Amended in Senate June 16, 2016

Amended in Assembly March 31, 2016

Amended in Assembly March 28, 2016

Amended in Assembly March 18, 2016

California Legislature—2015–16 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 1911


Introduced by Assembly Member Eggman

February 11, 2016


An act to repeal and add Section 241.2 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to juveniles.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 1911, as amended, Eggman. begin deleteDual-status end deletebegin insertDual status end insertminors.

Existing law requires the probation department and the child welfare services department in each county to jointly develop a written protocol, as specified, to ensure appropriate local coordination in the assessment of a minor who is both a dependent child and a ward of the juvenile court. Existing law requires, whenever a minor appears to be both a dependent child and a ward of the juvenile court, the county probation department and the child welfare services department, pursuant to that jointly developed written protocol, to initially determine which status will serve the best interests of the minor and the protection of society.

Existing law authorizes the probation department and the child welfare services department in a county to create a jointly written protocol to allow the 2 departments to jointly assess and produce a recommendation that the child be designated as a dual status child, as specified. Existing law requires the protocol to include a plan to collect data, and requires the Judicial Council to collect and compile the data. Existing law requires the Judicial Council to prepare an evaluation of the results of the implementation of the protocol, as specified, and to report its findings and any resulting recommendations to the Legislature within 2 years of the date those counties first deem a child to be a dual status child.

This bill would instead require the Judicial Council to convene a committee comprised of stakeholders involved in serving the needs of dependents or wards of the juvenile court, as specified. The bill would require the committee, by January 1, 2018, to develop and report to the Legislature its recommendations to facilitate and enhance comprehensive data and outcome tracking for the state’s youth involved in both the child welfare system and the juvenile justice system, and would require the recommendations to include specified information, including standardized definitions related to these youth. The bill would also require the State Department of Social Services, on or before January 1, 2019, to implement a function within the Child Welfare Services/Case Management System (CWS/CMS) that will enable county child welfare agencies and county probation departments to identify youth described above who are within their counties, and to issue instructions to all counties on the manner in which to completely and consistently track the involvement of these youth in both the child welfare system and the juvenile justice system.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

Section 241.2 of the Welfare and Institutions
2Code
is repealed.

3

SEC. 2.  

Section 241.2 is added to the Welfare and Institutions
4Code
, to read:

5

241.2.  

(a) The Judicial Council shall convene a committee
6comprised of stakeholders involved in serving the needs of
7dependents or wards of the juvenile court, including, but not limited
8to, judges, probation officers, social workers, youth involved in
9both the child welfare system and the juvenile justice system, child
10welfare and juvenile justice attorneys, child welfare and juvenile
11justice advocates, education officials, and representatives from the
12State Department of Social Services, county child welfare agencies,
P3    1and county probation departments. By January 1, 2018, the
2committee shall develop and report to the Legislature, pursuant to
3Section 9795 of the Government Code, its recommendations to
4facilitate and enhance comprehensive data and outcome tracking
5for the state’s youth involved in both the child welfare system and
6the juvenile justice system. The committee’s recommendations
7shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following:

8(1) A common identifier for counties to use to reconcile data
9across child welfare and juvenile justice systems statewide.

10(2) Standardized definitions for terms related to the populations
11of youth involved in both the child welfare system and the juvenile
12justice system.

13(3) Identified and defined outcomes for counties to track youth
14involved in both the child welfare system and the juvenile justice
15system, including, but not limited to, outcomes related to
16recidivism, health, pregnancy, homelessness, employment, and
17education.

18(4) Established baselines and goals for the identified and defined
19outcomes specified in paragraph (3).

20(5) An assessment as to the costs and benefits associated with
21requiring all counties to implement the committee’s
22recommendations.

begin insert

23
(6) An assessment of whether a single technology system,
24including, but not limited to, the State Department of Social
25Services’ Child Welfare Services/Case Management System
26(CWS/CMS), is needed to track youth in the child welfare system
27and the juvenile justice system.

end insert

28(b) The State Department of Social Services shall, on or before
29January 1, 2019, implement a function within thebegin delete Child Welfare
30Services/Case Management System (CWS/CMS)end delete
begin insert CWS/CMSend insert that
31will enable county child welfare agencies and county probation
32departments to identify youth involved in both the child welfare
33system and the juvenile justice system who are within their counties
34and shall issue instructions to all counties on how to completely
35and consistently track the involvement of these youth in both the
36child welfare system and the juvenile justice system.



O

    95