BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNANCE AND FINANCE Senator Robert M. Hertzberg, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular ------------------------------------------------------------------ |Bill No: |AB 1665 |Hearing |6/22/16 | | | |Date: | | |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------| |Author: |Bonilla |Tax Levy: |No | |----------+---------------------------------+-----------+---------| |Version: |5/9/16 |Fiscal: |No | ------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant|Bouaziz | |: | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Transactions and use taxes: County of Alameda, County of Contra Costa, and Contra Costa Transportation Authority Shifts Contra Costa County's existing authority to impose transactions and use taxes to the Contra Costa Transportation Authority. Background State law imposes a sales and use tax (SUT) on the sale, storage, or use of tangible personal property unless exempted by state law. Cities and Counties may increase the SUT rate up to 2% as a transactions and use tax for either specific or general purposes with voter approval as required by the California Constitution. The current state SUT is 7.5%, but beginning January 1, 2017, the state SUT rate on tangible personal property will be 7.25% and imposed as follows: ------------------------------------------------------------- | | | | | Rate | Jurisdiction | Purpose/Authority | | | | | |-------+--------------------+--------------------------------| | | | | |3.9375%|State (General |State general purposes | AB 1665 (Bonilla) 5/9/16 Page 2 of ? | |Fund) | | | | | | |-------+--------------------+--------------------------------| | |Local Revenue Fund | | |1.0625%|2011 |Realignment of local public | | | |safety services | | | | | |-------+--------------------+--------------------------------| | | | | | 0.50% |State (Local |Local governments to fund | | |Revenue Fund) |health and welfare programs | | | | | |-------+--------------------+--------------------------------| | | | | | 0.50% |State (Local Public |Local governments to fund | | |Safety Fund) |public safety services | | | | | |-------+--------------------+--------------------------------| | | | | | 1.25% |Local (City/County) | | | | | | | | | | | |1.00% City and |City and county general | | |County |operations. | | | | | | |0.25% County | | | | |Dedicated to county | | | |transportation purposes | | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------- Transactions & Use Tax Existing law allows cities and counties to impose additional sales and use taxes, called transactions and use taxes (TUT), up to a combined 2% rate, with voter approval. The tax must be imposed in increments of 0.125%. In rare cases, the Legislature allows local agencies to exceed the 2% cap. Current law authorizes Alameda County and Contra Costa County to impose a district tax for countywide transportation programs at a capped rate of 0.5%, which in combination with other district taxes, would exceed the 2% limitation established in existing AB 1665 (Bonilla) 5/9/16 Page 3 of ? law if: Alameda County and Contra Costa County adopt an ordinance proposing the district tax by any applicable voting requirements. The proposed ordinance is submitted to the electorate and is approved by two-thirds of the voters voting on the ordinance. The district tax conforms to the Transactions and Use Tax Law. Proposed Law Assembly Bill 1665 removes the existing authority granted to Alameda County and Contra Costa County, and instead authorizes the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) to adopt an ordinance to impose a TUT, subject to voter approval, that exceeds the combined statutory rate of 2% until December 31, 2020. AB 1665 provides any ordinance previously adopted under the authority in existing law for Alameda and Contra Costa Counties to adopt an additional TUT may continue in effect. The bill contains an urgency clause and states that it is necessary for this bill take effect immediately in order to ensure the residents of Contra Costa County have adequate transportation services. AB 1665 finds and declares that a special law is necessary because of the unique fiscal pressures experienced in Alameda County and by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority in providing essential transportation programs. State Revenue Impact Unknown. Comments 1. Purpose of the bill. According to the author, "In light of the severe state funding shortfall for transportation, it is AB 1665 (Bonilla) 5/9/16 Page 4 of ? imperative that local governments, agencies and their constituents have the ability to generate additional funding to plan and bring forth critical transportation projects. AB 1665 will streamline this process, making local governments more efficient so voters can weigh-in on the transportation issues of the county. Simply put, this bill will allow CCTA to continue the great work they have been known to accomplish, while meeting the precise needs of Contra Costa County and its residents." 