BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 1761


                                                                    Page  1


          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS


          AB  
          1761 (Weber)


          As Amended  August 19, 2016


          Majority vote


           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |69-3  |(May 19, 2016) |SENATE: |36-1  |(August 23,      |
          |           |      |               |        |      |2016)            |
          |           |      |               |        |      |                 |
          |           |      |               |        |      |                 |
           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Original Committee Reference:  PUB. S.


          SUMMARY:  Creates a human trafficking affirmative defense  
          applicable to non-violent, non-serious, non-trafficking crimes.   



          The Senate amendments provide that records sealed after  
          prevailing on the human trafficking affirmative defense may  
          still be accessed by law enforcement for subsequent  
          investigatory purposes involving persons other than the  
          defendant.


          AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY, this bill:  


          1)Stated that, in addition to any other affirmative defense, it  
            is a defense to a crime that the person was coerced to commit  
            the offense as a direct result of being a human trafficking  








                                                                    AB 1761


                                                                    Page  2


            victim at the time of the offense and of reasonable fear of  
            harm.
          2)Stated that this affirmative defense does not apply to a  
            serious felony, a violent felony, or the offense of human  
            trafficking, as specified.


          3)Established the standard of proof for the human trafficking  
            affirmative defense as the preponderance of evidence standard.


          4)Stated that certifying records from federal, state, tribal, or  
            local court or government certifying agencies for documents  
            such as U or T visas, may be presented to establish the  
            affirmative defense.


          5)Provided that the human trafficking affirmative defense can be  
            asserted at any time before entry of plea or before the end of  
            a trial.  The defense can also be determined at the  
            preliminary hearing.


          6)Entitled a person who successfully raises the human  
            trafficking affirmative defense to the following relief:


             a)   Sealing of all court records in the case;
             b)   Release from all penalties and disabilities resulting  
               from the charge, and all actions that led to the charge  
               shall be deemed not to have occurred; and


             c)   Permission to attest in all circumstances that he or she  
               has never been arrested for, or charged with the subject  
               crime, including in financial aid, housing, employment, and  
               loan applications.


          7)Stated that, in any juvenile delinquency proceeding, if the  
            court finds that the alleged offense was committed as a direct  
            result of being a victim of human trafficking then it shall  








                                                                    AB 1761


                                                                    Page  3


            dismiss the case and automatically seal the case records.
          8)Stated that the person may not be thereafter charged with  
            perjury or otherwise giving a false statement based on the  
            above relief.


          9)Stated that in a juvenile delinquency proceeding, if the court  
            finds that the offense charged in the proceedings was  
            committed as a direct result of the minor being a victim of  
            human trafficking, and the affirmative defense was established  
            by a preponderance of the evidence, then the court shall  
            dismiss the proceedings and order automatic record sealing.


          10)Provided that in a criminal action expert testimony is  
            admissible by either the prosecution or defense regarding the  
            effects of human trafficking on its victims, including, but  
            not limited to the nature and effect of physical, emotional,  
            or mental abuse on the beliefs, perceptions, or behavior of  
            human trafficking victims.


          11)Stated that the requisite foundation for the introduction of  
            this expert testimony will be established if the proponent of  
            the evidence shows its relevance and the proper qualifications  
            of the expert witness.


          EXISTING LAW:


          1)Guarantees a defendant a meaningful opportunity to present a  
            defense.    
          2)Provides that all persons are capable of committing crimes  
            except those belonging to specified classes, including person  
            who committed the act or made the omission charged under  
            threats or menaces sufficient to show that they had reasonable  
            cause to and did believe their lives would be endangered if  
            they refused.  


          3)States that all relevant evidence is admissible unless it is  








                                                                    AB 1761


                                                                    Page  4


            made inadmissible by some statutory or constitutional  
            provision.  


          4)Provides that the court in its discretion may exclude evidence  
            if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the  
            probability that its admission will necessitate undue  
            consumption of time or create substantial danger of undue  
            prejudice, of confusing the issues, or of misleading the jury.  
             


          5)States that a person is qualified to testify as an expert if  
            he or she has special knowledge, skill, experience, training,  
            or education sufficient for the court to deem the person  
            qualified on a subject about which he or she is asked to  
            express an opinion.  


          6)Limits expert testimony to a subject that is sufficiently  
            beyond common experience that the opinion of that expert would  
            assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or  
            determine a fact in issue.  


          7)Authorizes expert testimony in criminal cases by either the  
            prosecution or defense regarding intimate partner battering  
            and its effects, including the nature and effect of physical,  
            emotional, or mental abuse on the beliefs, perceptions, or  
            behavior of victims of domestic violence, except when offered  
            against a defendant to prove the occurrence of the act or acts  
            of abuse which form the basis of a criminal charge.  


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to Senate Appropriations Committee,  
          pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8, negligible state costs.


          COMMENTS:  According to the author, "Too often our survivors of  
          human trafficking are forced to commit crimes under threat  
          (directly and indirectly) from their traffickers.  The trauma of  
          being a victim of human trafficking is untold.  In addition to  








                                                                    AB 1761


                                                                    Page  5


          sexual, emotional, and physical abuse, human trafficking victims  
          are arrested and convicted for crimes they were forced to take  
          part in by their traffickers.  For too long, we have compounded  
          this trauma by arresting and charging victims of human  
          trafficking for crimes they committed directly related to their  
          time spent as a trafficking victim.  These victims are charged  
          with crimes, while their traffickers are shielded.  This bill  
          seeks to remedy this situation and create avenues for victims to  
          be identified and the traffickers prosecuted."


          Please see the policy committee analysis for a full discussion  
          of this bill.


          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Sandy Uribe / PUB. S. / (916) 319-3744  FN:   
          0004866