BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 1894


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  April 13, 2016


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                               Lorena Gonzalez, Chair


          AB  
          1894 (Committee on Agriculture) - As Amended March 1, 2016


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Agriculture                    |Vote:|9 - 0        |
          |Committee:   |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  NoReimbursable:  No


          SUMMARY:


          This bill modifies the Citrus Program (CP) late payment process,  
          and clarifies subject areas of Dairy Marketing Branch (DMB)  
          educational and research efforts. In summary, this bill: 


          1)Changes the CP late payment date to be the last day of the  
            month following the month when the commodities were received  
            rather than the 10th day of the month following the assessment  








                                                                    AB 1894


                                                                    Page  2





            due date. 


          2)Clarifies that citrus handlers are responsible for the payment  
            of assessments and inspection fees associated with CP. 


          3)Defines, as it relates to milk and dairy products marketing,  
            educational and research activities to mean any effort to  
            develop and improve the management practices of dairy  
            producers and processors, including, but not limited to,  
            practices associated with the environmental sustainability of  
            land, air quality, and water quality.


          4)Allows CDFA to fund educational and research activities. 


          FISCAL EFFECT:


          1)The CP provisions would result in minor and absorbable costs  
            to the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) to  
            coordinate payment processes. 


          2)The DMB provisions would not result in any additional state  
            costs. 


          COMMENTS:


          1)Purpose and background on citrus provisions. Under existing  
            law, the CP and the Standardization Program (SP), which  
            establishes minimum standards for all fresh fruits, nuts, and  
            vegetables, have different dates when late penalty payments  
            begin accruing. Language governing the CP late payment  
            schedule is also ambiguous and has recently caused confusion.  








                                                                    AB 1894


                                                                    Page  3





            AB 1894 would bring the CP assessments and penalty payments in  
            line with the SP process. 


          2)Purpose and background on milk and dairy provisions. Existing  
            law authorizes the Dairy marketing Branch (DMB) of CDFA to  
            provide education and research activities for the dairy  
            industry. The broad interpretation of this statutory mandate  
            is that the CDFA may use this authority to fund environmental  
            research projects. However, the ambiguous nature of the  
            language does bring into question the legality of the  
            continued use of DMB funds for this purpose. 


          Analysis Prepared by:Luke Reidenbach / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081