BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 1763 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 19, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HEALTH Jim Wood, Chair AB 1763 (Gipson) - As Introduced February 3, 2016 SUBJECT: Health care coverage: colorectal cancer: screening and testing. SUMMARY: Requires health care service plan (health plan) contracts and health insurance policies to cover all colorectal cancer (CRC) screening examinations and laboratory tests assigned either an "A" or "B" grade by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) for individuals at average risk. Requires coverage for high risk individuals to include additional tests as recommended by the treating physician. Prohibits cost sharing for individuals 50 years of age or older. Specifically, this bill: 1)Requires a health plan contract or health insurance policy renewed on or after January 1, 2018, to provide coverage for all CRC screening examinations and laboratory tests assigned either a grade of A or B by USPSTF for individuals at average risk. Requires the coverage to include, at a minimum, all of the following: a) High sensitivity fecal occult blood tests (FOBT); b) Flexible sigmoidoscopy with high sensitivity FOBT; and, AB 1763 Page 2 c) Colonoscopies, including the removal of polyps during a screening procedure. 2)States that if an enrollee or insured is at high risk for CRC, the coverage required by 1) above must include additional CRC screening examinations and laboratory tests as recommended by the treating physician. States that an individual is at high risk for CRC if the individual has any of the following: a) A family medical history of CRC; b) A prior occurrence of cancer or precursor neoplastic polyp; c) A prior occurrence of a chronic digestive disease condition, including, but not limited to, inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease, or ulcerative colitis; or, d) Other predisposing factors. 3)Prohibits a health plan or health insurer from imposing cost sharing on an enrollee who is 50 years of age or older, for either of the following: AB 1763 Page 3 a) The coverage required by this bill; or, b) Colonoscopies, including the removal of polyps during a screening procedure, if the enrollee has a positive result on any fecal test assigned either a grade of A or a grade of B by the USPSTF. 4)Excludes from the requirement in 1) c) above high deductible health plans. EXISTING LAW: 1)Requires health plans to be regulated by the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) and health insurers to be regulated by the California Department of Insurance (CDI). 2)Requires health plans and insurers providing health coverage in the individual and small group markets to cover, at a minimum, essential health benefits (EHBs), including the 10 EHB benefit categories in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), and consistent with California's EHB benchmark plan, the Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Small Group HMO 30 plan (Kaiser benchmark), as specified in state law. 3)Requires issuers of individual and small group coverage to, at a minimum, cover EHBs in the following 10 categories: ambulatory patient services, emergency services, hospitalization, maternity and newborn care, mental health and substance use disorder services, including behavioral health treatment, prescription drugs, rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices, laboratory services, preventive and AB 1763 Page 4 wellness services and chronic disease management, and pediatric services, including oral and vision care. 4)Requires health plans to provide basic health care services, including physician services; hospital inpatient and ambulatory care services; diagnostic laboratory and diagnostic and therapeutic radiologic services; home health services; preventive health services; emergency health care services; and, hospice care. 5)Requires, under the federal ACA, all non-grandfathered group health plans and health insurance coverage offered in the individual or group market to cover without cost sharing all evidenced-based items or services that have in effect a rating of "A" or "B" in the current recommendations of the USPSTF. FISCAL EFFECT: This bill has not yet been heard by a fiscal committee. COMMENTS: 1)PURPOSE OF THIS BILL. According to the author, this bill is needed to remove cost barriers to colonoscopies for adults 50 to 75 years of age, helping to catch cases of CRC sooner and save the lives of many. The author notes that the ACA requires coverage of CRC screening tests by health plans with no cost sharing for persons age 50 to 75 years. This is important because cost had been a barrier to more people AB 1763 Page 5 getting life-saving early detection tests for CRC. There are different types of CRC screenings; among the tests recommended by the USPSTF are stool blood tests such as the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and the colonoscopy. Either test can be performed without copayments or cost sharing. The FIT test is a noninvasive, cost-effective stool blood test that is more acceptable than a colonoscopy to many people. Some individuals, including those from low income communities and communities of color may not have initial access to screening colonoscopy or may prefer a stool blood test because the procedure is simpler, has lower risk of complications, and is less invasive. If a FIT test is positive, follow up colonoscopy is needed to examine the entire colon and remove any polyps found during the procedure. This process is still part of the "screening" and completes the continuum of care in CRC screening. However, some plans impose cost sharing for the follow up colonoscopy and/or the polyp removal. Some patients, because of cost, will forgo the follow up colonoscopy leaving them at higher risk for CRC and death. As with all cancers, the sooner it is detected and treated, the more likely the patient is to survive. 