BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 1755


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  April 19, 2016


                  ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON WATER, PARKS, AND WILDLIFE


                                 Marc Levine, Chair


          AB 1755  
          (Dodd) - As Amended April 5, 2016


          SUBJECT:  The Open and Transparent Water Data Act


          SUMMARY:  Requires the Department of Water Resources (DWR) to  
          establish a public benefit corporation to manage statewide water  
          information and an online water transfer clearinghouse.   
          Specifically, this bill:  


             1)   Makes findings and declarations on the need for a 21st  
               century water management system.


             2)   Requires DWR to establish a public benefit corporation  
               to manage a statewide water information system.


             3)   Requires the water information system to integrate water  
               data from numerous federal, state, and local agencies in a  
               manner that allows for all data to be readily incorporated  
               and compiled into readily usable formats.


             4)   Requires the  public benefit corporation to establish an  
               online water transfer clearing house.









                                                                    AB 1755


                                                                    Page  2






             5)   Requires DWR, the State Water Resources Control Board  
               (State Water Board), and the Department of Fish and  
               Wildlife (DFW) to develop a transparent process for sharing  
               water data.


             6)   Creates a Water Information System Administration Fund  
               with moneys available to the Department upon appropriation.


          EXISTING LAW:  


             1)   Provides DWR responsibilities and jurisdiction in  
               matters pertaining to water or dams held by the state.



             2)   Provides for the establishment of a water rights system  
               with measuring and reporting requirements administered by  
               the State Water Board.




             3)   Requires DFW to hold fish and wildlife in trust for the  
               people of the state.   



             4)   Establishes a policy to facilitate the voluntary  
               transfer of water, and permits all water rights holders to  
               pursue a water transfer.



          FISCAL EFFECT:  Unknown.









                                                                    AB 1755


                                                                    Page  3






          COMMENTS:  Requires DWR to establish a public benefit  
          corporation to manage statewide water information and an online  
          water transfer clearinghouse.


             1)   Author's Statement: AB 1755 Improves open and  
               transparent access to water data by creating a statewide  
               water data information system to integrate critical water  
               data in a user friendly, publicly accessible website that  
               will simplify and expedite decision-making.  Develops  
               protocols for data sharing, transparency, documentation,  
               and quality control that will promote greater  
               compatibility among data sets and encourage the  
               application of new methods to synthesize information to  
               support better decision making.  Creates an online water  
               transfer information clearinghouse to improve access to  
               information, an important step towards an effective water  
               market.  Establishes a new public benefit corporation to  
               house and manage the water data system and clearinghouse.

             2)   Background: 


              More information is better than less


               Most activities in today's world are documented closely and  
               compiled into data sets.  Information has value in the 21st  
               century economy.  That value is, of course, tied to the  
               usefulness of the information.  Public policy and economic  
               decision making have historically benefited from more  
               information.


               From a public policy standpoint, data has been a big driver  
               in dramatic improvement in energy use in California and  
               nationally.  The Energy Information Administration was  
               created after the 1970's energy crisis when it became clear  








                                                                    AB 1755


                                                                    Page  4





               that the information necessary to make good energy policy  
               was not available.  Today we have precise information about  
               energy use, and it has allowed for the development of  
               policies that have improved energy management. 


               In contrast to the information economy and the improved  
               decision making that has occurred from the widespread  
               availability of useable data, there is very little easily  
               available data on water.  On the national level there is  
               analysis on water use only once every five years; that data  
               is for one year, and comes out four years after reporting  
               is complete.  


               California keeps numerous data sets on water from urban use  
               to environmental use and everything in between.  Those data  
               sets are not coordinated and as a result do not produce a  
               complete water information picture.  The value of these  
               numerous data sets is diminished by the fact that they are  
               piecemeal and while they may address overlapping problems  
               of supply, use, and efficiency they are only valuable to  
               the extent they touch on any specific area.


               This bill requires the state overcome the challenge of  
               piecemeal water data in the state.  Having all water data  
               in the state compiled and publicly available in a useable  
               fashion would drive water policy innovation and likely  
               produce many of the benefits that robust useable data have  
               had on energy policy.   


               Role of Transfers


               Water transfers involve a change in the place of water use,  
               from the water's historic point of diversion and use, to a  
               new location either within or outside the watershed of  








                                                                    AB 1755


                                                                    Page  5





               origin.  Water transfers can last up to a year (temporary),  
               more than a year but not permanent (long-term), or be  
               permanent.  Water transfers are strictly voluntary, and  
               must not create harm to other legal water users, the  
               environment, or the local economy from which the water is  
               being transferred.


               Water transfers can be an effective water management tool.   
               Transfers are particularly useful for meeting critical  
               needs during drought periods.  Transfers can only occur  
               with "new water" the surface water system will realize as a  
               result of changes in reservoir operation, groundwater  
               substitution, crop idling or shifting, and occasionally  
               water conservation action taken.


