epinephrine auto-injector (Section 49414 (j)); epilepsy  
          anti-seizure medication (Section 49414.7 (i)); or an automated  
          external defibrillator (AED) (Section 49417 (b)) have immunity  
          from civil liability for the administration of emergency medical  
          assistance, as well as the right to defense by the employer; and  
          the right to indemnification.  The only exceptions (which makes  
          the immunity "qualified") are cases in which personal injury or  
          wrongful death results from gross negligence or willful or  
          wanton misconduct on the part of the person who uses, attempts  
          to use, or maliciously fails to render emergency care or  
          treatment.  


          The rationale for these provisions in the Education Code is  
          presumably to encourage volunteers, who otherwise would have no  
          duty to be trained or to provide emergency medical care, to do  








                                                                    AB 1639


                                                                    Page  10





          so.  This is similar to the rationale in the Civil Code for  
          providing immunity to persons who are trained to administer CPR.  
           Such immunity is intended to "encourage citizens to participate  
          in emergency medical services training programs and to render  
          emergency medical services to fellow citizens" (Civil Code  
          Section 1714.2 (a).)  




          The same rationale does not apply to the provisions of this  
          bill, which require coaches (as well as athletic directors and  
          athletic trainers) to intervene when a student-athlete shows  
          symptoms of SCA.  However, as explained below, such provisions  
          are unnecessary and superfluous, at least for coaches, athletic  
          directors, and athletic trainers who are public employees,  
          because those employees are already immune for discretionary  
          decisions (such as whether or not to remove an athlete from  
          competition).  Therefore, it does not seem reasonable or  
          necessary to provide them with additional express immunity for  
          doing (or not doing) so.




          General Governmental Immunity for Coaches (and Other Public  
          Employees).  In general, a civil action against a public  
          employee is not possible when the damages are caused by an act  
          or omission of the employee while exercising the discretion  
          vested in the employee.  (Government Code Section 820.2.)  In  
          fact, "public employees are immune for their discretionary acts,  
          even those which constitute breaches of actionable duty, unless  
          a statute otherwise provides. ? This ? can only be achieved by a  
          clear indication of legislative intent that statutory immunity  
          is withheld or withdrawn in the particular case" [Citation  
          deleted].  (Conn v. Western Placer Unified School Dist. (2010)  
          186 Cal.App.4th 1163, 1179.)  An employee is required to  
          "indemnify the public entity" only in instances where the  
          employee acted outside the scope of his employment or "acted  








                                                                    AB 1639


                                                                    Page  11





          with actual fraud, corruption, or malice."  (Connelly v. State  
          (1970) 3 Cal.App.3d 744, 750 [84 Cal.Rptr. 257].)  A  
          discretionary act is one that calls for the exercise of judgment  
          (i.e., discretion), weighing of evidence and consideration of  
          advantages and disadvantages of making a decision or taking  
          action, such as a board's decision whether or not a worker is  
          permanently disabled and therefore unable to return to work  
          (Masters v. San Bernardino County Employees Retirement Assn.  
          (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 30, 46-47); or a social service worker's  
          investigation regarding the suitability of prospective adoptive  
          parents (Ronald S. v. County of San Diego (1993) 16 Cal. App.  
          4th 887, 897).  




          The type of decisions that would have to be made under the  
          provisions of this bill - whether the pupil passed out or  
          fainted during or immediately after an athletic activity;  
          whether the pupil exhibits any symptoms of SCA during an  
          athletic activity; whether the symptoms are cardiac related;  
          whether to notify the parent or guardian - involve judgment  
          calls that are typical of those made by school personnel,  
          especially coaches.  They are also very similar to the  
          discretionary decisions that are made regarding student athletes  
          who obtain concussions.  A court would almost certainly consider  
          them to be "discretionary act" for purposes of the immunity  
          provisions in Government Code Section 820.2.  Therefore,  
          additional express immunity is not necessary for athletic  
          directors, coaches, or athletic trainers.


          Duty of Care - Coaches Engaged in Coaching.  While a school  
          athletic coach has a duty of care to a student-athlete, "because  
          a significant part of an instructor's or coach's role is to  
          challenge or 'push' a student or athlete to advance his or her  
          skill level and to undertake more difficult tasks, and because  
          the fulfillment of such a role could be improperly chilled by  
          too stringent a standard of potential legal liability," coaches  








                                                                    AB 1639


                                                                    Page  12





          can engage in somewhat more risky behavior without breaching  
          that duty.  (Kahn v. East Side Union High School Dist. (2003) 31  
          Cal. 4th 990, 996.)  "A sports instructor may be found to have  
          breached a duty of care to a student or athlete only if the  
          instructor intentionally injures the student or engages in  
          conduct that is reckless in the sense that it is "totally  
          outside the range of the ordinary activity" [citation omitted]  
          involved in teaching or coaching the sport."  (Ibid.)


