BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 1787 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 6, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Lorena Gonzalez, Chair AB 1787 (Gomez) - As Introduced February 4, 2016 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy |Natural Resources |Vote:|7 - 0 | |Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: NoReimbursable: No SUMMARY: This bill requires the cross-media enforcement unit within the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) to prioritize the state's most disadvantaged communities. Specifically, this bill: 1)Requires the cross-media enforcement unit to prioritize the state's most disadvantaged communities when exercising its AB 1787 Page 2 authority. 2)Defines "state's most disadvantaged communities" as communities identified by the California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool (CalEnviroScreen) as the disadvantaged communities most disproportionately burdened and vulnerable to multiple sources of pollution. FISCAL EFFECT No additional state costs. COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. According to the author, it is critically important for state regulators to make concerted efforts to enforce the law against polluters who have, with impunity, been building and operating facilities in disadvantaged, low-income, and minority communities who lack the resources, support, and capacity to demand swift corrective action. 2)Background. In 2013, CalEPA established an Environmental Justice Compliance and Enforcement Working Group (working group) to improve multi-media enforcement and environmental justice efforts. Cross or multi-media enforcement refers to the coordinated regulation and enforcement of multiple sources of pollution in the same area. The working group includes representatives from the CalEPA boards, departments, and offices, as well as local agencies that have enforcement authority. AB 1787 Page 3 According to CalEPA, the primary objective of the working group is to coordinate compliance assistance and enforcement activities in the state's most disadvantaged communities, where multiple sources of pollution exist and residents are disproportionately vulnerable. The working group's first initiative was conducted in 2013 and 2014 in Fresno. It included community consultation, compliance assistance for regulated entities, and coordinated, multi-agency compliance sweeps. The initiative overall resulted in 46 citations for violations of air pollution regulations and 3 enforcement actions relating to improper management of hazardous waste. The working group is in the process of selecting the next community for an initiative. This bill codifies existing activities and requires CalEPA to continue this effort going forward. 3)Environmental Justice. Environmental Justice refers to the fair treatment of people of all races, cultures, and incomes with respect to the development, adoption, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations and policies. According to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), approximately 8 million Californians (21%) live in zip codes considered to be "highly impacted" by environmental, public health, and socioeconomic stressors. Nearly half of all Californians live within six miles of a facility that is a significant greenhouse gas emitter (46%), but they are disproportionately people of color (62%). Throughout California, people of color face a 50% higher risk of cancer from ambient concentrations of air pollutants listed under the Clean Air Act. ARB estimates that air pollution exposure accounts for 19,000 premature deaths, 280,000 cases AB 1787 Page 4 of asthma, and 1.9 million lost work days every year. Additionally, enforcement of environmental laws tends to be more rigorous in white and more affluent communities; whereas, lower income communities and communities of color tend to correlate with fewer inspections and enforcement actions. 4)Disadvantaged Communities. In 2012, SB 535 (De Leon), Chapter 830, required CalEPA to identify disadvantaged communities for investment opportunities using AB 32 cap-and-trade revenues. In response, OEHHA developed CalEnviroScreen to use existing environmental, health, and socioeconomic data to determine the extent to which communities across the state are burdened by and vulnerable to pollution. OEHHA states that the results generated by CalEnviroScreen are not intended to assign responsibility for any issues identified. The intent is to provide information that enables the state to focus time, resources, and programs on areas in the greatest need of assistance. Analysis Prepared by:Jennifer Galehouse / APPR. / (916) 319-2081