BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       AB 1703|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                      CONSENT 


          Bill No:  AB 1703
          Author:   Santiago (D) 
          Introduced:1/25/16  
          Vote:     21 

           SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE:  7-0, 6/14/16
           AYES:  Hancock, Anderson, Glazer, Leno, Liu, Monning, Stone

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  77-0, 4/7/16 (Consent) - See last page for  
            vote

           SUBJECT:   Inmates:  medical treatment


          SOURCE:    Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department


          DIGEST:  This bill expands the definition of "immediate medical  
          or hospital care" to include critical specialty medical  
          procedures or treatment, such as dialysis, which cannot be  
          performed at a city or county jail.


          ANALYSIS:  


          Existing law:

          1)Specifies that the court may order the removal of an inmate  
            from a city or county jail to the county hospital or if there  
            is no county hospital in such county, to any hospital  
            designated by such court when the judge finds that a prisoner  
            in any city or county jail requires medical treatment  
            necessitating hospitalization that cannot be provided at the  
            jail. And, existing law requires the sheriff or other official  








                                                                    AB 1703  
                                                                    Page  2



            in charge of county correctional facilities to maintain the  
            necessary guards, who may be private security guards, for the  
            safekeeping of a prisoner at an outside medical facility.   
            (Penal Code § 4011(a).)

          2)Specifies that the cost of outside medical services will be  
            charged against the county or the city responsible for the  
            jail, and the city or county may recover the costs from the  
            person receiving medical services, or any person or agency  
            responsible for his care and maintenance. (Penal Code §  
            4011(b).)

          3)Provides that when a prisoner is indigent, the cost of outside  
            medical services will be paid out of the general fund of the  
            city or county.  And, under existing law, in the case of city  
            jail prisoners removed to the county hospital, the cost of  
            such hospital care will be paid by the city to the county, at  
            a rate per day fixed by the board of supervisors of the county  
            to approximate the average actual cost to the county of such  
            hospital care. (Penal Code § 4011(c).) 

          4)Provides that a prisoner who is financially able to pay for  
            his medical care, the medical superintendent of such hospital  
            other than a county hospital may, with the approval of a  
            judge, enter into a special agreement with such person, or  
            with his relatives or friends, for his medical expenses.   
            Current law, additionally, states that any prisoner may  
            decline care or treatment and provide other care and treatment  
            for himself at his own expense. (Penal Code § 4011(d).)

          5)Provides that whenever it appears to a sheriff or jailer that  
            a prisoner in a jail under his or her charge is in need of  
            "immediate medical or hospital care," and that the health and  
            welfare of the prisoner will be injuriously affected unless  
            the prisoner is taken to a hospital, the sheriff or jailer may  
            authorize the immediate removal of the prisoner under guard to  
            a hospital, without first obtaining a court order as  
            specified. (Penal Code § 4011.5.)



          6)Requires the sheriff or jailer to apply to a judge for an  








                                                                    AB 1703  
                                                                    Page  3



            order authorizing the continued absence of the prisoner from  
            the jail when the condition of the prisoner prevents his  
            return to the jail within 48-hours from the time of his  
            removal for medical treatment.  (Penal Code § 4011.5.)

          This bill expands the definition of "immediate medical or  
          hospital care" to include critical specialty medical procedures  
          or treatment, such as dialysis, which cannot be furnished,  
          performed, or supplied at a city or county jail.
          
          Background

          According to the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC),  
          the number of offenders in county jail, as well as the length of  
          their sentences, has increased.  Specifically, PPIC states:

          Our data indicates that realignment has significantly affected  
          county jail populations. Between June 2011 and June 2012, during  
          which time California's prison population declined by roughly  
          26,600, the average daily population of California's jails grew  
          by about 8,600 inmates, or about 12 percent.  (Impact of  
          Realignment on County Jail Populations, PPIC, Magnus Lofstrom  
          and Louis Raphael, 2013, p. 2.)

          PPIC's further notes the impact that realignment has had on the  
          number of inmates now serving extended sentences in county  
          jails:  

          Before realignment, the maximum stay in county jail was one  
          year. Now that lower-level felons go to county jail, this  
          practice has changed-there is no limit on the amount of time  
          these offenders can serve.  As of early 2014, county jails  
          housed 1,761 inmates serving sentences of more than five  
          years-up 606 from 2013. (http://www.ppic.org/main/  
          publication_show.asp?i=1061)


          According to the author, this has led to an increase in  
          long-term medical issues faced by inmates, as well as an  
          increase in the processes and procedures sheriffs and jailers  
          must undergo to address them.  To this end, this legislation  
          would, according to the American Civil Liberties Union of  








                                                                    AB 1703  
                                                                    Page  4



          California, who is in support of this legislation, "ease  
          workloads for courts that currently issue separate removal  
          orders for each individual transported from a jail to a  
          necessary medical service, and will simplify the medical  
          transportation process for jail personnel."   


          FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:    No          Fiscal  
          Com.:NoLocal:    No


          SUPPORT:   (Verified6/15/16)


          Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (source)
          American Civil Liberties Union
          California Peace Officers' Association
          California Public Defenders Association
          California State Association of Counties
          California State Sheriffs' Association
          Legal Services with Prisoners with Children
          Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office
          Orange County Board of Supervisors
          Urban Counties of California


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified6/15/16)


          None received

          ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  77-0, 4/7/16
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Atkins, Baker, Bigelow,  
            Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Chang,  
            Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle,  
            Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina  
            Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez,  
            Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden,  
            Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Linder, Lopez, Low,  
            Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin,  
            Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Quirk,  
            Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark  








                                                                    AB 1703 
                                                                    Page  5



            Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams,  
            Wood, Rendon
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Campos, Levine


          Prepared by:Jessica  Devencenzi / PUB. S. / 
          6/15/16 17:24:50


                                   ****  END  ****