AB 1889,
as amended, Mullin. begin deleteTransportation funding: CalTrain. end deletebegin insertPeninsula Rail Transit District.end insert
Existing law, operative under certain conditions, redesignates the Peninsula Corridor Study Joint Powers Board as the Peninsula Rail Transit District, comprised of 9 members appointed from various governing bodies situated in the City and County of San Francisco and the Counties of San Mateo and Santa Clara, with specified powers.
end insertbegin insertThis bill would repeal obsolete provisions relating to the Peninsula Rail Transit District.
end insertExisting law provides for the creation of the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board, which operates CalTrain as the commuter rail service along the San Francisco Peninsula commute corridor.
end deleteThis bill would declare the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation to provide the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board with the necessary tools to explore options that will help CalTrain obtain a dedicated source of funding.
end deleteVote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
begin insertDivision 16 (commencing with Section 160000)
2of the end insertbegin insertPublic Utilities Codeend insertbegin insert is repealed.end insert
The Legislature finds and declares all of the
4following:
5(a) CalTrain is the only transit system in the San Francisco Bay
6area without a permanent, dedicated source of funding. Other
7agencies rely on money from sales taxes, property taxes, state
8funding, and other sources.
9(b) As a result of not having a dedicated source of funding,
10CalTrain has been wrestling with a continuing fiscal crisis - a
11budget that starts out short of funds every year.
12(c) For the last several years, ____ percent of CalTrain’s annual
13operating budget has been covered by passenger fares, parking
14fees, and other revenues. Annual
contributions from the three
15partners in the CalTrain system have been in the range of 40
16percent.
17(d) With a dedicated source of funding, CalTrain could more
18readily meet the demands of more than 60,000 daily riders that
19depend on CalTrain to get from their homes to some of the nation’s
20most high-profile companies in San Francisco and Silicon Valley.
21(e) The ability of the region’s infrastructure to keep pace with
22job and population growth continues to be one of the biggest
23barriers to sustained economic growth and competitiveness in the
24San Francisco Bay area. By providing a reliable daily commute
25alternative for residents and employees avoiding the congested
26Interstate 280 and 101 corridors, CalTrain has become one of the
27San Francisco Bay area’s fastest growing transit systems.
28(f) Dedicated funding will support
CalTrain’s ability to remain
29the transit backbone of the San Francisco Peninsula commute
30corridor and better serve the needs of the region.
31(g) CalTrain is managed by a Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers
32Board (JPB) that consists of a partnership between the San Mateo
33County Transit District (SamTrans), the Santa Clara Valley
34Transportation Authority (VTA), and the City and County of San
35Francisco through the San Francisco Municipal Transportation
36Agency (SFMTA).
It is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation
38to provide the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board with the
P3 1necessary tools to explore options obtain a dedicated source of
2funding.
O
98