AB 1764, as amended, Waldron. California Health Benefit Review Program: financial impacts.
Existing law, until July 1, 2017, requests the University of California to establish the California Health Benefit Review Program to assess, among other things, legislation that proposes to mandate or repeal a mandated benefit or service, as defined. Existing law requests the University of California to prepare a written analysis with relevant data on public health, medical, financial, and other impacts of that legislation, as specified.
Existing law requests the University of California to provide the analysis to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature, as specified, and to submit a report to the Governor and the Legislature regarding the implementation of these provisions by January 1, 2017. Existing law establishes the Health Care Benefits Fund in the State Treasury to effectively support the University of California and its work in implementing these provisions.begin insert The California Health Benefit Review Program has been reauthorized since its predecessor was established in 2002.end insert
This bill would additionally request the University ofbegin delete Californiaend deletebegin insert California, commencing July 1, 2017,end insert to include in its analysis, as part of the financial impacts of the above legislation, relevant data on the impact of coverage or repeal of coverage of the benefit or service on anticipated costs or savings estimated upon implementation for the 2 subsequent state fiscal years and, if applicable, for the 5 subsequent state fiscal years, as specified.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Section 127660 of the Health and Safety Code
2 is amended to read:
(a) The Legislature hereby requests the University of
4California to establish the California Health Benefit Review
5Program to assess legislation proposing to mandate a benefit or
6service, as defined in subdivision (d), and legislation proposing to
7repeal a mandated benefit or service, as defined in subdivision (e),
8and to prepare a written analysis with relevant data on the
9following:
10(1) Public health impacts, including, but not limited to, all of
11the following:
12(A) The impact on the health of the community, including the
13reduction of communicable disease and the benefits of prevention
14such as those provided by childhood
immunizations and prenatal
15care.
16(B) The impact on the health of the community, including
17diseases and conditions where disparities in outcomes associated
18with the social determinants of health as well as gender, race,
19sexual orientation, or gender identity are established in
20peer-reviewed scientific and medical literature.
21(C) The extent to which the benefit or service reduces premature
22death and the economic loss associated with disease.
23(2) Medical impacts, including, but not limited to, all of the
24following:
25(A) The extent to which the benefit or service is generally
26recognized by the medical community as being effective in the
P3 1screening,
diagnosis, or treatment of a condition or disease, as
2demonstrated by a review of scientific and peer-reviewed medical
3literature.
4(B) The extent to which the benefit or service is generally
5available and utilized by treating physicians.
6(C) The contribution of the benefit or service to the health status
7of the population, including the results of any research
8demonstrating the efficacy of the benefit or service compared to
9alternatives, including not providing the benefit or service.
10(D) The extent to which mandating or repealing the benefits or
11services would not diminish or eliminate access to currently
12available health care benefits or services.
13(3) Financial impacts, including, but not limited to, all of the
14following:
15(A) The extent to which the coverage or repeal of coverage will
16increase or decrease the benefit or cost of the benefit or service.
17(B) The extent to which the coverage or repeal of coverage will
18increase the utilization of the benefit or service, or will be a
19substitute for, or affect the cost of, alternative benefits or services.
20(C) The extent to which the coverage or repeal of coverage will
21increase or decrease the administrative expenses of health care
22service plans and health insurers and the premium and expenses
23of subscribers, enrollees, and policyholders.
24(D) The impact of this
coverage or repeal of coverage on the
25total cost of health care.
26(E) begin deleteThe end deletebegin insertCommencing July 1, 2017, the end insertimpact of this coverage
27or repeal of coverage on anticipated costs or savings estimated
28upon implementation for the following periods:
29(i) The two subsequent state fiscal years.
30(ii) If applicable, the five subsequent state fiscal years through
31a longer-range estimate.
32(F) The potential cost or savings to the private sector, including
33the impact on small employers as defined in paragraph (1) of
34
subdivision (l) of Section 1357, the Public Employees’ Retirement
35System, other retirement systems funded by the state or by a local
36government, individuals purchasing individual health insurance,
37and publicly funded state health insurance programs, including
38the Medi-Cal program and the Healthy Families Program.
P4 1(G) The extent to which costs resulting from lack of coverage
2or repeal of coverage are or would be shifted to other payers,
3including both public and private entities.
4(H) The extent to which mandating or repealing the proposed
5benefit or service would not diminish or eliminate access to
6currently available health care benefits or services.
7(I) The extent to which the benefit or service is generally utilized
8by
a significant portion of the population.
9(J) The extent to which health care coverage for the benefit or
10service is already generally available.
11(K) The level of public demand for health care coverage for the
12benefit or service, including the level of interest of collective
13bargaining agents in negotiating privately for inclusion of this
14coverage in group contracts, and the extent to which the mandated
15benefit or service is covered by self-funded employer groups.
16(L) In assessing and preparing a written analysis of the financial
17impact of legislation proposing to mandate a benefit or service and
18legislation proposing to repeal a mandated benefit or service
19pursuant to this paragraph, the Legislature requests the University
20of
California to use a certified actuary or other person with relevant
21knowledge and expertise to determine the financial impact.
22(4) The impact on essential health benefits, as defined in Section
231367.005 of this code and Section 10112.27 of the Insurance Code,
24and the impact on the California Health Benefit Exchange.
25(b) The Legislature further requests that the California Health
26Benefit Review Program assess legislation that impacts health
27insurance benefit design, cost sharing, premiums, and other health
28insurance topics.
29(c) The Legislature requests that the University of California
30provide every analysis to the appropriate policy and fiscal
31committees of the Legislature not later than 60 days, or in a manner
32and
pursuant to a timeline agreed to by the Legislature and the
33California Health Benefit Review Program, after receiving a request
34made pursuant to Section 127661. In addition, the Legislature
35requests that the university post every analysis on the Internet and
36make every analysis available to the public upon request.
37(d) As used in this section, “legislation proposing to mandate a
38benefit or service” means a proposed statute that requires a health
39care service plan or a health insurer, or both, to do any of the
40following:
P5 1(1) Permit a person insured or covered under the policy or
2contract to obtain health care treatment or services from a particular
3type of health care provider.
4(2) Offer or provide coverage for the
screening, diagnosis, or
5treatment of a particular disease or condition.
6(3) Offer or provide coverage of a particular type of health care
7treatment or service, or of medical equipment, medical supplies,
8or drugs used in connection with a health care treatment or service.
9(e) As used in this section, “legislation proposing to repeal a
10mandated benefit or service” means a proposed statute that, if
11enacted, would become operative on or after January 1, 2008, and
12would repeal an existing requirement that a health care service
13plan or a health insurer, or both, do any of the following:
14(1) Permit a person insured or covered under the policy or
15contract to obtain health care treatment or services from a particular
16type of health
care provider.
17(2) Offer or provide coverage for the screening, diagnosis, or
18treatment of a particular disease or condition.
19(3) Offer or provide coverage of a particular type of health care
20treatment or service, or of medical equipment, medical supplies,
21or drugs used in connection with a health care treatment or service.
O
96