BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 1648


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  April 13, 2016


           ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON ACCOUNTABILITY AND ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW


                               Cristina Garcia, Chair


          AB 1648  
          (Wilk) - As Amended March 15, 2016


          SUBJECT:  State publications:  distribution


          SUMMARY:  This bill expands the definition of "state  
          publication" to include publications that are issued by the  
          state on the internet and allows a member of the public to copy,  
          share, distribute, or republish as specified.


          EXISTING LAW declares it is the policy of the State of  
          California to make available to inhabitants of the state free  
          copies of state publications through public libraries and that  
          these libraries shall maintain printed copies and assist public  
          library patrons in their use (Government Code 14900).


          FISCAL EFFECT:  Unknown


          COMMENTS:  Current law governing the distribution of state  
          publications to libraries was first placed in statute in 1945  
          and was last modified in 1965.  The distribution of  
          "information" from the State has changed dramatically over the  
          last fifty years.  However, the distribution of "state  
          publications" has remained focused on printed material.









                                                                    AB 1648


                                                                    Page  2






          This bill seeks to include publications that are issued by the  
          state on the internet within the definition of "state  
          publication."  The bill would also allow any member of the  
          public to copy or republish this material.  The author states  
          that, "any practice that at all limits the public's access to  
          public documents should not be tolerated."  The author cites the  
          current contract involving the California Code of Regulations  
          (CCR). The Office of Administrative Law (OAL) is tasked with  
          maintaining the CCR and making it available to the public on the  
          internet.  The OAL does this through a contract with a qualified  
          vendor.


          Currently, OAL has no information technology staff and contracts  
          with the vendor to provide the statutorily required public  
          access.  Compensation for the service provided by the vendor  
          comes from allowing the vendor to charge individuals, businesses  
          and others for additional services, such as enhanced search  
          functions and notifications of changes or additions to  
          regulations, based on the copyright of the CCR held by the State  
          of California.  According to OAL, the State receives  
          approximately $570,000 annually from this contract.


          If the State wishes to allow any member of the public to copy or  
          republish the free online version of the CCR, as would be  
          permitted under this bill, the State would have to forgo any  
          benefits accrued from contracting this service to an outside  
          vendor. 


          While this bill will presumably increase public access to state  
          publications provided on the internet, it will do so at a cost  
          to the state.


          PREVIOUS LEGISLATION:  AB 1612 (Donnelly) of 2014 was similar to  
          this bill but substantially amended in the Assembly  








                                                                    AB 1648


                                                                    Page  3





          Appropriations Committee.  The subsequent bill would have  
          prohibited the OAL from charging users with disabilities a fee  
          for access to the free online CCR.  The bill was vetoed by the  
          Governor, who stated it was unnecessary because any problems  
          with accessibility can be quickly corrected by the OAL.


          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:




          Support


          None on file




          Opposition


          None on file




          Analysis Prepared by:William Herms / A. & A.R. / (916) 319-3600


















                                                                    AB 1648


                                                                    Page  4