BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 1843 Page A Date of Hearing: April 6, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT Roger Hernández, Chair AB 1843 (Mark Stone) - As Introduced February 9, 2016 SUBJECT: Applicants for employment: criminal history SUMMARY: Prohibits an employer, whether a public agency or private individual or corporation, from asking an applicant for employment to disclose, through any written form or verbally, or from utilizing as a factor in determining any condition of employment, information concerning an arrest or detention that did not result in specific juvenile court actions or that has been judicially dismissed or ordered sealed pursuant to law. EXISTING LAW: 1)Prohibits an employer, whether a public agency or private individual or corporation, from asking an applicant for employment to disclose, or from utilizing as a factor in determining any condition of employment, information concerning an arrest or detention that did not result in a conviction, or information concerning a referral or participation in, any pretrial or post trial diversion program, except as specified. 2)Prohibits an employer, as specified, from asking an applicant AB 1843 Page B to disclose, or from utilizing as a factor in determining any condition of employment, information concerning a conviction that has been judicially dismissed or ordered sealed, except in specified circumstances. Existing law also makes it a crime to intentionally violate these provisions. 3)Provides that no employer, whether a public agency or private individual or corporation, shall ask an applicant for employment to disclose, through any written form or verbally, information concerning an arrest or detention that did not result in conviction, or information concerning a referral to, and participation in, any pretrial or post trial diversion program, nor shall any employer seek from any source whatsoever, or utilize, as a factor in determining any condition of employment including, hiring, promotion, termination, record of arrest or detention that did not result in conviction. 4)Provides for a process for a court to allow a defendant to withdraw his or her plea or set aside verdict of guilty and dismiss the accusation or information if the defendant has fulfilled the conditions of probation for the entire period of probation, or who has been discharged prior to the termination for the period of probation, or in any other case in which the interests of justice, determines that a defendant should be granted relief available. FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown COMMENTS: The author argues that, current law protects the records of adults who have had arrests that did not lead to conviction and adults who have had their records ordered or automatically sealed from disclosure by potential employers during the hiring process. The legal effect of sealing and dismissal is that the offense is deemed not to have occurred and can be handled as such by job and college applicants in the future. This bill ensures that juveniles are guaranteed the same protections against employer inquiries into criminal AB 1843 Page C histories as adults. Considering the negative effect that criminal records may have on job seekers' employment prospects, this bill provides much needed relief to youth and adults who have paid their debts to society and are seeking to improve their lives, the lives of their families, and their communities. An Urban Institute Justice Policy Center Study on Employment after Prison states that, "Employment is an important component of the reentry process. Even more than a steady source of income, jobs can provide a sense of structure and responsibility to former prisoners as they struggle to reintegrate after release. Unfortunately, many will face a difficult path toward finding and keeping employment? While {this} is only one among a number of challenges for returning prisoners, it can have an enormous impact on the success of releases in avoiding recidivism and in improving their quality of life after release. Addressing the employment status of releases is thus key to increasing the chances for positive outcomes for this population." <1> Arrest records and probation records can be damaging on an individual's ability to pursue higher education or find a job. This bill will further the dual purposes of the juvenile justice system: rehabilitation and reintegration, by better ensuring that juveniles and juvenile offenders have a clear pathway to rehabilitation, when in compliance with existing statutory and probationary requirements. The bill recognizes the established role of California's Juvenile Courts as institutions of reform, not punishment, and will help individuals with juvenile records --------------------------- <1> Urban Institute Study, Employment after Prison: A Longitudinal Study of Releases in Three States. October 20, 2008. http://www.urban.org/research/publication/employment-after-prison -longitudinal-study-releasees-three-states AB 1843 Page D to find and hold jobs, and become fully functioning members of society. Background on Sealing and Destruction of Records Existing law provides for an expungement process. A person can seek to have records dismissed after she or he has fulfilled her or his probation or parole period. While granting of the expungement releases a person from all penalties and disabilities resulting from the offense, the release is not absolute. The expunged offense can still be used as a prior conviction for the purposes of a subsequent conviction and for other specified purposes - for example, owning a firearm or holding public office. Minor's adjudicated delinquent in juvenile court proceedings may petition the court to have their records sealed unless they were found to have committed certain serious offenses, under Welfare and Institutions Code section 781. A person may have his or her juvenile court records sealed by petitioning the court, five years or more after the jurisdiction of the juvenile court has terminated over the person adjudged a ward of the court or after the minor appeared before a probation officer, or, in any case, at any time after the person has reached the age of 18. Once the court has ordered the records sealed, the proceedings in the case shall be deemed never to have occurred, and the person may properly reply accordingly to any inquiry about the events. The relief consists of sealing all of the records related to the case, including the arrest record, court records, entries on dockets, and any other papers and exhibits. The court must send a copy of the order to each agency and official named in the petition for sealing records, directing the agency to seal its records and stating the date thereafter to destroy the sealed records. The court may also order the dismissal of a minor's juvenile AB 1843 Page E court case and have the court records sealed without a petition from the minor if the minor has been found to have satisfactorily completed an informal program of supervision or probation, except in specified cases. Upon sealing of the record, the arrest upon which the judgment was deferred shall be deemed to have never occurred. The court shall order sealed all records in its custody pertaining to a petition dismissed. Arguments in Support This bill is sponsored by the Juvenile Court Judges of California; they state that, "It has been a surprise for many to realize that under current law, people with sealed juvenile records do not have the same rights as those with sealed criminal records? Not only is this treatment unequal and unfair, but California law attempts to give juveniles an opportunity to demonstrate they can be rehabilitated. Regrettably, existing law does not reflect state policy regarding rehabilitation. Juvenile records should be treated in the same way that adult criminal records are treated when an employer is questioning a job applicant. Employer questioning about sealed juvenile records should be prohibited." There is no known opposition is on file. Prior Related Legislation AB 666 (Mark Stone) Chapter 368, Statutes of 2015 requires records in the custody of law enforcement agencies, the probation department, or any other public agency having records pertaining to the case, to also be sealed, in a case where a AB 1843 Page F court has ordered a juvenile's records to be sealed, as specified. SB 1038 (Leno) Chapter 249, Statutes of 2014 provides for the automatic dismissal of juvenile petitions and sealing of records when a juvenile offender successfully completes probation. AB 1756 (Skinner) from 2013 would have provided that only a person 26 years of age or older may be charged the existing fee of up to $150 for petitioning the court for an order sealing his or her criminal record. AB 1756 was held on the Senate Appropriation Committee Suspense File. SB 530 (Wright) Chapter 721, Statutes of 2013 excludes prior criminal convictions from consideration in employment decisions when the conviction has been judicially dismissed or the record has been expunged or sealed. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: Support California Catholic Conference California Judges Association Juvenile Court Judges of California LIUNA Local 777 AB 1843 Page G LIUNA Local 792 National Association of Social Workers - California Chapter Opposition None on file Analysis Prepared by:Taylor Jackson / L. & E. / (916) 319-2091