BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 1697


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  May 11, 2016


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                               Lorena Gonzalez, Chair


          AB  
          1697 (Bonilla) - As Amended April 25, 2016


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Rules                          |Vote:|8 - 0        |
          |Committee:   |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |Jobs, Economic Development,    |     |9 - 0        |
          |             |and the Economy                |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  NoReimbursable:  No


          SUMMARY:


          This bill expands the criteria for selecting projects funded by  
          the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology  
          Program (Program) to prioritize the ability of the project to  
          provide career pathways and promote the employment of trained  
          workers in the clean vehicle technology and renewable fuels  
          industries.









                                                                    AB 1697


                                                                    Page  2






          FISCAL EFFECT:


          1)Increased one-time costs of $500,000 for the California Energy  
            Commission (CEC) to obtain the technical support necessary to  
            revise criteria and implement the requirements of the bill.   
            (Alternative Renewable Rule and Vehicle Technology Fund).


          2)Initial and ongoing annual costs of $450,000 and 3 positions  
            to implement the revised Program.  (Alternative Renewable Rule  
            and Vehicle Technology Fund).


          COMMENTS:


          1)Purpose.  According to the author, as policies to reduce GHG  
            emissions and petroleum use go into effect, the job market  
            landscape will inevitably change, resulting in a greater  
            emphasis on green jobs. In order to remain competitive,  
            California will have to transition its workforce to match the  
            growing demand.   By incentivizing applicants to include a  
            workforce development element in order to be more competitive,  
            this bill will ensure the California workforce is able to  
            transition smoothly to future policies aimed at reducing GHG  
            emissions.
          2)Background.  In 2007, AB 118 established three new programs  
            intended to promote vehicle and fuel technology that reduces  
            air pollution and GHG emissions statewide.  These programs are  
            the Air Quality Improvement Program (AQIP), the Enhanced Fleet  
            Modernization Program (EFMP), and the Alternative Renewable  
            Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program (Program).

            The Program is administered by the CEC, which each year awards  
            up to $100 million in grants to support the development and  
            deployment of innovative technologies related to alternative  
            fuel and vehicle technologies.  Although workforce development  








                                                                    AB 1697


                                                                    Page  3





            is among the list of eligible activities, funding for training  
            has been limited.  Of the $100 million available each year,  
            the CEC set aside $2.5 million in 2014-15 and $3 million in  
            2015-16 for workforce related investments.

          3)Implementation Concerns.  The CEC does not have the  
            specialized expertise needed to ensure effective workforce  
            training and employment programs are contained in each award.  
            Most agreements fund the development, demonstration and  
            deployment of alternative fuels, alternative fuel vehicles,  
            and infrastructure. These funding recipients have expertise in  
            installing electric vehicle charging infrastructure,  
            constructing hydrogen refueling stations,  
            constructing/operating biofuel production facilities, and  
            demonstrating/deploying alternative fuel vehicles. 
            Workforce training is currently an eligible Program  
            expenditure.  To date, the Program has provided workforce  
            training funds to the Employment Training Panel, California  
            Community Colleges, California Workforce Investment Board, and  
            Employment Development Department. 


            This bill goes beyond eligibility and instead adds workforce  
            training to the criteria for which the CEC is required to  
            prioritize all individual projects and funding categories.   
            The author may wish to consider identifying another state  
            agency to assist CEC in implementing the additional workforce  
            training criteria across all funding categories.





          Analysis Prepared by:Jennifer Galehouse / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081












                                                                    AB 1697


                                                                    Page  4