BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 1887 Page 1 CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS AB 1887 (Low) As Amended August 15, 2016 Majority vote -------------------------------------------------------------------- |ASSEMBLY: |54-21 | (May 9, 2016) |SENATE: |26-12 |(August 17, | | | | | | |2016) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | -------------------------------------------------------------------- Original Committee Reference: JUD. SUMMARY: Prohibits a state agency and the Legislature from requiring its employees to travel to states that discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expressions, or approving state-funded travel to such states, except as provided. Specifically, this bill: 1)Prohibits any state agency, department, board, authority, or commission, including an agency, department, board, authority, or commission of the University of California (UC) or the California State University (CSU), from doing either of the following: a) Require any of its employees, officers, or members to travel to a state that, after June 26, 2015, has enacted a AB 1887 Page 2 law that voids or repeals, or has the effect of voiding or repealing, existing state or local protections against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression or has enacted a law that authorizes or requires discrimination against same-sex couples or their families or on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression, including any law that creates an exemption to antidiscrimination laws in order to permit discrimination against same-sex couples or their families or on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. b) Approve a request for state-funded or state-sponsored travel to a state that, after June 26, 2015, has enacted a law that voids or repeals, or has the effect of voiding or repealing, existing state or local protections against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression, or has enacted a law that authorizes or requires discrimination against same-sex couples or their families or on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression, including any law that creates an exemption to antidiscrimination laws in order to permit discrimination against same-sex couples or their families or on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. 2)Specifies that the prohibition created by this bill does not apply to travel that is required for any of the following purposes: a) Enforcement of California law, including auditing and revenue collection. b) Litigation. c) To meet contractual obligations incurred before January 1, 2017. AB 1887 Page 3 d) To comply with requests by the federal government to appear before committees. e) To participate in meetings or training required by a grant or required to maintain grant funding. f) To complete job-required training necessary to maintain licensure or similar standards required for holding a position, in the event that comparable training cannot be obtained in California or a different state not affected by subdivision (b). g) For the protection of public health, welfare, or safety, as determined by the affected agency, department, board, authority, or commission, or by the affected legislative office, as described in subdivision (b). 3)Requires the California Attorney General to develop, maintain, and post on his or her Internet Web site a current list of states that, after June 26, 2015, have enacted a law that voids or repeals, or has the effect of voiding or repealing, existing state or local protections against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression or has enacted a law that authorizes or requires discrimination against same-sex couples or their families or on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression, including any law that creates an exemption to antidiscrimination laws in order to permit discrimination against same-sex couples or their families or on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. The Senate amendments: 1)Extend the application of the bill to the state Legislature. AB 1887 Page 4 2)Expand the types of travel exempted from the bill's provisions and clarify the affected agency shall determine whether the travel is necessary for the public health, welfare, or safety. EXISTING LAW: 1)Provides that any state officer or employee of any state agency may confer with other persons, associations, or organizations outside of the state wherever it may be of assistance in the conduct of state business. Permits, to the extent that funds are authorized and available, reimbursement for actual and necessary expenses for travel outside of the state as authorized. Specifies that this section does not apply to legislators or their staff. (Government Code Section 11032.) 2)Provides, under the Unruh Civil Rights Act, that all persons within this state are free and equal, and no matter what their sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sexual orientation, citizenship, primary language, or immigration status, are entitled to the full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, or services of all business establishments of every kind whatsoever. Defines "sex" to include gender identity and gender expression. (Civil Code Section 51.) FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8, negligible state costs. COMMENTS: According to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCLS) Web site, as of late 2015, 21 states had enacted some form of Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), at least some of which were passed in response to recent court cases recognizing same-sex marriage or other rights affecting AB 1887 Page 5 the LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender) community. For example, North Carolina recently enacted an anti-discrimination measure that pre-empts any local anti-discrimination ordinance; because some of the local ordinances bar discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, while the state law does not, the impact of the law is to overturn local measures enacted to protect LGBT rights. The author and sponsors believe that such laws and inconsistent are inconsistent with California values, and that the state should make a statement against such laws by refusing to require or fund employee travel to such states. California Anti-Discrimination Laws: California's two most significant anti-discrimination laws - the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civil Code Section 51) and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Government Code Sections 12900-12996) - prohibit discrimination on a number of grounds, including most significantly for purposes of this bill, sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression. According to the author and sponsors, California has been a leader in protecting the civil rights of, and preventing discrimination against, the LGBT community. California's Unruh Civil Rights Act, for example, prohibits all business establishments "of any kind whatsoever" from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression. The author and sponsors believe it would be inappropriate, given the values expressed in our laws, to allow state funds to support states with discriminatory laws. As a step in this direction, therefore, this bill would prohibit state agencies from requiring employees to travel to states that discriminate against the LGBT community, as defined. Specifically, this bill would prevent any state agency or the Legislature from requiring any of its employees or officers to travel to a state with discriminatory laws, or from approving any state funding for travel to such states. For purposes of this bill, required travel or travel-funding would prohibited to any state that, after June 26, 2015, has enacted a law that voids or repeals, or has the effect of voiding or repealing, existing state or local protections against discrimination on AB 1887 Page 6 the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression or has enacted a law that authorizes or requires discrimination against same-sex couples or their families or on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression, including any law that creates an exemption to antidiscrimination laws in order to permit discrimination against same-sex couples or their families or on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. In addition, the bill would require the Attorney General to develop, maintain, and post on his or her Internet website a current list of states that have enacted such laws. The purpose of the bill is apparently twofold: 1) to prevent a state agency or legislative office from compelling an employee to travel to an environment in which he or she may feel uncomfortable; and 2) to prevent the use of state funds to benefit a state that does not adequately protect the civil rights of certain classes of people. However, the bill would not apply to any travel that is necessary for purposes of law enforcement or litigation; to meet prior contractual obligations; to meet specified training or grant obligations; or to protect public health, welfare, or safety, as determined by the affected agency or legislative office. Analysis Prepared by: Thomas Clark / JUD. / (916) 319-2334 FN: 0004285