BILL ANALYSIS Ó
AB 1755
Page 1
ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
AB
1755 (Dodd)
As Amended May 11, 2016
Majority vote
------------------------------------------------------------------
|Committee |Votes|Ayes |Noes |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
|----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
|Water |12-1 |Levine, Bigelow, |Gallagher |
| | |Dodd, Eggman, | |
| | |Cristina Garcia, | |
| | |Eduardo Garcia, | |
| | |Gomez, Lopez, Medina, | |
| | |Olsen, Salas, | |
| | |Williams | |
| | | | |
|----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
|Appropriations |19-0 |Gonzalez, Bigelow, | |
| | |Bloom, Bonilla, | |
| | |Bonta, Calderon, | |
| | |Chang, Daly, Eggman, | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | |Eduardo Garcia, | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | |Roger Hernández, | |
| | |Holden, Jones, | |
AB 1755
Page 2
| | |Obernolte, Quirk, | |
| | |Santiago, Wagner, | |
| | |Weber, Wood | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Establishes the Open and Transparent Water Data Act.
Specifically, this bill:
1)Requires the Department of Water Resources (DWR), the State
Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and the Department of
Fish and Wildlife (DFW) to coordinate and integrate existing
water and ecological data to provide adequate information to
implement the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA),
improve water resource management, and bring greater
transparency to the water transfer market.
2)Requires the DWR, SWRCB, and DFW to develop water data
protocols to promote open-source platforms and decision
support tools.
a) Requires recipients of state grant and research funds to
comply with the protocols in order to be eligible for
funding.
b) Requires the three agencies to submit a report to the
Legislature before establishing the platform.
1)Requires DWR to create a data platform to integrate local,
state, and federal data by January 2018. Allows DWR to
contract with an existing nonprofit or create a nonprofit to
manage the platform. Specifies minimum requirements and data
AB 1755
Page 3
sets to be included in the integrated data platform.
2)Creates the Data Administration Fund and makes funds
available, upon appropriation to DWR, SWRCB, and DFW. Allows
the three agencies to receive public or private funds, as
specified to be deposited in the Fund.
EXISTING LAW:
1)Provides the DWR with responsibilities over data associated
with the State Water Project, groundwater monitoring, urban
water management, and land use.
2)Provides the SWRCB with responsibilities over data associated
with water rights, water diversions, and water quality.
3)Provides the DFW with responsibilities over data associated
with fish populations and locations.
FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations
Committee, this bill would have:
1)Ongoing annual implementation and administrative costs of $1.6
million including an ongoing annual professional services
costs of between $600,000 and $750,000 associated with
creating and maintaining the platform.
AB 1755
Page 4
2)Increased DFW annual costs of $930,000 for eight permanent
intermittent staff to coordinate with DWR and SWRCB, collect
and coordinate data, develop standards and policies, and build
and manage data systems.
Increased ongoing annual costs of $840,000 for SWRCB to
coordinate with DWR and DFW to develop protocols for data
sharing, report to the Legislature, and organize, mine, and
analyze data. Increased contracting costs of $450,000
one-time and $200,000 ongoing for professional services.
This bill creates a fund and identifies potential funding
sources, but does not include any actual funding. It is also
possible that since this bill does not clearly delegate
responsibilities among the three agencies, the cost may be less
due to duplicative estimates.
COMMENTS: California keeps numerous data sets on water from
urban use to environmental use and everything in between. Those
data sets are not coordinated and as a result do not produce a
complete water information picture. The value of these numerous
data sets is diminished by the fact that they are piecemeal and
while they may address overlapping problems of supply, use, and
efficiency, they are only valuable to the extent they touch on
any specific area.
Having all water data in the state compiled and publicly
available in a useable fashion could drive water policy
innovation and produce many of the benefits that robust useable
data have had on energy policy.
Analysis Prepared by:
AB 1755
Page 5
Ryan Ojakian / W., P., & W. / (916) 319-2096
FN: 0003209