BILL NUMBER: AB 1841	AMENDED
	BILL TEXT

	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY  MARCH 28, 2016

INTRODUCED BY   Assembly Member Irwin

                        FEBRUARY 9, 2016

   An act to add Article 6.4 (commencing with Section 8592.30) to
Chapter 7 of Division 1 of Title 2 of the Government Code, relating
to emergency services.



	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


   AB 1841, as amended, Irwin. Office of Emergency Services: duties:
cybersecurity.
   (1) The California Emergency Services Act sets forth the duties of
the Office of Emergency Services with respect to specified emergency
preparedness, mitigation, and response activities within the state.
   This bill would require the Office of Emergency Services to
 develop and  transmit to the  Legislature a
state-wide emergency services response plan for cybersecurity
attacks on critical infrastructure systems, as defined. 
 Legislature, on or before July 1, 2017, the Cyber Security Annex
to the State Emergency Plan, also known as Emergency Function 18 or
EF 18.  The bill would further require the office to develop a
comprehensive cybersecurity strategy setting standards for state
agencies, as defined,  and private entities to  
to, among other things,  prepare for cybersecurity 
attacks on   interference with, or the compromise or
incapacitation of,  critical infrastructure  systems.
The bill   and  would require state 
agencies, and authorize private entities,   agencies
 to report its  cybersecurity strategy  
compliance with these standards  to the office. The bill would
require the office to provide suggestions for  improvement to
the cybersecurity strategy of a state agency, and authorize the
office to do the same for a private entity, but only for purposes of
protecting public health and safety.   a state agency to
improve compliance with these standards.  The bill would
prohibit public disclosure of  the office's state-wide
emergency services response plan and   public records
relating to  the  individual  cybersecurity
strategies of state  agencies and private entities. 
 agencies, as specified. 
   (2) Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that
limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the
writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings
demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need
for protecting that interest.
   This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
   Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: no.


THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  SECTION 1.  The Legislature finds and declares all the following:
   (a) The current pervasive use of information technology in public
 and private  enterprises has resulted in an
abundance of public access to information and services provided by
the  government and businesses,   government,
 but the increased interdependence  on   of
 information technology systems has created a new type of risk
for society.  Cybersecurity threats   Threats
 to public  and private  critical
infrastructure  systems  that use information
technology within the state present risks to public health and safety
and could severely disrupt  private  economic
activity within California.
   (b) Ensuring sufficient preparations are taken to protect 
these  critical infrastructure  systems 
from  attacks to cybersecurity   interference,
compromise, or incapacitation  are in the public interest and
serve a public purpose.
   (c) A comprehensive cybersecurity strategy, undertaken in a
coordinated effort between  federal and state governments and
private entities,   state agencies,  will help
prepare for  cyberattacks on these   threats to
 critical  infrastructure systems,  
infrastructure,  thereby reducing the potential consequences
from those attacks.
   (d) The Office of Emergency Services, in its role as the lead
executive entity that coordinates state resources for emergency
preparedness, response, and damage mitigation, is  the proper
  a  state entity  appropriate  to
develop, implement, and manage a comprehensive cybersecurity
strategy, undertaken in a coordinated effort between  federal
and state governments and private entities,   state
agencies,  to protect  these  critical 
infrastructure systems from attacks to cybersecurity.  
infrastructure.  The Office of Emergency Services is already
developing the necessary expertise in cybersecurity through its
current work developing methods to provide emergency services during
 a cyberattack.   an interference with, or the
compromise or incapacitation of, critical infrastructure. 
   (e) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this
legislation to develop a comprehensive cybersecurity strategy,
undertaken in a coordinated effort between  federal and state
governments and private entities,   state agencies,
 to prepare California for  cyberattacks on 
 threats to  critical infrastructure  systems
 under the unifying coordination of the Office of Emergency
Services.
  SEC. 2.  Article 6.4 (commencing with Section 8592.30) is added to
Chapter 7 of Division 1 of Title 2 of the Government Code, to read:

      Article 6.4.  Cybersecurity


   8592.30.  (a) For purposes of this article, "critical
infrastructure systems" shall mean a public or private information
technology system that services any of the following sectors:
   (1) Communications.
   (2) Emergency services.
   (3) Energy.
   (4) Financial Services.
   (5) Food and Agriculture.
   (6) Healthcare and public health.
   (7) Transportation systems.
   (8) Water and wastewater systems.
   (b) 
    8592.30.    As used in this article, the following
definitions shall apply:  
   (a) "Critical infrastructure" means systems and assets so vital to
the state that the incapacity or destruction of those systems or
assets would have a debilitating impact on security, economic
security, public health and safety, or any combination of those
matters.  
   (b) "Critical infrastructure information" means information not
customarily in the public domain pertaining to any of the following:
 
   (1) Actual, potential, or threatened interference with, or an
attack on, compromise of, or incapacitation of critical
infrastructure by either physical or computer-based attack or other
similar conduct, including, but not limited to, the misuse of, or
unauthorized access to, all types of communications and data
transmission systems, that violates federal, state, or local law,
harms economic security, or threatens public health or safety. 

