BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 1879 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 12, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY Mark Stone, Chair AB 1879 (McCarty) - As Amended March 28, 2016 PROPOSED CONSENT (As Proposed to be Amended) SUBJECT: Foster youth: permanency KEY ISSUE: IN ORDER TO HELP FOSTER YOUTH FIND PERMANENT FAMILIES TO LOVE AND SUPPORT THEM, SHOULD SPECIALIZED, CHILD-CENTERED PERMANENCY SERVICES BE REQUIRED FOR YOUTH WHO MIGHT OTHERWISE AGE OUT OF LONG-TERM FOSTER CARE WITHOUT A FAMILY AND WITHOUT EVEN A CONNECTION TO A SUPPORTIVE ADULT? SYNOPSIS California's child welfare system is responsible for ensuring the protection and safety of children at risk of abuse, neglect or abandonment. When it is necessary for the state to remove a child from his or her parents, the primary objective of the child welfare system is to safely reunify the child with his or her family. If reunification is not an option or later fails, another permanent arrangement is sought for the child, which can include adoption, guardianship or, historically, long-term foster care, today called "another planned permanent living arrangement" or APPLA. However, the outcomes for children in AB 1879 Page 2 long-term foster care or APPLA who end up emancipating from foster care without the support of a loving family are notoriously poor. According to the author, within two years of leaving the foster care system, 50 percent are homeless, victimized, incarcerated or dead. Even with extended foster care until 21, the odds are stacked against youth who remain in the foster care system for years and then age out without a strong connection to a loving, supportive family. This bill, sponsored by Families Now and supported by a broad range of child welfare organizations and children's advocates, seeks to improve those odds by requiring special efforts to find permanent families for these youth by requiring that (1) child-centered specialized permanency services be provided for children at risk of long-term foster care and (2) that potential adoptive families and guardians be provided with information to support their hopefully long-term relationship with the foster child. The author states that these highly effective child-centered specialized permanency practices will help provide permanency, love and support for children most likely to age-out of foster care without the safety net of a family: "There is no question that this bill will result in more of our children achieving the permanent families they need and deserve." There is no reported opposition. SUMMARY: Requires that child-centered specialized permanency services be provided to specified foster youth in order to facilitate the placement of these youth with permanent families. Specifically, this bill: 1)Defines "child-centered specialized permanency services" to mean services designed for, and with, a child to: a) Address the child's history of trauma, separation and loss; AB 1879 Page 3 b) Include mental health services or other services, as specified, that are needed to ameliorate impairments in significant areas of life functioning that may reduce the likelihood of the child achieving a permanent family; c) Utilize enhanced family finding and engagement to assist the child in achieving a permanent family through reunification, adoption, legal guardianship or other lifelong connections to caring adults, as specified; d) Prepare the permanent family to meet the child's needs, set appropriate expectations for before and after permanency; and e) Stabilize the placement. 2)Requires a court, when it has determined that it is not in the best interests of a child to hold a hearing to terminate parental rights, to order the provision of child-centered specialized permanency services for: a) A child who is not placed with a fit and willing relative; b) A child 16 years or age or older for whom the court has ordered placement in an "another planned permanent living arrangement" ("APPLA," i.e., long-term foster care); c) A child placed in a residential treatment facility for whom the court has determined that adoption is currently unlikely or undesirable; d) A child that the court has determined to have a AB 1879 Page 4 probability for adoption but is determined difficult to place, as specified; and e) A child for whom an available and suitable legal guardian has not yet been found, as specified. 3)Permits a court to order the provision of child-centered specialized permanency services for a nonminor dependent for whom the court has ordered placement in long-term foster care. 4)Requires a court in some cases and permits it in others, when it has determined that it is not in the best interests of the child to hold a hearing to terminate parental rights and when it has ordered a child 16 years of age or older or a nonminor dependent to be placed in long-term foster care, to order that the appropriateness of the child's continuation in long-term foster care be assessed at the next review hearing, as specified. 5)Includes child-centered specialized permanency services among the efforts a child welfare agency or probation department must show the court it has made in an attempt to achieve permanency for the child or nonminor dependent when the court is reviewing the status of a dependent child or nonminor dependent or ward of the juvenile court, as specified. 6)Requires a court, at hearings reviewing the status of a dependent child, as specified, to assess progress towards placement in a permanent family for a child placed in a residential treatment facility when the court has determined that adoption is currently unlikely or undesirable for that child and that it is not in the best interests of the child to hold a hearing to terminate parental rights. AB 1879 Page 5 7)Stipulates that permanent placement services, designed to provide an alternate permanent family structure for children who because of abuse, neglect or exploitation cannot safely remain at home and who are unlikely to ever return home, shall, as needed to achieve a permanent family, include child-centered specialized permanency services. Further, permits permanent placement services for nonminor dependents to include child-centered specialized permanency services and requires permanent placement services for nonminor dependents to include supportive transition services. 