2. Transactions and Use Tax Law. Cities and counties are authorized to impose additional TUT to the state's SUT rate, subject to voter approval as required by the California Constitution. General purpose taxes require majority voter approval and special purpose taxes restricted for a specified use require two-thirds voter approval. According to the State Board of Equalization (BOE), as of January 1, 2016, 4 of 48 county-imposed taxes are general purpose taxes and 44 are special purpose taxes with 30 dedicated for transportation purposes. Generally, TUT may be imposed in 0.125% increments, up to a total of 2% within the county. However, the Legislature has granted several exemptions to the 2% cap, subject to voter approval, as local jurisdictions where both the county and cities within the county impose TUT may otherwise easily exceed the cap. These jurisdictions include the City of El Cerrito, County of Alameda, County of Contra Costa, County of San Mateo, Transportation Agency for Monterey County, and the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA). 3. Existing cap. SB 566, (Scott, 2003) imposed the uniform 2% cap for both cities and counties, in response to at least five bills a year seeking to impose the tax. The cap set an upper limit on the local rate, as California's sales and use tax rate is very high. Last year, AB 464 (Mullin and Gordon) attempted to raise the cap to 3%, however, Governor Brown vetoed the bill, stating: "This bill would raise, on a blanket basis, the limit on local transactions and use tax for all counties and cities from two percent to three percent. Although I have approved raising the limit for individual counties, I am reluctant to approve this measure in view of all the taxes being discussed and proposed for the 2016 ballot." AB 1665 (Bonilla) 5/9/16 Page 5 of ? 4. High rate. Eight cities in California already impose the highest sales and use tax rate in the state. An additional 0.5% will expand the number of cities with a double digit sales and use tax rate. Unfortunately, this will disproportionately impact low income individuals and families that generally pay a higher percentage of their income in sales and use tax. 5. Alameda County. On November 4, 2014, 70.76% of Alameda County voters approved an additional 0.50% TUT via Measure BB to fund transportation improvements for 30 years, the first tax in the county levied in excess of the 2% cap. As such, Alameda County is currently at its 2.5% countywide cap. 6. Contra Costa County. This bill shifts the authorization to impose TUT from Contra Costa County to CCTA, similar to authorization granted to transportation authorities on behalf of other counties. The CCTA was formed by voters in 1988 to lead Contra Costa County's transportation efforts and manage funds generated by Measure C, a 0.50% TUT approved by voters that same year for transportation purposes. The CCTA also manages funds generated by Measure J, approved by Contra Costa County voters in November 2004, to extend the TUT for another 30 years. Presently, CCTA is moving forward with proposing a transportation tax measure to county voters, but cannot do so directly under current law. Instead, Contra Costa County must first adopt an ordinance to present a tax to voters and then work with the State Board of Equalization to delegate administrative responsibilities from the county to CCTA. This bill transfers the authority to seek TUT voter approval to CCTA if approved by two-thirds of voters. Since plans to ask Contra Costa County voters for a new tax are already under way, the author has included an urgency measure in the bill to ensure state law is enacted in time to allow CCTA to propose the TUT measure to its voters. 7. Prior Legislation. AB 210 (Wieckowski, 2013), extended the authority of Alameda County and authorized Contra Costa County, until December 31, 2020, to impose TUT in excess of the 2% countywide cap if approved by voters. 8. Incoming! The Senate Transportation and Housing Committee approved AB 1655 by a vote of 11-0 on June 14, 2016. AB 1665 (Bonilla) 5/9/16 Page 6 of ? 9. Special legislation. The California Constitution prohibits special legislation when a general law can apply (Article IV, §16). AB 1665 contains findings and declarations explaining the need for legislation that applies only to the County of Alameda and the Contra Costa Transportation Authority. Assembly Actions Assembly Local Government 6-3 Assembly Revenue and Taxation6-0 Assembly Floor 77-0 Support and Opposition (6/15/16) Support : Bay Area Council; Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors; Contra Costa Transportation Authority; California-Nevada Conference of Operating Engineers; San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District. Opposition : Unknown. -- END --