   (2) The ability of critical infrastructure to resist any
interference, compromise, or incapacitation, including, but not
limited to, any planned or past assessment or estimate of the
vulnerability of critical infrastructure, including, but not limited
to, security testing, risk evaluation, risk management planning, or
risk audits.  
   (3) Any planned or past operational problem or solution regarding
critical infrastructure, including, but not limited to, repair,
recovery, reconstruction, insurance, or continuity, to the extent it
is related to interference, compromise, or incapacitation of critical
infrastructure. 
    (c)  "Secretary"  shall mean  
means  the secretary of each state agency as set forth in
subdivision (a) of Section 12800. 
    (c) 
    (d)  "State agency" or "state agencies"  shall
have   means  the same  meaning 
as "state agency" as set forth in Section 11000.
   8592.35.  (a) On or before July 1, 2017, the office shall transmit
to the Legislature  a state-wide emergency services response
plan for cybersecurity attacks on critical infrastructure systems
  the Cyber Security Annex to the State Emergency Plan,
also known as Emergency Function 18 or EF 18,  that includes,
but is not limited to, all of the following:
   (1) Methods for providing emergency services.
   (2) Command structure for state-wide coordinated emergency
services.
   (3) Emergency service roles of appropriate state agencies.
   (4) Identification of resources to be mobilized.
   (5) Public information plans.
   (6) Continuity of government services.
   (b)  Notwithstanding Section 9795, the   The
 office shall transmit the plan to the Legislature  by
providing a printed copy to the Secretary of the Senate and the Chief
Clerk of the Assembly.   pursuant to Section 9795.

   8592.40.  (a) On or before July 1, 2018, the office shall develop
a comprehensive cybersecurity strategy setting standards for state
agencies  and private entities  to prepare for
cybersecurity  attacks on   interference with,
or the compromise or incapacitation of,  critical infrastructure
 systems.   and the development of critical
infrastructure information, and to   transmit critical
infrastructure information to the office.  In developing the
standards, the office shall consider all of the following:
   (1) Costs to implement the standards. 
   (2) Regional business impacts.  
   (3) National  
   (2) Security of critical infrastructure information.  
   (3) Centralized management of risk. 
    (4)     National  private industry
best practices.
   (b) The office shall post the cybersecurity strategy on the
Internet Web site of the office and transmit a copy to each
secretary.
   8592.45.  (a) Each state agency shall  transmit a
cybersecurity strategy that meets the standards set forth in
  report on their compliance with the standards
developed pursuant to  Section 8592.40 to the office in the
manner and at the time directed by the  office. 
 office but no later than January 1, 2019. 
   (b) The office shall provide suggestions for  improvement
to the cybersecurity strategy of a state agency, if any, 
 a state agency to improve compliance with the standards
developed pursuant to Section 8592.40, if any,  to the head of
the state agency and the secretary responsible for the state agency.
For a state agency that is not under the responsibility of a
secretary, the office shall provide  any  suggestions
 for improvement to a cybersecurity strategy, if any,
 to the head of the state agency and the Governor. 
   8592.50.  (a) A private entity may transmit a cybersecurity
strategy that meets the standards set forth in Section 8592.40 to the
office.
   (b) The office shall review and provide suggestions for
improvement, if any, to the cybersecurity strategy of a private
entity for the purposes of protecting public health and safety, and
shall not review or make suggestions to the cybersecurity strategy of
a private entity solely for the private benefit of the private
entity. 
    8592.55.   8592.50    (a)
 The  plan required by Section 8592.35, a state
agency cybersecurity strategy   report  required by
 subdivision (a) of  Section  8592.45, or a private
entity cybersecurity strategy authorized by Section 8592.50 are
  8592.45 and any public records relating to any
communication made pursuant to, or in furtherance of the purposes of,
subdivision (b) of Section 8592.45 are  confidential and shall
not be disclosed pursuant to any state law, including, but not
limited to, the California Public Records Act (Chapter 3.5
(commencing with Section 6250) of Division 7 of Title 1). 
   (b) The report to the Legislature required by Section 8592.35
shall not be subject to production pursuant to the Legislative Open
Records Act (Article 3.5 (commencing with Section 9070) of Chapter
1.5 of Part 1 of Division 2). 
  SEC. 3.  The Legislature finds and declares that Section 2 of this
act, which adds Section  8592.55   8592.50 
to the Government Code, imposes a limitation on the public's right
of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public
officials and agencies within the meaning of Section 3 of Article I
of the California Constitution. Pursuant to that constitutional
provision, the Legislature makes the following findings to
demonstrate the interest protected by this limitation and the need
for protecting that interest:
   Preventing public disclosure of the  Office of Emergency
Services' state-wide emergency services response plan for
cybersecurity attacks on critical infrastructure systems and the
   individual cybersecurity  strategies
  preparations  of state agencies  and
private entities  promotes public safety by prohibiting
access to those who would use that information to thwart the
cybersecurity of critical infrastructure  systems 
within the state.