8)Requires information regarding, and documentation of the provision of, child-centered specialized permanency services to be included in a youth's case-planning processes, as specified. 9)Requires a social worker or probation officer, when the court has ordered a dependent child or a ward of the juvenile court placed for adoption or has appointed a relative or nonrelative legal guardian, to provide the prospective adoptive family or guardian written information regarding the importance of working with mental health providers that have specialized adoption or permanency clinical training and experience if the family needs clinical support, and a description of the desirable clinical expertise the family should look for when choosing an adoption- or permanency-competent mental health professional. 10)Makes various legislative findings and states the intent of the Legislature to improve permanency outcomes and stability for older foster youth by improving the stability of adoptive and guardianship families and requiring child-centered, specialized permanency services for children whose reunification services have been terminated, who are not placed with a fit and willing relative, and who are considered AB 1879 Page 6 unlikely to achieve a permanent family. EXISTING LAW: 1)Provides that a juvenile court has jurisdiction over a child who is subject to abuse or neglect. (Welfare and Institutions Code Section 300. Unless stated otherwise, all further statutory references are to that code.) 2)States that the purpose of dependency law is to provide maximum safety and protection for children who are currently being physically, sexually, or emotionally abused, neglected, or exploited, and to ensure the safety, protection, and physical and emotional well-being of children who are at risk of harm. (Section 300.2.) 3)Declares the intent of the Legislature to, whenever possible, preserve and strengthen a child's family ties and, when a child must be removed from the physical custody of his or her parents, to give preferential consideration to placement with relatives. States the intent of the Legislature to reaffirm its commitment to children who are in out-of-home placement to live in the least restrictive family setting and as close to the child's family as possible, as specified. Further states the intent of the Legislature that all children live with a committed, permanent, nurturing family and states that services and supports should be tailored to meet the specific needs of the individual child and family being served, as specified. (Section 16000.) 4)Requires out-of-home placement of a child in foster care to be based upon selection of a safe setting that is the least restrictive family setting that promotes normal childhood experiences and the most appropriate setting that meets the AB 1879 Page 7 child's individual needs, as specified. Further requires the selection of placement to consider, in order of priority, placement with: relatives, nonrelated extended family members, and tribal members; foster family homes, resource families, and nontreatment certified homes of foster family agencies; followed by treatment and intensive treatment certified homes of foster family agencies or multidimensional treatment foster care homes or therapeutic foster care homes; group care placements in the order of short-term residential treatment centers, group homes, community treatment facilities, and out-of-state residential treatment, as specified. (Section 16501.1 (d)(1).) 5)Establishes requirements and processes for the court, and further provides for various hearings to review the status of the dependent child during which certain case information regarding the child must be provided and reviewed, including hearings to terminate parental rights and establish alternative permanent arrangements for the child, including long-term foster care. (Sections 360-370.) 6)Defines "nonminor dependent" as a current or former foster youth who is between 18 and 21 years old, in foster care under the responsibility of the county welfare department, county probation department, or Indian Tribe, and participating in a transitional independent living plan, as specified. (Section 11400 (v).) 7)Establishes in federal law the Preventing Sex Trafficking and Strengthening Families Act, which includes new requirements for states and counties regarding sex trafficking prevention and reporting, data collection, reasonable and prudent parent standards, adoption incentives payments, successor guardianship, and successful adulthood. (Public Law 113-183.) AB 1879 Page 8 8)Defines a "planned permanent living arrangement" to mean any permanent living arrangement that is ordered by the court for a minor 16 years of age or older when there is a compelling reason or reasons to determine that it is not in the best interest of the minor to have a permanent plan, as specified. States that a planned permanent living arrangement can include, but not be limited to, placement in a specific, identified foster family home, program or facility on a permanent basis or placement in a transitional housing placement facility. Further, permits a court to place a minor in a planned permanent living arrangement only if the court finds that there is a compelling reason, as specified, for determining that terminating parental rights and adoption are not in the best interest of the minor. (Section 727.3.) FISCAL EFFECT: As currently in print this bill is keyed fiscal. COMMENTS: California's child welfare system is responsible for ensuring the protection and safety of children at risk of abuse, neglect or abandonment. When it is necessary for the state to remove a child from his or her parents, the primary objective