2)BACKGROUND. Colon cancer is cancer of the large intestine (colon), the lower part of the digestive system. Rectal cancer is cancer of the last several inches of the colon. Together, they're often referred to as CRC. Most cases of CRC begin as small, noncancerous (benign) clumps of cells called adenomatous polyps. Over time some of these polyps become CRCs. Polyps may be small and produce few, if any, symptoms. For this reason, doctors recommend regular screening tests to help prevent CRC by identifying and removing polyps before they become CRC. In most cases, it is not clear what causes CRC. Inherited gene mutations that significantly increase the risk of CRC can be passed through families, but these are linked to only a small percentage of CRCs. According to the Mayo Clinic, factors that may increase risk of CRC include: AB 1763 Page 6 a) Older age. The great majority of people diagnosed with CRC are older than 50. CRC can occur in younger people, but it occurs much less frequently; b) African-American. African-Americans have a greater risk of CRC than do people of other races; c) A personal history of CRC or polyps. People who have already had CRC or adenomatous polyps, have a greater risk of CRC in the future; d) Inflammatory intestinal conditions. Chronic inflammatory diseases of the colon, such as ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, can increase your risk of CRC; e) Inherited syndromes that increase CRC risk. Genetic syndromes passed through generations of your family can increase your risk of CRC. These syndromes include familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary nonpolyposis CRC, which is also known as Lynch syndrome; f) Family history of CRC. People are more likely to develop CRC if they have a parent, sibling or child with the disease. If more than one family member has CRC or rectal cancer, the risk is even greater; g) Low-fiber, high-fat diet. CRC and rectal cancer may AB 1763 Page 7 be associated with a diet low in fiber and high in fat and calories. Research in this area has had mixed results. Some studies have also found an increased risk of CRC in people who eat diets high in red meat and processed meat; h) A sedentary lifestyle. People who are inactive are more likely to develop CRC. Getting regular physical activity may reduce the risk of CRC; i) Diabetes. People with diabetes and insulin resistance may have an increased risk of CRC; j) Obesity. People who are obese have an increased risk of CRC and an increased risk of dying of CRC when compared with people considered normal weight; aa) Smoking. People who smoke may have an increased risk of CRC; bb) Alcohol. Heavy use of alcohol may increase your risk of CRC; and, cc) Radiation therapy for cancer. Radiation therapy directed at the abdomen to treat previous cancers may increase the risk of CRC. AB 1763 Page 8 3)California Health Benefits Review Program (CHBRP) analysis. AB 1996 (Thomson), Chapter 795, Statutes of 2002, requests the University of California to assess legislation proposing a mandated benefit or service and prepare a written analysis with relevant data on the medical, economic, and public health impacts of proposed health plan and health insurance benefit mandate legislation. CHBRP was created in response to AB 1996. SB 125 (Hernandez), Chapter 9, Statutes of 2015, adds an impact assessment on EHBs, and legislation that impacts health insurance benefit designs, cost sharing, premiums, and other health insurance topics. Highlights of the CHBRP analysis on this bill as follows: a) Enrollees covered. CHBRP estimates that as of 2016, 25.2 million Californians have state-regulated coverage that would be subject to this bill. If enacted, CHBRP estimates the percentage of enrollees with coverage for CRC screening exams and lab tests assigned a grade of A or B by the USPSTF and additional screening and tests recommended by a physician would remain to be 100%. However, this bill would eliminate cost sharing on CRC screenings and lab tests for enrollees aged 50 and older including colonoscopies with the removal of polyps if the enrollee has a positive result on any fecal test. Since this bill does not apply to high-deductible plans, CHBRP estimates that 5% of enrollees aged 50 and older would be exempted from waving cost sharing. Accordingly, CHBRP estimates that the percent of enrollees aged 50 and older with coverage for CRC screening services listed in this bill without cost sharing would increase from 78% to 95%. b) Impact on expenditures. CHBRP estimates this bill would increase total net annual expenditures by $5.63 million or 0.004% for enrollees with DMHC regulated plans and CDI-regulated policies. This is due to a 25.92 million increase in total health insurance premiums paid AB 1763 Page 9 by employers and enrollees for newly covered benefits, partially offset by a decrease in enrollee expenditures for previously noncovered benefits ($20.29 million). On a per member per month basis, CHBRP estimates that premiums on various plans and policies would increase by $0.003 to $0.21. c) EHBs. This bill impacts the terms and conditions of coverage for CRC screenings and tests, but does not change coverage itself. This bill does not exceed EHBs. d) Medical effectiveness. There is a preponderance of evidence that USPSTF-recommended CRC screening modalities are medically effective for the detection and prevention of CRC among average and high-risk individuals. e) Utilization. CHBRP assumes that the overall utilization of CRC screening and lab tests is going to increase by 0.3% (1,764 users), which is mainly due to the increase in use among enrollees aged 50 and older after the removal of cost-sharing requirements for CRC screening and lab tests. f) Public Health. CHBRP projects no measurable public health impact on the diagnosis or prevention of CRC at the population level due to the small number (1,764) of additional enrollees who would avail themselves of CRC screening. At the individual level, this bill would likely yield health and quality of life improvements, such as reduced screening-related financial burden and identification of CRC at earlier, and therefore more treatable, stages. g) Long-term impacts. To the extent that this bill would AB 1763 Page 10 eliminate cost sharing for medically necessary additional CRC screenings and all events along the stepwise "continuum of screening," including follow-up colonoscopies to positive fecal tests and polyp removal during colonoscopies, it would be reasonable to assume that this reduction in financial burden would promote greater adherence to physician-recommended screenings beyond those projected for the first 12 months following implementation of the mandate 4)ACA Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) RELATED TO THIS BILL. The federal Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Treasury has published FAQs with answers related to provisions of the ACA. Set 12 of these FAQs include the following two that are relevant to this bill: a) Questions 