BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 1872


                                                                    Page  1


          Date of Hearing:  March 15, 2016
          Chief Counsel:     Gregory Pagan


                         ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY


                       Reginald Byron Jones-Sawyer, Sr., Chair





          AB  
                         1872 (Gray) - As Amended  March 8, 2016



          
          SUMMARY:  Makes deputy sheriffs employed by the county of Merced  
          assigned to perform custodial duties peace officers while  
          engaged in the performance of the duties of their employment,  
          and appropriates $1,315,000 from the General Fund to be  
          allocated to the University of California (UC), Merced for the  
          purpose of purchasing public safety equipment. Specifically,  
          this bill:
          1)Adds the County of Merced to the list of specified counties  
            within which deputy sheriffs assigned to perform duties  
            exclusively or initially relating to custodial assignments  
            with responsibility for operating a county custodial facility  
            are peace officers whose authority extends to any place in the  
            state while engaged in the performance of the duties of his or  
            her respective employment.

          2)Appropriates one million three hundred and fifteen thousand  
            dollars ($1,315,000) from the General Fund to the Regents of  
            UC, for allocation to UC, Merced, for the following public  
            safety purposes:



             a)   Forty thousand dollars ($40,000) for two mobile traffic  








                                                                    AB 1872


                                                                    Page  2


               message boards;

             b)   Three thousand dollars ($3,000) for two fire area of  
               refuge consoles;



             c)   Eighteen thousand dollars ($18,000) for fire  
               extinguisher training equipment;



             d)   Twenty-four thousand dollars ($24,000) for three fixed  
               license plate recognition (LPR) camera systems;



             e)   One hundred forty thousand dollars ($140,000) for 40  
               EvacuChairs;



             f)   Fifty-two thousand dollars ($52,000) for 40 automated  
               external defibrillators with training equipment;



             g)   Four hundred twenty thousand dollars ($420,000) for a  
               mobile incident management vehicle and equipment;



             h)   One hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) for a  
               mobile use of force options system;



             i)   Thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) for six mobile  
               computers with service;











                                                                    AB 1872


                                                                    Page  3


             j)   Forty-two thousand dollars ($42,000) for six in-car  
               video systems;



             aa)  Ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for two vehicle mounted  
               LPR camera systems;



             bb)  Fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) for one Cellebrite  
               system;



             cc)  Seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) for one crime  
               scene mapping system;



             dd)  Sixty thousand dollars ($60,000) for three portable  
               wireless camera systems;



             ee)  Thirty-six thousand dollars ($36,000) for 360 crowd  
               control barriers;  and, 



             ff)  Two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) for safety  
               improvements to an energy dissipator on Fairfield Canal.


          EXISTING LAW:  

          1)Provides that any deputy sheriff of the Counties of Los  
            Angeles, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, Glenn, Humboldt, Imperial,  
            Inyo, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Mariposa,  Mendocino, Plumas,  
            Riverside, San Benito, San Diego, San Luis Obispo, Santa  
            Barbara, Santa Clara, Shasta, Siskiyou, Solano, Sonoma,  
            Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Tulare, Tuolumne, and  








                                                                    AB 1872


                                                                    Page  4


            Yuba who is employed to perform duties exclusively or  
            initially relating to custodial assignments with  
            responsibilities for maintaining the operations of county  
            custodial facilities, including the custody, care,  
            supervision, security, movement, and transportation of  
            inmates, is a peace officer whose authority extends to any  
            place in California only while engaged in the performance of  
            the duties of his or her respective employment and for the  
            purpose of carrying out the primary function of employment  
            relating to custodial assignments or when performing other law  
            enforcement duties directed by his or her employing agency  
            during a local state of emergency.  (Pen. Code, §830.1, subd.  
            (c).)