of the child welfare system is to safely reunify the child with his or her family. If reunification is not an option or later fails, another permanent arrangement is sought for the child, which can include adoption, guardianship or, historically, long-term foster care or today "another planned permanent living arrangement" or APPLA. Of the 66,000 children living in foster care in California, nearly 40 percent have been in care for over two years, 25 percent have been in care for over three years and almost 15 percent have been in care for over five years. The outcomes for children in long-term foster care or APPLA who end up emancipating from foster care without the support of a loving family are notoriously poor. According to the author, within two years of leaving the foster care system, 50 percent are homeless, victimized, incarcerated or dead. Even with extended foster care until 21, the odds are stacked against children who AB 1879 Page 9 remain in the foster care system for years and then age out without a strong connection to a loving, supportive family. This bill seeks to improve those odds by requiring special efforts to find permanent families for children in the foster care system by requiring that child-centered specialized permanency services be provided for children at risk of long-term foster care and requiring that potential adoptive families and guardians be provided with information to support their hopefully long-term relationship with the foster child. The author best explains the need for the bill, as well as the bill itself: Far too many California foster children needlessly grow up in a succession of foster care placements and age-out of care without a safe and committed family to face dire outcomes. Within two years 50% are homeless, victimized, incarcerated or dead. . . . Keeping children in foster care for extended periods of time creates unnecessarily high costs, both fiscally and in human terms. We can do better for our children. We know how to achieve permanent families for these children. In fact, for more than a decade California has provided leadership to the nation in establishing highly-effective child-centered specialized permanency practices. Children receiving these services, including those considered most-likely to age-out of foster care without the safety net of a permanent family are achieving permanent families. These services have also been documented to be highly cost-effective, resulting in short-term county savings in excess of the cost of providing services, as well as long-term savings at all levels of government. Unfortunately, these services are provided sparingly, or not at all by most California counties resulting in children needlessly languishing in foster care. . . . . AB 1879 Page 10 We know how to find them permanent families, and we know that after a start-up period the services pay for themselves. This bill creates a statutory definition of child-centered specialized permanency services designed to address the child's history of separation and loss, and requires that these services be provided to children whose reunification services have been terminated, are not placed with a fit and willing relative, and are considered unlikely to achieve a permanent family. It also requires that the services be included in the statutory requirements to provide intensive and ongoing efforts to place long-term foster care youth age 16 and above into a permanent family. There is no question that this bill will result in more of our children achieving the permanent families they need and deserve. Placement into a permanent home is not a panacea. These come into adoptive families with tragic histories of trauma, separation and loss, their new parents often need to seek the help of mental health providers who understand the specialized clinical issues associated with adoption and other forms of permanency. Clinical services provided by mental health providers without specialized training and experience in adoption/ permanency clinical issues has been shown to often do more harm than good, putting the children at risk for disruption of the adoption? one more preventable loss in a litany of losses they have incurred. AB 1879 requires that potential adoptive parents and guardians be informed of the importance of working with mental health providers with the necessary specialized training and experience. This bill builds on state and federal legislation to improve the lives of foster children and provide them with a hopeful future. Recent state and federal legislation has sought to improve the lives of children who might otherwise spent their youth in foster care, often in groups homes, and emancipate without any connection to a supportive adult. First, the 2014 federal AB 1879 Page 11 Preventing Sex Trafficking, and Strengthening Families Act made numerous changes to the foster care program and enacted new requirements regarding sex trafficking prevention and reporting, data collection, reasonable and prudent parent standards, adoption incentives payments, successor guardianship, and successful adulthood in order to help protect youth and provide them with permanent families. Conforming state legislation (SB 794 (Senate Committee on Human Services), Chap. 425, Stats. 2015), eliminated the option of long-term foster care placement or APPLA for dependent children under the age of 16, and required permanency review hearing documents for children who are 16 years of age or older and in an APPLA to include a description of the intensive and ongoing efforts of the child welfare agency to return the child to the home of the parent, place the child for adoption, or establish a legal guardianship, as appropriate. Child welfare agencies are required, in these documents, to describe any barriers to achieving the permanent plan and the efforts made by the child welfare agency to address those barriers. Courts must then review that progress. In order to help foster children heal from the trauma and abuse they have suffered, last year's AB 403 (Stone), Chap. 773, Stats. 