BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 1845


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  April 13, 2016


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                               Lorena Gonzalez, Chair


          AB  
          1845 (Dahle) - As Introduced February 9, 2016


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Water, Parks and Wildlife      |Vote:|15 - 0       |
          |Committee:   |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  NoReimbursable:  No


          SUMMARY:


          This bill allows the Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) to  
          authorize the take of rough sculpin, a fully protected fish,  
          resulting from the repair of Spring Creek Bridge in Shasta  
          County. Specifically, this bill:


          1)Requires conditions of the California Endangered Species Act  
            (CESA) to be met including the following: 








                                                                    AB 1845


                                                                    Page  2






               a)     The take is incidental to an otherwise lawful  
                 activity.
               b)     Impacts of the take are minimized and fully  
                 mitigated.


               c)     The lead agency provides adequate funding for  
                 monitoring.


               d)     The take permit will not jeopardize the continuing  
                 existence of the species.


               e)     The project includes all further measures necessary  
                 to meet the conservation standard established by law.





          2)Provides the authorization for take of rough sculpin is not to  
            be construed to exempt the project from any other law.


          FISCAL EFFECT:


          The costs to DFW are absorbable within existing resources.


          COMMENTS:


          1)Purpose. The author intends the incidental take authorization  
            provided by this bill to allow the repair of the Spring Creek  
            Bridge over the Fall River in Shasta County.  Without these  
            repairs, the bridge will close indefinitely cutting off access  








                                                                    AB 1845


                                                                    Page  3





            to private homes as well as public forest lands forcing the  
            use of unmaintained, narrow roads for access.  If there were  
            to be a fire or major emergency, access would be questionable  
            as some emergency vehicles would not be able to gain access  
            which becomes an issue of public safety. 



          2)Background.  The rough sculpin occurs only in Shasta County in  
            the Pit River, in the Burney Falls area, including Hat Creek,  
            Fall River and its tributaries, in the upper reaches of Lake  
            Britton near Hat Creek, and in Crystal Lake.   According to  
            DFW, due to the limited range of the rough sculpin, any impact  
            to their habitat is significant and prohibited by current law.



          3)Fully Protected Species.  Legislative and regulatory efforts  
            to protect fish and wildlife began long before the enactment  
            of CESA in 1970.  Initial efforts date back to 1909, including  
            laws to protect nongame birds (1909) and sea otters (1913).  


            In 1957, efforts to identify and provide additional protection  
            for rare animals or animals facing possible extinction  
            resulted in lists identifying fish, mammals, amphibians, birds  
            and reptiles. Statutes were enacted to prohibit any take of  
            the identified species.


            Unlike species that are listed as threatened or endangered  
          under CESA, the fully protected species law does not allow for  
          incidental or accidental take nor does it provide for  
          mitigation. Fully Protected species may not be taken or  
          possessed at any time, and no licenses or permits may be issued  
          for their take except for scientific research or the relocation  
          of bird species for the protection of livestock.










                                                                    AB 1845


                                                                    Page  4





            Although most fully protected species have also been listed as  
          threatened or endangered                                     
          species under the more recent, science-based endangered species  
          laws, lawful take and                                        
          mitigation provisions do not apply.

          4)Prior and related legislation: AB 353 (Lackey), Chapter 620,  
            Statutes of 2015, authorized DFW to allow the take of a fully  
            protected fish species known as the unarmored threespine  
            stickleback for a habitat restoration project on Bouquet  
            Creek.


            AB 1973 (Olsen), Chapter 121, Statutes of 2012, authorized DFW  
            to allow incidental take of the limestone salamander, a fully  
            protected amphibian species for a highway restoration project  
            in Mariposa County. 


            This year, both AB 2001 (Mathis) and AB 2488 (Dababneh),  
            authorize the take of a fully protected species. AB 2001  
            authorizes the take of a fully protected fish for scientific  
            research or for recovery efforts. AB 2488 authorizes DFW to  
            allow incidental take of the unarmored threespine stickleback  
            to continue operations of the Foothill Feeder water supply  
            facility in southern California.  Both bills are pending in  
            the Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee.


            In order to allow essential projects to move forward, as well  
            as provide for species protection and recovery, the  
            Legislature may wish to consider adopting a comprehensive,  
            science-based approach for fully protected species within the  
            provisions of CESA.













                                                                    AB 1845


                                                                    Page  5





          Analysis Prepared by:Jennifer Galehouse / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081