BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 1905


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  April 4, 2016


                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES


                                 Das Williams, Chair


          AB 1905  
          (Wilk) - As Introduced February 11, 2016


          SUBJECT:  Natural gas injection and storage:  study (Urgency)


          SUMMARY:  Requires the Natural Resources Agency (NRA), on or  
          before July 1, 2017, to complete an independent scientific study  
          on natural gas injection and storage practices and facilities. 


          EXISTING LAW: 


          1)Establishes the Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources  
            (DOGGR) as the state's oil and gas regulator.



          2)Requires the state's Oil and Gas Supervisor (Supervisor) to  
            supervise the drilling, operation, maintenance, and  
            abandonment of wells, and the operation, maintenance, and  
            removal or abandonment of tanks and facilities attendant to  
            oil and gas production.
          3)Allows DOGGR to apply to the United States Environmental  
            Protection Agency (US EPA) to receive "primacy" to operate the  
            Class II Underground Injection Control (UIC) program for oil  
            and gas injection wells at the state level.  The US EPA  
            granted primacy and delegated authority to DOGGR to operate  








                                                                    AB 1905


                                                                    Page  2





            the UIC program in 1983.

          4)Requires the Supervisor to produce a public annual report  
            containing information about the state's oil and gas  
            production and other related materials.

          5)Requires NRA, on or before January 1, 2015, to complete an  
            independent scientific study on well stimulation treatments.
          


          THIS BILL:


          1)Requires NRA, on or before July 1, 2017, to complete an  
            independent scientific study on natural gas injection and  
            storage practices and facilities.


          2)Requires the independent scientific study to evaluate the  
            hazards and risks and potential hazards and risks that natural  
            gas injection and storage pose to natural resources and  
            public, occupational, and environmental health and safety.


          3)Requires the independent scientific study to do all of the  
            following:


             a)   Follow standard protocols of the scientific profession;


             b)   Identify and evaluate well construction standards and  
               operation techniques;


             c)   Determine the average age of injection wells at natural  
               gas storage facilities in the state and determine whether  
               the construction standards used in the aging wells are  








                                                                    AB 1905


                                                                    Page  3





               adequate to protect public and environmental health and  
               safety;


             d)   Identify the proximity of existing natural gas storage  
               facilities in the state to population centers and the risks  
               posed by those facilities to nearby populations;


             e)   Identify the chemicals currently used as odorants at  
               natural gas storage facilities in the state and the risk  
               they pose;


             f)   Evaluate potential alternatives to the odorants  
               currently used to determine if there are alternatives;


             g)   Evaluate the current state regulatory structure for  
               natural gas storage facilities and recommend improvements;  
               and,


             h)   Clearly identify where additional information is  
               necessary to inform and improve the analyses.


          4)Provides that the measure is an urgency statute.
          FISCAL EFFECT:  Unknown


          COMMENTS:  


          1)Aliso Canyon Leak.  On October 23 2015, a natural gas storage  
            well, known as "SS-25" owned by Southern California Gas  
            (SoCalGas) and located in the Aliso Canyon storage field in  
            close proximity to the Porter Ranch neighborhood in Los  
            Angeles County began leaking natural gas.  The leak continued  








                                                                    AB 1905


                                                                    Page  4





            until it was initially controlled on February 11, 2016, and  
            the well was successfully sealed on February 18, 2016.  During  
            the four months the well leaked, there were numerous attempts  
            to control it.  All attempts to stop the leak from the top of  
            the well failed.  A relief well was finally able to stop the  
            natural gas leak by plugging the leaking well at its base.   
            According to a recent study, the leak at Aliso Canyon was the  
            largest natural gas leak recorded in the United States,  
            doubling the methane emission rate of the entire Los Angeles  
            basin.  Methane is a potent greenhouse gas with a global  
            warming potential more than 80 times as powerful as carbon  
            dioxide.  



