AB 1833, as introduced, Linder. Transportation projects: environmental mitigation.
(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, as defined, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect, subject to certain exceptions.
The bill would create the Advanced Mitigation Program in the Department of Transportation to implement environmental mitigation measures in advance of future transportation projects.
(2) Existing federal law requires the United States Secretary of Transportation to carry out a surface transportation project delivery program, under which the participating states assume certain responsibilities for environmental review and clearance of transportation projects that would otherwise be the responsibility of the federal government. Existing law, until January 1, 2017, provides that the State of California consents to the jurisdiction of the federal courts with regard to the compliance, discharge, or enforcement of the responsibilities the Department of Transportation assumed as a participant in this program.
This bill would delete the January 1, 2017, repeal date and thereby extend these provisions indefinitely.
(3) Existing federal law requires the United States Secretary of Transportation to select, from states already approved to assume the above-referenced federal responsibilities for environmental review and clearance of transportation projects, a maximum of 5 states to participate in a program under which states may conduct environmental reviews and make approvals for projects under state environmental laws and regulations rather than under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, subject to certain conditions, including the consent of participating states to the jurisdiction of the federal courts in these matters.
This bill would extend the consent of the State of California to the jurisdiction of the federal courts with regard to the compliance, discharge, or enforcement of the responsibilities the Department of Transportation may assume as a participant in this program.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 800) is
2added to Chapter 4 of Division 1 of the Streets and Highways
3Code, to read:
4
(a) The Advanced Mitigation Program is hereby created
8in the department to accelerate project delivery and improve
9environmental outcomes of environmental mitigation for
10transportation infrastructure projects.
11(b) For the purposes of this article, “advanced mitigation” means
12mitigation implemented before, and in anticipation of,
13environmental effects of future transportation projects. This
14program may utilize mitigation instruments including, but not
15limited to, mitigation banks, in lieu of fee programs, and
16conservation easements as defined in Section 815.1 of the Civil
17Code.
P3 1(c) The department shall track all implemented advanced
2mitigation projects to use as credits for
environmental mitigation
3for state-sponsored transportation projects.
4(d) The department may use advanced mitigation credits to
5fulfill mitigation requirements of any environmental law for a
6transportation project eligible for the State Transportation
7Improvement Program or the State Highway Operation and
8Protection Program.
9(e) No later than February 1, 2017, the department shall establish
10an interagency transportation advanced mitigation steering
11committee consisting of the department and appropriate state and
12federal agencies to support the Advanced Mitigation Program so
13that advanced mitigation can be used as required mitigation for
14future transportation projects and provide improved environmental
15outcomes. The committee shall advise the department of
16opportunities to carry out advanced mitigation projects, provide
17the best available science, and actively participate in
mitigation
18instrument reviews and approvals. The committee shall seek to
19develop streamlining opportunities, including those related to
20landscape scale mitigation planning, and alignment of federal and
21state regulations and procedures related to mitigation requirements
22and implementation. The committee shall also provide input on
23crediting, using, and tracking of advanced mitigation investments.
Section 820.1 of the Streets and Highways Code is
25amended to read:
(a) The State of California consents to the jurisdiction
27of the federal courts with regard to the compliance, discharge, or
28enforcement of the responsibilities assumed by the department
29pursuant to Section 326 of,begin delete andend delete subsection (a) of Section 327 of,
30begin insert and Section 330 of,end insert Title 23 of the United States Code.
31(b) In any action brought pursuant to the federal laws described
32in subdivision (a), no immunity from suit may be asserted by the
33department pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment to the United
34States Constitution, and any immunity is hereby waived.
35(c) The department shall not delegate any of its responsibilities
36assumed pursuant to the federal laws described in subdivision (a)
37to any political subdivision of the state or its instrumentalities.
38(d) The department shall, no later than January 1, 2016, submit
39a report to the Legislature that includes thebegin delete following:end deletebegin insert following
40with respect to responsibilities assumed by the department pursuant
P4 1to Section 326 of, and subsection (a) of Section 327 of, Title 23 of
2the United States Code:end insert
3(1) A comparative analysis of the environmental review process
4under the National Environmental Policy Act (Chapter 55
5(commencing with Section
4321) of Title 42 of the United States
6Code) for the 30 projects, excluding those projects categorically
7excluded from environmental review, undertaken immediately
8preceding the enactment of this section that involved the Federal
9Highway Administration and the environmental review process
10for all projects, excluding those projects categorically excluded
11from environmental review, undertaken following the enactment
12of this section that did not involve the Federal Highway
13Administration. This analysis shall include department- and local
14agency-sponsored projects, and shall address the following:
15(A) For each project included in the analysis, the environmental
16review process under the National Environmental Policy Act,
17including which state and federal agencies reviewed the
18environmental documents and the amount of time the documents
19were reviewed by each agency, shall be described.
20(B) The points in the environmental review process under the
21National Environmental Policy Act when project delays occurred
22and the nature of the delays.
23(C) The time saved in the environmental review process for
24projects undertaken following the enactment of this section in
25comparison to the review process for projects undertaken prior to
26the enactment of this section, and the points in the review process
27when time was saved.
28(D) The circumstances when the Federal Highway
29Administration hindered and facilitated project delivery.
30(2) All financial costs incurred by the department to assume the
31responsibilities pursuant to Section 326 of, and subsection (a) of
32Section 327 of, Title 23 of the United States Code, including, but
33not limited to, the following:
34(A) Personnel to conduct and review environmental documents
35and to manage litigation.
36(B) Administrative costs.
37(C) Litigation.
38(3) An explanation of all litigation initiated against the
39department for the responsibilities assumed pursuant to Section
P5 1326 of, subsection (a) of Section 327 of, Title 23 of the United
2States Code.
3(4) A comparison of all costs and benefits of assuming these
4responsibilities.
5(5) An assessment of overall project delivery time from the time
6environmental studies begin to the time the project is ready to
7advertise for construction, including the time required for each
8project phase and distinguishing
between different types of
9environmental documents and between projects on the state
10highway system and local assistance projects. The department may
11also include other variables that it determines may be useful in the
12assessment.
13(e) (1) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1,
142017, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute,
15that is enacted before January 1, 2017, deletes or extends that date.
16(2) The state shall remain liable for any decisions made, or
17responsibilities assumed and exercised, prior to the repeal of this
18section under this subdivision, pursuant to applicable federal
19statutes of limitation for filing citizens’ suits in federal court.
20(f)
end delete
21begin insert(e)end insert Nothing in this section affects the obligation of the
22department to comply with state and federal law.
O
99