5: If a colonoscopy is scheduled and performed as a screening procedure pursuant to the USPSTF recommendation, is it permissible for a plan or issuer to impose cost-sharing for the cost of a polyp removal during the colonoscopy? No. Based on clinical practice and comments received from the American College of Gastroenterology, American Gastroenterological Association, American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, and the Society for Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates, polyp removal is an integral part of a colonoscopy. Accordingly, the plan or issuer may not impose cost-sharing with respect to a polyp removal during a colonoscopy performed as a screening procedure. On the other hand, a plan or issuer may impose cost-sharing for a treatment that is not a recommended preventive service, even if the treatment results from a recommended preventive service. b) Question 7: Some USPSTF recommendations apply to certain populations identified as high-risk. Some individuals, for example, are at increased risk for AB 1763 Page 11 certain diseases because they have a family or personal history of the disease. It is not clear, however, how a plan or issuer would identify individuals who belong to a high-risk population. How can a plan or issuer determine when a service should or should not be covered without cost-sharing? Identification of "high-risk" individuals is determined by clinical expertise. Decisions regarding whether an individual is part of a high-risk population, and should therefore receive a specific preventive item or service identified for those at high-risk, should be made by the attending provider. Therefore, if the attending provider determines that a patient belongs to a high-risk population and a USPSTF recommendation applies to that high-risk population, that service is required to be covered in accordance with the requirements of the interim final regulations (that is, without cost-sharing, subject to reasonable medical management). 5)SUPPORT. The American Cancer Society Cancer Acton Network (ACS CAN), a cosponsor of this bill, states that CRC is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the US but is the most preventable with screening and early detection. Timely and appropriate screening can decrease CRC incidence and mortality by 30% to 60%. ACS CAN argues that the overall reduction of CRC incidence and mortality rates in the U.S. over the last few years has largely been attributed to increased preventative screening. Eliminating out-of-pocket cost? sharing for follow-up colonoscopy after a positive stool test will remove a significant barrier to CRC screening and it will greatly contribute to the goal of increasing the nation's CRC screening rate to 80% by 2018. The California Black AB 1763 Page 12 Health Network supports this bill because of the devastating incidence of CRC in the African-American community. CRC is the third most common cancer in both black men and women with incidence rates higher in black males and females compared to whites (27% and 22% respectively). Research has shown that limiting CRC screening choices to only colonoscopy can result in a lower CRC screening completion rate compared to providing an initial choice between colonoscopy and a stool-based test, particularly among communities of color. 6)OPPOSITION. The California Association of Health Plans argues that this bill will increase costs for employers and individuals by creating a new benefit mandate that expands CRC screening while prohibiting cost-sharing. Blue Shield of California (BSC) argues that new USPSTF screening recommendations expected later in 2016 are likely to be different than current ones, making this bill premature. BSC is also concerned with this bill's requirement to cover, at no share of cost, a broad array of additional screenings and tests recommended by a physician if a person is considered "high risk." Lastly, this bill is unclear in its intent to include secondary prevention. The Association of California Health Insurance Companies and America's Health Insurance Plans oppose all mandate bills introduced this year because of possible state financial exposure, the need for a robust health insurance marketplace offering competition and choice, and the fact that mandates stifle the use of innovative, evidence-based medicine. 7)OPPOSE UNLESS AMENDED. The California Chamber of Commerce has a number of concerns, including: a) this bill specifies coverage of certain screening tests that in the future may not meet USPSTF guidelines; b) this bill's definition of high risk differs from the Medicare definition; and, c) the cost impact of this bill falls on all enrollees, not only those in the 50-75 year age range. AB 1763 Page 13 8)PROPOSED AMENDMENTS. Amendments are proposed to clarify and narrow the scope of this bill, including: a) Delete the following language related to screening test coverage: The coverage shall include, at a minimum, all of the following: (1) High sensitivity fecal occult blood tests (FOBT). (2) Flexible sigmoidoscopy with high sensitivity FOBT. (3) Colonoscopies, including the removal of polyps during a screening procedure. b) Delete the following language related to high risk criteria: For purposes of this subdivision, an individual is at high risk for colorectal cancer if the individual has any of the following: (A) A family medical history of colorectal cancer. (B) A prior occurrence of cancer or precursor neoplastic polyps. (C) A prior occurrence of a chronic digestive disease condition, including, but not limited to, inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease, or ulcerative colitis. (D) Other predisposing factors. c) Clarify provisions regarding colonoscopy and polyp removal without cost sharing; and, d) Other technical changes. AB 1763 Page 14 REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: Support American Cancer Society Cancer Acton Network (cosponsor) California Colorectal Cancer Coalition (cosponsor) American College of Gastroenterology American College of Physicians American College of Surgeons American Gastrological Association American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy California Primary Care Association California Black Health Network Opposition America's Health Insurance Plans AB 1763 Page 15 Association of California Health Insurance Companies California Association of Health Plans Analysis Prepared by:John Gilman / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097