          But naturally, this special permissive standard for athletic  
          coaches, allowing them to push students to engage in what would  
          otherwise be dangerous activities only applies when they are -  
          as the Kahn court observed - "involved in teaching or coaching  
          the sport."  If a coach were also an English teacher, he or she  
          is held to the same standard of care as other teachers when  
          teaching.  The status of a coach would not allow the teacher to  
          encourage students to engage in inherently risky behavior in the  
          classroom under the guise of "pushing" students to undertake  
          more difficult tasks by advancing their skill level.  The same  
          is also true of a coach acting as a coach, but engaging in  
          activities other than encouraging students to advance their  
          skills, such as observing whether or not a student athlete  
          exhibits the signs and symptoms of SCA, or whether or not the  
          student fainted during or immediately after an athletic  
                    activity.  In those cases, the coach would have a regular duty  
          of care, rather than the relaxed version of that duty.


          This bill does not seek to address the role of the coach while  
          pushing a student-athlete to take chances and try new activities  
          or risky maneuvers to develop the athlete's skills.  Rather,  
          this bill requires coaches to get training and to pull an  
          athlete out of the game or practice if he or she passes out,  
          faints, or shows signs of cardiac arrest.  Therefore, the coach  
          would have a regular duty of care towards the student.  Any  
          coach who did not remove a pupil from competition after the  
          pupil passed out or showed signs of cardiac arrest would likely  
          be deemed reckless or grossly negligent by a judge or jury,  








                                                                    AB 1639


                                                                    Page  13





          regardless of the provisions of this bill.


          Author's Amendments to Address Committee's Concerns Regarding  
          Immunity Provision.  Unlike state law regarding school  
          responsibilities to comply with the concussion protocol, this  
          bill, as currently in print, includes an immunity provision  
          providing that a "coach shall not be exposed to civil liability  
          for his or her action or inaction" in compliance with the bill,  
          "unless the coach is found to have acted in a grossly negligent  
          manner."  For a number of reasons, this immunity provision is  
          unnecessary and unreasonable.  First, it is inconsistent with  
          other state laws that provide immunity to school personnel whose  
          job descriptions do not require them to engage in emergency  
          medical assistance, but who volunteer to be trained to  
          administer such assistance in some circumstances.  The same  
          rationale does not apply to the provisions of this bill, which  
          require coaches (as well as athletic directors and athletic  
          trainers) to intervene when a student-athlete shows symptoms of  
          SCA.  Second, such immunity is unnecessary and superfluous, at  
          least for coaches, athletic directors, and athletic trainers who  
          are public employees, because those employees are already immune  
          for discretionary decisions (such as whether or not to remove an  
          athlete from competition).  Third, schools and school personnel  
          have complete immunity for activities held off campus. For all  
          of the above reasons, the author has reasonably agreed to remove  
          the immunity provision in 33487 (b) from the bill.


          Medical Professionals Authorized to Clear Athlete for Return to  
          Play.  Like Section 49475 (regarding athletes who are suspected  
          of sustaining a concussion or head injury in an athletic  
          activity) on which this bill appears to be modeled, this bill  
          uses the term "licensed health care provider" in describing the  
          medical professional who is required to examine the pupil before  
          he or she can be allowed to return to the athletic activity.   
          However, unlike Section 49475, this bill does not define that  
          term.  In order to clarify who is required to perform the  
          medical evaluation, the author proposes the following amendment:








                                                                    AB 1639


                                                                    Page  14







          On Page 4, at line 9: delete "appropriate medical professional"  
          and insert the following:


               a physician and surgeon, or a nurse practitioner or  
               physician assistant practicing in accordance with  
               standardized procedures or protocols developed and approved  
               by the supervising physician and surgeon and the nurse  
               practitioner or physician assistant.


          ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT:  Supporters consider this bill a first  
          effort in preventing future deaths through information and risk  
          assessment.  One supporter, Heartfelt Cardiac Projects, states: 


               This bill is an inaugural step in educating youth, parents  
               and coaches about the potential warning signs and risk  
               factors of sudden cardiac arrest and about the cardiac  
               chain of survival that could save a life.


          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:




          Support


          Eric Paredes Save a Life Foundation (sponsor)
          American Academy of Pediatrics, California


          American Heart Association/American Stroke Association










                                                                    AB 1639


                                                                    Page  15





          Association of California School Administrators


          California School Nurses Organization


          California State PTA


          Children's Cardiology of the Bay Area, inc.


          Children's Cardiomyopathy Foundation


          Consumer Attorneys of California


          Heartfelt Cardiac Projects


          Los Angeles Unified School District


          Mike Whitmarsh Memorial Foundation


          No More Broken Hearts


          Olivia's Heart Project


          San Diego City Councilmember Chris Cate


          San Diego City Councilmember Mark Kersey










                                                                    AB 1639


                                                                    Page  16





          San Diego County Supervisor Ron Roberts


          Saving Hearts Foundation


          SDSU Circle K


          Sequoia Union High School District


          Sudden Cardiac Arrest Association


          Travis R. Roy Sudden Cardiac Arrest Fund


          VIA Heart Project


          Numerous individuals




          Opposition


          None on file


          Concerns - request for amendment


          California Academy of Physician Assistants











                                                                    AB 1639


                                                                    Page  17






          Analysis Prepared by:Alison Merrilees / JUD. / (916) 319-2334