BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       AB 1954|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                   THIRD READING 


          Bill No:  AB 1954
          Author:   Burke (D) 
          Amended:  8/17/16 in Senate
          Vote:     21 

           SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE:  7-2, 6/22/16
           AYES:  Hernandez, Hall, Mitchell, Monning, Pan, Roth, Wolk
           NOES:  Nguyen, Nielsen

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE:  5-2, 8/11/16
           AYES: Lara, Beall, Hill, McGuire, Mendoza
           NOES: Bates, Nielsen

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  53-23, 5/23/16 - See last page for vote

           SUBJECT:   Health care coverage:  reproductive health care  
                     services


          SOURCE:   California Family Health Council 
                    California Latinas for Reproductive Justice 
                    NARAL Pro-Choice California 

          
          DIGEST:  This bill establishes the Direct Access to Reproductive  
          Health Care Act, which prohibits health plans and health  
          insurers from requiring an enrollee to receive a referral prior  
          to receiving coverage or services for reproductive and sexual  
          health care services.

          Senate Floor Amendments of 8/17/16 clarify that for health  
          plans, 'reproductive and sexual health care services" do not  
          include the services subject to standing referral by a  
          specialist, as specified, and make other technical revisions.









                                                                    AB 1954  
                                                                    Page  2




          ANALYSIS: 
           
          Existing law:

          1)Establishes the Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC),  
            which regulates health care service plans (health plans), and  
            the California Department of Insurance (CDI), which regulates  
            insurers.

          2)Requires a health plan contract, or group or individual  
            disability insurance policy, except as specified, that is  
            issued, amended, renewed, or delivered on or after January 1,  
            2016, to provide coverage for specified services and  
            contraceptive methods for women.


          3)Requires every health plan contract, as specified, to allow an  
            enrollee the option to seek obstetrical and gynecological  
            physician services directly from a participating obstetrician  
            and gynecologist (OB-GYN) or directly from a participating  
            family practice physician and surgeon designated by the plan  
            as providing those services.  



          4)Permits a health plan or insurer to establish reasonable  
            provisions governing utilization protocols and the use of  
            OB-GYN, or family practice physicians and surgeons  
            participating in the plan network, medical group, or  
            independent practice association, consistent with the law,  
            those customarily applied to other physicians and surgeons,  
            such as primary care physicians and surgeons, to whom the  
            enrollee has direct access, and not more restrictive for the  
            provision of obstetrical and gynecological physician services.  
            Prohibits an enrollee from being required to obtain prior  
            approval from another physician, another provider, or the  
            health plan prior to obtaining direct access to obstetrical  
            and gynecological physician services.  Permits the plan to  
            establish reasonable requirements for the participating OB-GYN  
            or family practice physician and surgeon to communicate with  
            the enrollee's primary care physician and surgeon regarding  








                                                                    AB 1954  
                                                                    Page  3



            the enrollee's condition, treatment, and any need for  
            follow-up care.
          
          This bill:

          1)Requires every health plan contract or health insurance policy  
            issued, amended, renewed, or delivered on or after January 1,  
            2017, to be prohibited from requiring an enrollee to receive a  
            referral prior to receiving coverage or services for  
            reproductive and sexual health care services.

          2)Defines "reproductive and sexual health care services" as all  
            reproductive and sexual health services described in existing  
            law related to minor consent for HIV testing, pregnancy  
            prevention, sexual transmitted disease (STD) treatment and  
            medical treatment after rape and sexual assault, as specified.  
             Indicates that this bill applies whether or not the patient  
            is a minor.

          3)Permits a health plan or health insurer to establish  
            reasonable provisions governing utilization protocols for  
            obtaining reproductive and sexual health care services from  
            health care providers participating in, or contracting with,  
            the plan network, medical group, or independent practice  
            association, provided that these provisions are consistent  
            with the intent of this bill and those customarily applied to  
            other health care providers, such as primary care physicians  
            and surgeons, to whom the enrollee has direct access, and not  
            more restrictive for the provision of reproductive and sexual  
            health care services.

          4)Prohibits an enrollee or insured from being required to obtain  
            prior approval from another physician, another provider, the  
            health plan or health insurer prior to obtaining direct access  
            to reproductive and sexual health care services.  Permits a  
            plan or insurer to establish provisions governing  
            communication with the enrollee's primary care physician and  
            surgeon regarding the enrollee's or insured's condition,  
            treatment, and any need for follow-up care.