2015, established a comprehensive reform effort to make sure that foster youth have their day-to-day physical, mental, and emotional needs met; that they have the greatest chance to grow up in permanent and supportive homes; and that they have the opportunity to grow into self-sufficient, successful adults by transitioning children away from congregate care into home-based family care with resource families. In addition to new services and supports for resource families, AB 403 established targeted training and support that can better prepare families to help care for foster youth. This bill adds tools to help ensure that children leave foster care with lifelong support. This bill seeks to build on the federal and state legislative advances and help foster youth who might otherwise emancipate from foster care without family and AB 1879 Page 12 without support by making every effort to find permanent families for these youth and, once that family is found, to help make that relationship more stable and more successful. This bill creates a statutory definition of child-centered specialized permanency services designed to address the child's history of separation and loss, and requires that these services be provided to children who are not placed with a fit and willing relative, and are considered unlikely to achieve a permanent family. To help the child be ready for a permanent family, these child-centered services include services to address the child's history of trauma, separation and loss, including mental health services needed to ameliorate impairments in life functioning that may reduce the likelihood of the child achieving a permanent family. The bill also requires that the services be included in the statutory requirements to provide intensive and ongoing efforts to place long-term foster care youth age 16 and above into a permanent family. In addition, the bill permits, but does not require, the court to order these services for a nonminor dependent. To help find willing and able families, the bill requires enhanced family finding and engagement to search for relatives, using search technology and social media to locate possible family members. This list of efforts required as part of child-centered specialized permanency services is neither new nor revolutionary. These are best practices that have developed in California and across the nation over years of helping foster youth heal from the trauma they have experienced and find permanency. Many of these services are already mandated in certain instances. What is new is the clear and concise summary, in no uncertain terms, of what is required to help find loving and permanent families for foster youth and its application to all youth in the foster care system, as provided. Lastly, in an effort to support those permanent placements, once found, and make sure that they can indeed remain permanent, this AB 1879 Page 13 bill requires that the social worker or probation officer, when the court has ordered a dependent child or a ward placed for adoption or has appointed a relative or nonrelative legal guardian, to provide the prospective adoptive family or guardian written information, if the family needs clinical support, regarding the importance of working with mental health providers that have specialized adoption or permanency clinical training and experience, and a description of the desirable clinical expertise the family should look for when choosing an adoption- or permanency-competent mental health professional. Author's Technical Amendments: In order to ensure that these important new permanency services are required in all appropriate cases and properly reviewed, the author rightly asks that the bill be amended in three places to ensure that if a court orders a youth 16 or over into an APPLA, the court must require that child-centered specialized permanency services be provided and that the court review what was provided at the next hearing. This change is accomplished by the following three amendments: On page 30, line 10, after the comma, inset: if such a permanent plan is ordered shall On page 42, line 29, after "and", insert: if such a permanent plan is ordered shall On page 51, line 37, after "and", insert: if such a permanent plan is ordered shall ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: Supporters write that this bill will "significantly reduce the number of youth aging out of foster care without a safe, committed family. It will also improve the stability of those families. It is time for California to make AB 1879 Page 14 child-centered specialized permanency services available to all waiting children. . . . When we remove a child from their biological family we make an implicit promise to give them something better. Approximately 4,000 youth age-out of foster care each year. Aging-out without a safe and stable permanent family is not 'something better.' Within two years, 50% are homeless, victimized, incarcerated or dead. We can do better. Model programs in California and across the nation have demonstrated that when given these services, even children and youth considered the least-likely to achieve permanency, now achieve the committed permanent family they need and deserve." REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: Support Families Now (sponsor) Advokids Alliance for Children's Rights Alternative Family Services Bienvenidos Children's Center California Alliance of Child and Family Services AB 1879 Page 15 California CASA Association California Youth Connection Children Now Children's Advocacy Institute Children's Law Center of California County Welfare Directors Association of California David and Margaret Youth and Family Services Family Law Section of the State Bar John Burton Foundation Kinship Center Lilliput Children's Services North Star Family Center Nuevo Amanecer Latino Children's Services AB 1879 Page 16 Sierra Vista Child & Family Services Youth Homes Opposition None on file Analysis Prepared by:Leora Gershenzon / JUD. / (916) 319-2334