BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Session AB 1931 (Rodriguez) - Emergency medical services: paramedics: discipline ----------------------------------------------------------------- | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Version: April 25, 2016 |Policy Vote: HEALTH 7 - 0 | | | | |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Urgency: No |Mandate: No | | | | |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Hearing Date: June 27, 2016 |Consultant: Brendan McCarthy | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File. Bill Summary: AB 1931 would change the process for performing disciplinary investigations of emergency medical technician-paramedics, by giving an employer the initial responsibility for conducting investigations. Fiscal Impact: One-time costs of $265,000 over two years for the Emergency Medical Services Authority to revise existing regulations relating to disciplinary investigations (General Fund). Ongoing costs of about $140,000 per year for the Emergency Medical Services Authority to conduct investigations in an expedited manner if the Authority does not agree with the findings and recommendation of an employer conducting an initial disciplinary investigation (General Fund). Under the bill, employers would have the ability to conduct the initial investigation and impose discipline. The Authority would then have the ability to review those findings and conduct its own AB 1931 (Rodriguez) Page 1 of ? investigation if the Authority does not agree with the findings of the employer. Under current law, disciplinary proceedings against a firefighter generally must be completed within one year. The Authority anticipates that many investigations initially conducted by an employer may not be resolved until close to the one-year deadline. In those cases, the Authority will need additional staff to conduct expedited investigations under the existing deadline. Background: There are three levels of emergency medical technician (EMT) in the state: EMT-I, EMT-II, and EMT-P (paramedic). Under current law, EMT-Is and EMT-IIs are certified by local emergency medical services agencies. On the other hand, EMT-Ps are licensed by the state Emergency Medical Services Authority (the Authority) and the Authority has primary responsibility to conduct disciplinary investigations when allegations of misconduct regarding EMT-Ps arise. Under current law, investigations and disciplinary proceedings against EMT-Is and EMT-IIs can be conducted by the employer. If the employer does not wish to conduct the investigation, it is conducted by the certifying entity (usually a local emergency medical services agency or LEMSA). There are requirements in law about notifications between employers, certifying entities, and the Authority. Current law, the "Firefighters Procedural Bill of Rights", provides for specified protections for firefighters undergoing disciplinary investigations. One of the protections in current law is one-year limitation on the duration of investigations (with certain exceptions). Proposed Law: AB 1931 would change the process for performing disciplinary investigations of emergency medical technician-paramedics (EMT-Ps), by giving an employer the initial responsibility for an conducting investigation. If an employer does not wish to conduct an investigation, the Authority would do so. Related Legislation: AB 1944 (Gatto, 2012) was similar to this bill. AB 1931 (Rodriguez) Page 2 of ? That bill was held on this committee's Suspense File. Staff Comments: Under current law, the state licenses EMT-Ps and has the responsibility to investigate and take disciplinary action against EMT-Ps who have violated existing law or regulations relating to their professional responsibilities. Employers of EMT-Ps retain the authority to take disciplinary action relating to an EMT-P's employment. This regulatory scheme is analogous to those used to regulate other professions and vocations licensed by the state. Under the bill, primary authority to enforce licensing and practice requirements for EMT-Ps would be delegated by the state to employers. The bill would still afford the Authority to conduct its own investigations, should the Authority disagree with the findings or actions of an employer. -- END --