          2)Provides that all cities and counties are authorized to employ  
            custodial officers who are public officers but not peace  
            officers for the purpose of maintaining order in local  
            detention facilities.  Custodial officers under this section  
            do not have the right to carry or possess firearms in the  
            performance of his or her duties.  However, custodial officers  
            may use reasonable force to establish and maintain custody and  
            may make arrests for misdemeanors and felonies pursuant to a  
            warrant.  (Pen. Code, § 831.)

          3)Provides that notwithstanding existing law, law enforcement  
            agencies in counties with a population of 425,000 or less and  
            the Counties of San Diego, Fresno, Kern, Riverside, Santa  
            Clara, and Stanislaus may employ custodial officers with  
            enhanced powers.  The enhanced powers custodial officers are  
            empowered to serve warrants, writs, or subpoenas within the  
            custodial facility and, as with regular custodial officers,  
            use reasonable force to establish and maintain custody.  (Pen.  
            Code § 831.5, subd. (a).

          4)Provides that prior to the exercise of peace officer powers,  
            every peace officer shall have satisfactorily completed the  
            Commission on Peace Officers Standards and Training (POST)  
            course.  (Pen. Code § 832, subd. (b).)












                                                                    AB 1872


                                                                    Page  5


          5)Provides that the enhanced powers custodial officers may carry  
            firearms under the direction of the sheriff while fulfilling  
            specified job-related duties such as while assigned as a court  
            bailiff, transporting prisoners, guarding hospitalized  
            prisoners, or suppressing jail riots, escapes, or rescues.   
            (Pen. Code § 831.5, subd. (b).)

          6)Provides that enhanced powers custodial officers may also make  
            warrantless arrests within the facility.  (Pen. Code, §831.5,  
            subd. (f).)

          7)Provides that every peace officer shall satisfactorily  
            complete an introductory course of training prescribed by POST  
            and that, after July 1, 1989, satisfactory completion of the  
            course shall be demonstrated by passage of an appropriate  
            examination developed or approved by POST.  (Pen. Code § 832,  
            subd. (a).)

          8)Provides that prior to the exercise of peace officer powers,  
            every peace officer shall have satisfactorily completed the  
            POST course.  (Pen. Code, § 832, subd. (b).)

          9)Provides that a person shall not have the powers of a peace  
            officer until he or she has satisfactorily completed the POST  
            course.  (Pen. Code, § 832, subd. (c).)

          10)   Provides that any person completing the POST training who  
            does not become employed as a peace officer within three years  
            from the date of passing the examination, or who has a  
            three-year or longer break in service as a peace officer,  
            shall pass the examination prior to the exercise of powers as  
            a peace officer, except as specified.   (Pen. Code, § 832,  
            subd. (e)(1).)

          FISCAL EFFECT:  Unknown

          COMMENTS:  

          1)Author's Statement:  According to the author, "According to  
            the California Department of Justice's 2014 homicide  
            statistics, Merced County has the highest homicide rate in the  
            state among counties with populations of 100,000 or more. The  








                                                                    AB 1872


                                                                    Page  6


            Merced County Sheriff's Office and local police departments  
            continue to have difficulties filling deputy sheriff and  
            police officer vacancies. For example, Merced County currently  
            has 21 deputy sheriff vacancies and continues to experience  
            double digit unemployment and significantly higher poverty  
            rates than the rest of the state. AB 1872 will help Merced  
            County maximize its existing law enforcement resources and  
            join the 32 other counties in California that currently have  
            this status. 

          "Also, this bill appropriates $1,315,000 to UC Merced for  
            purposes of purchasing public safety equipment. During the  
            initial growth of the UC Merced campus, some areas related to  
            safety were under-resourced and do not presently have the  
            safety equipment of the sister UC campuses in the police and  
            fire areas. Although the November 4, 2015 incident on the UC  
            Merced campus was handled in a professional manner by the  
            responding UC Merced Police Officers, it caused the Assistant  
            Vice Chancellor for Campus and Public Safety to conduct a  
            review of safety equipment available to police and fire during  
            and after an emergency situation or major event. After  
            consultation with other UC Chiefs of Police and first  
            responder partners, a list of equipment was developed which  
            would benefit not only the UC Merced campus, but also the  
            larger Merced city and county region."