          5)Prohibits a health plan or health insurer from imposing  
            utilization protocols related to contraceptive drugs,  








                                                                    AB 1954  
                                                                    Page  4



            supplies, and devices, as specified.

          6)Exempts specialized health plans, specialized health  
            insurance, health plans governed by Medi-Cal, Medicare  
            supplement insurance, short-term limited duration health  
            insurance, CHAMPUS supplement insurance, or TRICARE supplement  
            insurance, or to hospital indemnity, accident-only, and  
            specified disease insurance; and a health plan or insurance  
            policy that does not require insureds to obtain a referral  
            prior to seeking covered services from a specialist.

          7)States legislative intent that there are wide variances in  
            health benefit plans regarding referral requirements for  
            reproductive and sexual health care services, and women across  
            the state are obtaining these vital services from other  
            licensed provider types, including family practice physicians,  
            nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and certified  
            nurse-midwives; and this bill is intended to increase timely,  
            equal, and direct access to time-sensitive and comprehensive  
            reproductive and sexual health care services.


          Comments
          
          1)Author's statement.  According to the author, for many women,  
            reproductive health care is primary care.  Nearly  
            three-quarters of women of reproductive age in the nation  
            receive at least one sexual or reproductive health service  
            each year.  While we've taken some steps to improve access to  
            care, including the allowance through the Affordable Care Act  
            which enables women to access OB-GYN care without a referral,  
            there is still more to be done to ensure that Californians  
            have timely access to the care they need without unnecessary  
            barriers.  AB 1954 eliminates the patchwork of referral  
            policies for in-network providers for enrollees seeking  
            reproductive and sexual health care services.  By removing the  
            unnecessary administrative burdens that cause delays in care,  
            this bill levels the playing field across plans, creating more  
            equitable access to care for all enrollees.  

          2)Use and access to services.  The California Health Benefits  
            Review Program (CHBRP) reviewed an earlier version of AB 1954  








                                                                    AB 1954  
                                                                    Page  5



            which mandated coverage for out-of-network reproductive and  
            sexual health care. CHBRP resulted from the passage of AB 1996  
            (Thomson, Chapter 795, Statutes of 2002), which requested the  
            University of California to assess legislation proposing a  
            mandated benefit or service and prepare a written analysis  
            with relevant data on the medical, economic, and public health  
            impacts of proposed health plan and health insurance benefit  
            mandate legislation. Although the CHBRP analysis is not  
            entirely relevant based on the current version of AB 1954, the  
            CHBRP report provides some helpful background information.   
            For example, according to CHBRB, it is estimated that among  
            the insured population in California aged 12 and older, 21%  
            get tested for an STD each year.  Access to timely screening  
            and treatment for STDs and HIV testing is critical to  
            preventing further spread of these diseases and limiting the  
            health impacts of infected individuals.  Timely access to care  
            has been cited by patients of specialized STD testing and  
            reproductive health clinics as a major reason for seeking  
            services there instead of at their usual places of care, even  
            among those patients who have health insurance (Hoover et al.,  
            2015).  Unmet need for prevention and treatment of pregnancy  
            services among the insured population may be underestimated  
            due to their use of specialized publicly-funded family  
            planning clinics.


          FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:    No          Fiscal  
          Com.:YesLocal:   Yes


          According to the Senate Committee of Appropriations:

          1)One-time costs of $150,000 and ongoing costs of $20,000 per  
            year for the adoption of regulations and the review of plan  
            filings by the Department of Managed Health Care (Managed Care  
            Fund).

          2)Ongoing costs of about $10,000 per year for review of health  
            insurer filings by the Department of Insurance (Insurance  
            Fund).

          3)No impact to the Medi-Cal program is anticipated, as the bill  








                                                                    AB 1954  
                                                                    Page  6



            specifically excludes health plans that contract with the  
            Medi-Cal program from the requirements in the bill.

          4)No significant cost impact is anticipated for health care  
            coverage paid for by CalPERS. According to an analysis of a  
            prior version of this bill (which would have also required  
            health insurers and health plans to provide access to  
            out-of-network providers of reproductive and sexual health  
            care services), the California Health Benefits Review Program  
            projected that there would not be a significant overall  
            increase in utilization of services. Therefore, the Program  
            projects that the bill will not result in an increase in  
            health care premiums for CalPERS.

