BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 1836 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 6, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Lorena Gonzalez, Chair AB 1836 (Maienschein) - As Amended: March 31, 2016 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy |Health |Vote:|15 - 0 | |Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | |Judiciary | |10 - 0 | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: YesReimbursable: Yes SUMMARY: This bill allows a probate court to recommend a Lanterman-Petris-Short (LPS) conservatorship for an individual for whom a conservatorship has been established under the Probate Code, subject to a hearing attended by the proposed conservatee or the proposed conservatee's counsel, as specified. It also requires the officer providing conservatorship AB 1836 Page 2 investigation to file a copy of his or her report with the court making the recommendation in the probate conservatorship within 30 days of the recommendation. FISCAL EFFECT: 1)Potential state-reimbursable mandate costs, conservatively in the hundreds of thousands of dollars annually, as this bill is likely to compel a greater number of conservatorship investigations and reports. These costs are likely to be state-reimbursable. 2)In addition, counties could incur significant unknown costs associated with a larger number of conservatees, potentially resulting in cost shifting from one segment of local government to another. These costs are not state- reimbursable. COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. According to the author, many seriously mentally ill persons who might benefit from an LPS conservatorship cannot obtain it because their condition does not rise to the level of creating a "danger to themselves or others," as is required to trigger the "5150" and the eventual LPS process. This bill, therefore, would create an additional means by which an LPS conservatorship may be recommended to the county conservatorship investigator. AB 1836 Page 3 2)Background. California has two types of conservatorships. Probate conservatorships - established under the Probate Code - are established for adults who cannot adequately care for basic personal needs. Most probate conservatee are elderly persons, but can also include younger adults with severe developmental disabilities. Conservatorships established under the Lanterman-Petris-Short (LPS) Act, on the other hand, are for persons who are gravely disabled by mental illness or who pose a threat to themselves or others. LPS conservatorships are created when a psychiatric facility in which the prospective conservatee is held makes a recommendation to the county conservatorship investigator, who in turn may petition a superior court for the conservatorship. A probate conservatorship does not allow the conservator to compel medical treatment on behalf of the conservatee if the conservatee refuses. The LPS conservator, on the other hand, may, ordered by the court, compel psychiatric treatment and placement in a locked facility for a conservatee who is unwilling to accept voluntary treatment. Individuals can only enter an LPS conservatorship through a the "5150 hold" process, specified in Welfare and Institutions Code 5150, whereby an officer or clinician may involuntarily detain a person suspected to have a mental disorder that makes him or her a danger to self, a danger to others, and/or is gravely disabled. An individual enters into an LPS conservatorship via an initial 72-hour 5150 hold for assessment, evaluation, and crisis intervention, which is then extended for a period of 14 or 30 days. After this period, if AB 1836 Page 4 warranted, an authorized individual may recommend that the county conservatorship investigator petition the superior court for a year-long LPS conservatorship. For someone already in a probate conservatorship, this bill would bypass the requirement for a 5150 hold and associated statutory protections by allowing a probate court to directly recommend an LPS conservatorship to the county conservatorship investigator. It is important to note this bill does not permit the court to establish an LPS conservatorship on its own motion; rather, this bill permits the court to make a recommendation, based on medical evidence, to the county conservatorship investigator. It would still be up to the investigator, if he or she concurs with the court, to act on that recommendation and petition a superior court for an LPS conservatorship. 3)Opposition. The California State Association of Counties (CSAC) and the California Behavioral Health Directors Association (CBHDA), and the Urban Counties Caucus oppose this bill, citing primarily workload and cost burdens on an overburdened public guardian system. Opposition believes the probate court authority to compel investigations will be used liberally and lead to many more unnecessary and inappropriate investigations. 4)Prior Legislation. AB 1836 Page 5 a) AB 193 (Maienschein) of 2015 was similar to this bill and was vetoed by the Governor, who stated: "I am returning Assembly Bill 193 without my signature. This bill would authorize a probate court to order an investigation for a Lanterman-Petris-Short conservatorship for an individual currently under probate conservatorship. Currently, professionals in charge of county mental health facilities are responsible for recommending an investigation for a Lanterman-Petris-Short conservatorship. This bill bypasses the clinical expertise of these professionals and for that reason I can't support it." b) AB 1725 (Maienschein) of 2014 was similar to this bill. It was held on the Suspense File of this committee. c) AB 987 (Maienschein) of 2014, which died without a hearing in the Assembly Health Committee, would have required the conservatorship investigator to petition for conservatorship if specified professional staff of a treatment facility recommends conservatorship, thereby eliminating the conservatorship investigator's discretion to not concur with the professional staff's recommendation. Analysis Prepared by:Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916) 319-2081 AB 1836 Page 6