               History of Transfers


               Water transfers in California date back to the Gold Rush.   
               An 1859 California Supreme Court decision found that water  
               rights can be transferred like any other property. In 1976  
               the Governor's Commission on Water Rights recognized the  
               importance of water transfers to the future of California's  
               water supply.  Many of the recommendations of the  
               commission were adopted in the 1980's.  There was  
               additional legislation in the early 1990's but little has  
               changed in the last 20 years.  


               Transfers grew considerably during the 1987-92 drought and  
               continued to expand through the 1990's.  Growth in  
               transfers slowed dramatically in 2000 and has remained  
               relatively flat or even regressed since 2010.  


               Big Year for Transfer Reform?









                                                                    AB 1755


                                                                    Page  6






               The current historic drought has highlighted major barriers  
               to water transfers.  This has brought attention to the  
               complicated rules associated with trading water from  
               different sources.  California's trading rules are  
               fragmented, opaque, inconsistent, and cumbersome.  Often  
               times several departments and agencies across and between  
               federal, state, and local government have a role in a  
               transfer moving forward.  As a result a number of  
               stakeholders including agricultural, water purveyors,  
               environmental, and local communities have begun to come  
               together to discuss ways in which trading rules can work  
               better.  


               In March, the Association of California Water Agencies  
               released principles recommending ways to improve the water  
               transfer process.  The release of the principles has ramped  
               up the stakeholder process.  There appears to be general  
               agreement among many on the need for improvement in the  
               governance and management of data associated with water  
               transfers.  There is, however, quite a number of issues  
               still to be resolved.  It seems likely that the next couple  
               of months will produce more refined proposals. 


               Legislation on this issue should consider all aspects of  
               improving water transfers.  The path to do that is  
               dependent on the discussions and outcomes of the  
               stakeholder processes that are currently underway.  The  
               final version of this bill will no doubt be shaped by those  
               stakeholder efforts.  


               This bill and AB 2304 (Levine) of 2016, address the issue  
               of water transfers in different ways.  It has been the  
               policy of this committee to resolve in committee different  
               approaches to the same policy issue.  There is an  
               expectation that significant progress will occur through  








                                                                    AB 1755


                                                                    Page  7





               the stakeholder process in the near term.  The overlap this  
               bill has with AB 2304, specifically the reporting on water  
               transactions in Chapter 2, Article 3, should be removed.


             3)   Prior and Related Legislation: 


                  a)        AB 2304 (Levine) 2016, establishes the  
                    California Water Market Exchange to create a  
                    centralized water market platform.  AB 2304 passed  
                    this committee 10-4.


                  b)        SB 88 (Budget) Chapter 27, Statutes of 2015,  
                    added measurement and reporting requirements for a  
                    substantial number of water right holders.


                  c)        The following pieces of legislation created  
                    the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act:


                        i.             AB 1739 (Dickinson), Chapter 347,  
                         Statutes of 2014
                        ii.            SB 1168 (Pavely), Chapter 346,  
                         Statutes of 2014


                        iii.           SB 1319(Pavely), Chapter 348,  
                         Statutes of 2014





             4)   Supporting Arguments: The current drought has revealed  
               significant challenges to effective water management in  
               California.  A lack of assessable data that would support  








                                                                    AB 1755


                                                                    Page  8





               timely and science-based decision making is a key  
               constraint to creating a sustainable water management  
               system that is able to meet the challenges of prolonged  
               drought as well as heavy rainfall and flooding.  Water  
               agencies across the state submit large quantities of data  
               to an array of local, state, and federal agencies.  The  
               problem is not a lack of data, but the fact that managers  
               and water users have been unable to harness the data due to  
               the lack of an integrated system that would make the  
               information easily accessible and usable.  Establishing a  
               statewide water information system would help managers and  
               users make more informed decisions and ensure that limited  
               water resources are managed with the best and most complete  
               information. 


             5)   Opposing Arguments: None on file


          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:




          Support



          Bay Area Council (Sponsor)

          American Rivers

          Association of California Water Agencies (if amended)

          AquAlliance (if amended)

          CalTrout

          Ceres








                                                                    AB 1755


                                                                    Page  9






          Community Water Center (if amended)

          Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

          North Bay Leadership Council

          Northern California Water Association

          San Francisco Chamber of Commerce

          Sonoma County Water Agency

          The Bay Institute (TBI)

          Tuolumne River Trust

          The Nature Conservancy 

          Union of Concerned Scientists

          Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District


          Opposition


          None on File




          Analysis Prepared by:Ryan Ojakian / W., P., & W. / (916)  
          319-2096













                                                                    AB 1755


                                                                    Page  10