          5)No state cost to subsidize health care coverage through  
            Covered California is anticipated. Under federal law, any new  
            mandated health benefit that exceeds the benefits in the  
            state's essential health benefits benchmark plan would be a  
            state responsibility. In other words, to the extent that the  
            state imposes a new benefit mandate that exceeds the essential  
            health benefits benchmark, the state would be responsible for  
            paying for the cost to subsidize that benefit for those  
            individuals who are receiving subsidized coverage through  
            Covered California. Because this bill does not mandate a new  
            benefit, but only change the terms of an existing benefit  
            (access to reproductive and sexual health care services), the  
            bill is not expected to result in the state being responsible  
            for subsidizing coverage.


          SUPPORT:   (Verified8/17/16)


          California Family Health Council (co-source)
          California Latinas for Reproductive Justice (co-source)
          NARAL Pro-Choice California (co-source)
          ACT for Women
          American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists District IX
          Anti-Defamation League 
          Bayer 
          Black Women for Wellness 
          California Academy of Family Physicians








                                                                    AB 1954  
                                                                    Page  7



          California Health+Advocates
          California National Organization for Women
          California Primary Care Association 
          Community Clinic Association of Los Angeles County
          Community Clinic Consortium 
          Forward Together 
          HIVE 
          Latino Coalition for a Healthy California 
          Law Students for Reproductive Justice 
          Los Angeles LGBT Center
          Maternal and Child Health Access 
          NARAL Pro-Choice California
          National Association of Social Workers 
          National Health Law Program 
          Nevada County Citizens for Choice 
          Northeast Valley Health Corporation
          Physicians for Reproductive Health
          Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California
          Secular Coalition for California
          URGE: Unite for Reproductive & Gender Equity
          Women's Community Clinic
          Women's Health Specialists of California


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified8/17/16)


          California Catholic Conference
          California Right to Life Committee, INC 


          ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT:     The California Family Health Council  
          writes that nearly three-quarters of women of reproductive age  
          in the nation receive at least one sexual or reproductive health  
          service each year.  Commercial health plans operating in  
          California currently widely vary in terms of referral policies.   
          Variances in these policies have created a patchwork of coverage  
          and access to time sensitive-reproductive health services.   
          NARAL Pro-Choice California indicates that requiring referrals  
          also triggers potential confidentiality concerns that lead to  
          further delays in obtaining care. ACT for Women writes that this  
          bill would remove unnecessary administrative burdens that cause  








                                                                    AB 1954  
                                                                    Page  8



          delays in care, and level the playing field to create greater,  
          more equitable access to sexual and reproductive health care  
          services by allowing access without referrals.  The American  
          Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists District IX writes  
          that this bill builds on the Affordable Care Act by allowing  
          patients in commercial health plans to obtain family planning  
          and sexual health services without referrals from other  
          providers including advanced practice clinicians, like nurse  
          practitioners and certified nurse midwives. 


          ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION:     The California Catholic Conference,  
          Inc., believes this bill reduces the standard of care for women  
          and girls because it would bypass the referral process in our  
          health care system.  AB 1954 would not be in the best interest  
          of women, nonetheless young girls who are generally much less  
          informed about their own reproductive and sexual health care.   
          The California Right to Life Committee, INC, finds this bill to  
          be detrimental to women's and children's health, irresponsible  
          spending of health care dollars and an actual barrier to  
          betterment of lives in general.

          ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  53-23, 5/23/16
          AYES:  Alejo, Atkins, Baker, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brown,  
            Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooper,  
            Dababneh, Daly, Dodd, Frazier, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo  
            Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Hadley,  
            Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Lopez,  
            Low, Maienschein, McCarty, Medina, Mullin, Nazarian,  
            O'Donnell, Olsen, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Santiago,  
            Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Weber, Williams, Wood, Rendon
          NOES:  Achadjian, Travis Allen, Bigelow, Brough, Chávez, Dahle,  
            Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Grove, Harper, Jones, Kim, Lackey,  
            Linder, Mathis, Mayes, Melendez, Obernolte, Salas, Steinorth,  
            Wagner, Waldron, Wilk
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Arambula, Cooley, Eggman, Patterson

          Prepared by:Teri Boughton / HEALTH / (916) 651-4111
          8/22/16 9:47:52


                                   ****  END  ****








                                                                    AB 1954  
                                                                    Page  9