            The South Coast Air Quality Management District has received  
            thousands of complaints regarding the odor.  Complaints by  
            residents suggest that mercaptans, which are odorants required  
            to be added to natural gas, have been present in Porter Ranch  
            at varying levels since the gas leak started.   Some people  
            may experience adverse health effects to the strong odors of  
            mercaptans, such as nausea and headaches.  In mid-November,  
            the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, citing  
            public health concerns associated with the use of odorants in  
            the natural gas, ordered SoCal Gas to provide temporary  
            housing relocation assistance to affected residents.  Over  
            5,000 Porter Ranch households were relocated due to the leak.   
            Now that the leak has been stopped, residents are returning  
            home regulators are investigating the cause of the leak, and a  
            comprehensive safety review of the other 114 wells at the  
            field has begun. 





          2)Natural Gas Storage Facilities.  Natural gas providers inject  
            natural gas into large underground reservoirs for storage  
            before later withdrawing the gas for sale during peak load  








                                                                    AB 1905


                                                                    Page  5





            periods.  These underground reservoirs often contained oil or  
            gas that has already been extracted.  Natural gas providers  
            utilize these facilities to reduce the cost of procurement and  
            to maintain adequate supply of natural gas during peak times.   
            While the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)  
            regulates natural gas providers, natural gas transmission  
            lines, and the permitting of natural gas storage facilities,  
            it is DOGGR that regulates the wells that natural gas is  
            injected into and withdrawn from.  Gas storage injection wells  
            are the only type of injection wells in DOGGR's UIC program  
            that are not part of the primacy agreement with US EPA.   
            DOGGR's UIC program regulates fourteen active gas storage  
            facilities in 12 separate fields across the state to ensure  
            well construction and integrity, appropriateness of the  
            injection site, and zonal isolation of the injections.  Each  
            natural gas storage facility may contain dozens of active gas  
            storage wells.  Many of these natural gas storage wells are  
            near residential development, similar to the Aliso Canyon  
            Natural Gas Storage Facility.  Some natural gas storage  
            facilities have been in operation since the 1940s and  
            approximately half of the active wells are over 40 years old.   
            Many of the older wells were not built to today's well  
            construction standards and lack the best technology available  
            to operate safely.



          3)DOGGR's UIC Problems.  In 1974, the Safe Drinking Water Act  
            gave the US EPA the authority and responsibility to control  
            underground injection to protect underground drinking water  
            sources.  In 1982, a primacy agreement was signed that allowed  
            DOGGR to implement the US EPA's UIC program for oil and gas  
            wells in California.  DOGGR's handling of the portion of the  
            UIC program delegated to it by the US EPA has come under  
            criticism in recent years.  A 2011 US EPA audit of DOGGR's UIC  
            program implementation concluded that DOGGR was misclassifying  
            underground sources of drinking water and doing an  
            insufficient job monitoring the UIC program.  In June 2014, it  
            was discovered that DOGGR was approving injection wells in  








                                                                    AB 1905


                                                                    Page  6





            nonexempt aquifers.  This included injections into aquifers  
            that were not properly exempted, but also included injections  
            into aquifers that were never exempt.  California  
            Environmental Protection Agency's (CalEPA) review found that  
            DOGGR's district offices were approving projects without  
            review from DOGGR and were making errors identifying the  
            injectable zone of exempt aquifers.  This included  
            misidentifying the borders and depth of the aquifer and  
            allowing expansion of productive limits over time beyond  
            boundaries established in the Primacy Application. 



