BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 1926 Page 1 Date of Hearing: May 4, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Lorena Gonzalez, Chair AB 1926 (Cooper) - As Amended March 30, 2016 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy |Labor and Employment |Vote:|6 - 0 | |Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: YesReimbursable: No SUMMARY: This bill requires an apprentice to be paid, unless otherwise provided by a collective bargaining agreement, when a contractor requests the dispatch of the apprentice to perform work on a AB 1926 Page 2 public works project and requires the apprentice to fill out an application, or undergo testing, training, an examination, or other pre-employment process as a condition of employment. Specifies the apprentice must be paid for time spent on the required activity, including travel time, at the prevailing wage rate for apprentices in the trade to which he or she is registered. FISCAL EFFECT: Minor/absorbable costs to the Department of Industrial Relations to enforce the requirements of the bill and process any related wage claims. COMMENTS: Purpose. Public works contractors are required to utilize one hour of apprentice work for every five hours of work performed by a journeyperson. To meet these requirements, contractors request apprentices from a state approved apprenticeship program in their geographic region. According to the sponsors, the State Building and Construction Trades, apprentices and construction workers are always required to travel to where the work is. However, when an apprentice is dispatched, but not put to work they lose out on an entire day's wages and miss the opportunity to learn new skills to advance in their training. This bill provides apprentices dispatched to contractors with the prevailing wage rate in the event a contractor does not use the apprentice for construction work, but requires the apprentice to undergo testing, added safety training, or any other pre-employment requirements. The apprentice would receive payment only for the time spent on the required activity. There is no known opposition to this bill. AB 1926 Page 3 Analysis Prepared by:Misty Feusahrens / APPR. / (916) 319-2081