          2)Argument in Support:  The Merced County Law Enforcement  
            Chief's Association states, "The Merced County Sheriff's  
            Office and local police departments continue to have  
            difficulty in filling deputy sheriff and police officer  
            vacancies.  This legislation is necessary to relieve  
            significant staffing issues.  The following are examples of  
            how this legislation will benefit the Merced County Sheriff's  
            Office:

          "Correctional staff can be deployed to positions requiring peace  
            officer powers during a local state of emergency.  In past  
            emergencies, correctional officers were unable to assist in  
            the field.  During an emergency such as a flood, major fire,  
            or mass casualty event, the use of correctional officers could  
            provide the sheriff's office more flexibility and assistance  
            for field deputies.  An example would be the recent event at  








                                                                    AB 1872


                                                                    Page  7


            U.C. Merced. Correctional staff could have handled traffic  
            control freeing up deputies for other duties.

          "Correctional staff conduct exterior security perimeter checks  
            of jail facilities. Their authority to detain or arrest a  
            violator outside of the jail is limited to that of any other  
            citizen. If these employees had peace officer status, they  
            could detain and potentially arrest offenders.

          "On a routine basis, people will arrive at the jail lobby to  
            surrender themselves on an outstanding warrant. The law does  
            not allow non-peace officers to make warrant arrests outside  
            the jail. Consequently, if there are no peace officers in the  
            building, one must be called in from patrol in order to make  
            an arrest.

          "Penal Code 831.5(D) states any time there are 20 or more  
            correctional officers on duty, there shall be one peace  
            officer on duty to supervise the performance of the  
            correctional officers.  Future jail consolidation and  
            expansion plans at the John Latorroca Correctional Center  
            could exceed this staffing number and Penal Code 830.1(c)  
            would remedy this issue.

          "Correctional staff could be utilized in criminal courtrooms  
            allowing deputies to be utilized for patrol duties."

          3)Prior Legislation:

             a)   SB 1254(La Malfa), Chapter 66, Statutes of 2012, added  
               Trinity and Yuba Counties to the list of specified counties  
               within which deputy sheriffs assigned to perform duties  
               exclusively or initially related to custodial assignments  
               are peace officers whose authority extends to any place in  
               the state while engaged in the duties of his or her  
               respective employment .

             b)   AB 1695(Bell), Chapter 575, Statutes of 2010, allowed  
               the duties of custodial officers employed by the Santa  
               Clara County Department of Corrections to be performed at  
               other health care facilities in Santa Clara County, in  
               addition to their duties performed at the Santa Clara  








                                                                    AB 1872


                                                                    Page  8


               Valley Medical Center.

             c)   AB 2215 (Berryhill), Chapter 15, Statutes of 2008, added  
               Calaveras, Lake, Mariposa, and San Benito Counties to the  
               list of specified counties within which deputy sheriffs  
               assigned to perform duties exclusively or initially related  
               to custodial assignments are peace officers whose authority  
               extends to any place in the state while engaged in the  
               duties of his or her respective employment .

             d)   AB 151 (Beryhill), Chapter 84, Statutes of 2007, added  
               Glenn, Lassen, and Stanislaus to the list of specified  
               counties within which deputy sheriffs assigned to perform  
               duties exclusively or initially related to custodial  
               assignments are peace officers whose authority extends to  
               any place in the state while engaged in the duties of his  
               or her respective employment .

          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:

          Support

          Merced County Sheriff's Office
          Merced County Law Enforcement Chief's Association
          Merced County Law Enforcement Sergeant's Association

          Opposition

          None

          Analysis Prepared  
          by:              Gregory Pagan / PUB. S. / (916) 319-3744


















                                                                    AB 1872


                                                                    Page  9