            Last year SB 83 (Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review),  
            Chapter 24, Statutes of 2015, required the Secretary for  
            Environmental Protection and the Secretary of NRA to appoint  
            an independent review panel (Panel), on or before January 1,  
            2018.  The Panel will evaluate the regulatory performance of  
            DOGGR's administration of the UIC program and to make  
            recommendations on how to improve the effectiveness of the  
            program.  The recommendations the Panel can make include:  
            requests for additional resources; needed statutory or  
            regulatory changes; proposals for program reorganization; and,  
            whether to transfer the UIC program to the State Water  
            Resources Control Board.  In October 2015, DOGGR released a  
            plan titled "Renewal Plan For Oil and Gas Regulation" which  
            was intended to address concerns over its handling of the UIC  
            program and its regulation of oil and gas in general.  The  
            plan called for the review of all injection projects and the  
            review and updating of all UIC regulations.  Many of those  
            regulations had not been changed in decades.  Concerns have  
            been raised that DOGGR has not required enough inspections,  
            maintenance, or upgrades for older natural gas storage wells  
            to prevent leaks.  DOGGR indicates they were already in the  
            process of updating their gas storage regulations when the  
            leak occurred. 











                                                                    AB 1905


                                                                    Page  7







          4)State Actions.  On January 6, 2016, the Governor issued a  
            proclamation of a state of emergency, which directed several  
            state agencies to act in response to the Aliso Canyon gas  
            leak.  These actions included all of the following:
            


             a)   Direction to DOGGR to continue prohibiting all  
               injections into the Aliso Canyon;



             b)   Direction to CPUC and California Energy Commission (CEC)  
               to reduce the pressure of the facility by withdrawing gas;



             c)   Directing California Air Resources Board (ARB) to  
               require real-time monitoring of emissions;



             d)   Direction to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard  
               Assessment to review public health concerns, ensure energy  
               and natural gas reliability;



             e)   Direction to DOGGR to promulgate emergency regulations  
               to require new safety and reliability measures for  
               underground natural gas storage facilities; and,



             f)   Direction to DOGGR, CPUC, ARB, and CEC to assess the  
               long-term viability of natural gas storage facilities.









                                                                    AB 1905


                                                                    Page  8







            DOGGR established emergency regulations to improve the  
            regulation of gas storage wells. The regulations include the  
            requirement that within six months after the regulations  
            become effective, the operator of a gas storage facility to  
            submit a Risk Management Plan to DOGGR to assess the integrity  
            and risk associated with their gas storage project. 





          5)Independent Science Study.  This bill is very similar to a  
            requirement for an independent science study in SB 4 (Pavley),  
            Chapter 313, Statutes of 2013, which looked at the risks and  
            hazards well stimulation treatments posed to natural resources  
            and public, occupational, and environmental health and safety.  
             The Governor has directed DOGGR, CPUC, ARB, and CEC to assess  
            the long-term viability of natural gas storage facilities and  
            operators are being required by DOGGR to do a risk management  
            plan.  However, there is value in an independent scientific  
            review of natural gas storage in the state.  The independent  
            science study on well stimulation raised important questions  
            and issues, and the Governor's office formed a SB 4  
            interagency working group to respond to the study's findings  
            and recommendations.  The study required by this bill could  
            also help inform how the state regulates natural gas storage  
            facilities.



          6)Technical Amendments.  This bill asks the science study to  
            identify the proximity of natural gas storage facilities to  
            population centers, but does not define the term.  There are  
            other technical issues with the bill as well.  The author and  
            committee may wish to consider amending the bill to use  
            residential development instead of population centers and  
            correct technical issues.








                                                                    AB 1905


                                                                    Page  9






          7)Related Legislation.





          SB 380 (Pavley) imposes an immediate moratorium on natural gas  
          injection and a restriction on natural gas production at the  
          Aliso Canyon storage facility until certain conditions are met.   
          The bill is awaiting a hearing in the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee.



          SB 887 (Pavley) revises requirements for natural gas storage  
          facilities.  This bill will be heard on March 29 in the Senate  
          Natural Resources and Water Committee.   


             


          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:




          Support


          Environmental Defense Fund




          Opposition










                                                                    AB 1905


                                                                    Page  10





          None on file




          Analysis Prepared by:Michael Jarred / NAT. RES. / (916) 319-2092