BILL ANALYSIS Ó
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 1960|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 1960
Author: Lackey (R), et al.
Amended: 8/2/16 in Senate
Vote: 21
SENATE TRANS. & HOUSING COMMITTEE: 10-0, 6/28/16
AYES: Beall, Cannella, Allen, Bates, Gaines, Galgiani, Leyva,
McGuire, Mendoza, Roth
NO VOTE RECORDED: Wieckowski
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: Senate Rule 28.8
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 78-0, 5/12/16 (Consent) - See last page for
vote
SUBJECT: Vehicles: Basic Inspection of Terminals program
SOURCE: California Cattlemens Association
DIGEST: This bill excludes an agricultural vehicle, as defined,
from the Basic Inspection of Terminals (BIT) program conducted
by the California Highway Patrol (CHP).
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
1)Requires CHP to regulate the safe operation of commercial and
various other types of vehicles, as specified.
AB 1960
Page 2
2)Prohibits a motor carrier from operating specific types of
vehicles without identifying to CHP all terminals in the state
where those vehicles may be inspected.
3)Requires motor carriers to make vehicles and records available
for inspection by CHP. If a motor carrier fails to provide
vehicles and records, an unsatisfactory terminal rating is
required to be issued by CHP.
4)Provides that under the BIT program, the inspection of
vehicles at a terminal be based on a representative sample of
a terminal fleet size, according to a specified schedule.
5)Requires CHP to place an inspection priority on motor-carrier
terminals that have never been previously inspected, vehicles
transporting hazardous materials, and vehicles that receive
unsatisfactory ratings. Provides that non-priority terminals
are not required to be inspected less than six years since
their last inspection.
This bill:
1)Defines an "agricultural vehicle" as a vehicle or combination
of vehicles with a gross combination weight rating or a gross
vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of 26,000 pounds or less that is
operated by a farmer, employee of a farmer, or instructor
credentialed in agriculture as part of an instructional
program at the high school, community college, or university
level; used exclusively in the conduct of agricultural
operations; not used in the capacity of a for-hire carrier or
for compensation; and where the towing vehicle has a GVWR of
16,000 pounds or less.
2)Exempts an agricultural vehicle from the BIT program.
3)Includes several technical cleanup amendments and adds
double-jointing language to avoid chaptering out conflicts
with AB 995 (Bigelow) of the current legislative session.
Comments
1)Purpose. The author notes, "Vehicle and vehicle combinations
subject to BIT include commonly-used pickup trucks and
AB 1960
Page 3
pickup-and-trailer combinations that for most farmers and
ranchers also serve as their personal vehicles. If not used in
farming, ranching or another commercial enterprise, these
vehicles and vehicle combinations would otherwise be exempt
from the BIT program."
The author introduced this bill to propose a narrowly tailored
exemption from BIT solely for farmers and ranchers, so long as
the pickup and/or pickup-and-trailer combination is used
solely in agriculture, not used for hire, the total gross
combined weight rating of the pickup and trailer does not
exceed 26,000 pounds, the pickup or towing vehicle has a GVWR
of less than 16,000 pounds, and the vehicle(s) are used solely
in intrastate commerce.
2)CHP's BIT program. The BIT program was implemented to ensure
the safe operation of commercial vehicles by a motor carrier
through the inspection of those vehicles at motor-carrier
terminals. In 2013, AB 529 (Lowenthal, Chapter 500, Statutes
of 2013) revised the BIT program to establish a
performance-based model for inspections, moving away from
motor-carrier terminal inspections occurring once every 25
months to a model where ongoing compliant motor carriers may
be inspected only once every six years. Non-compliant
carriers would be targeted for additional inspections to
ensure compliance. In switching to this performance-based
system, more classifications of commercial motor vehicles were
brought into the jurisdiction of BIT inspections, which both
increased the number of vehicles inspected for safety by CHP
and spread the cost for operating the program over a greater
number of vehicles. Implementation of the revised BIT program
began January 1, 2016, and fees required under the BIT program
start at $130 per terminal annually for the smallest fleet
sizes.
3)A necessary carve-out? Although the exemption proposed by
this bill relates only to agricultural vehicles, it is unclear
why these particular vehicles need to be exempted from the BIT
program. The author's argument that these vehicles are used
for both passenger and commercial purposes (i.e., more
operation on public roads and highways) provides a greater
argument as to why these vehicles should in fact be included
in the BIT program.
AB 1960
Page 4
Furthermore, it is unclear what the safety impact of this
exemption would be. If the specified vehicles are not inspected
under the BIT program, the risk of non-compliance with vehicle
safety standards and properly maintained driver records is
increased. However, it is important to note that these vehicles
will still be subject to various safety requirements, including
motor-carrier permit and commercial driver's license
requirements, and if a vehicle or carrier is found to be in
violation of such requirements, they would still be subject to
the appropriate penalties.
Lastly, with a particular exemption for agricultural vehicles,
this bill sets a precedent which may lead to future legislative
proposals for vehicle exemptions from other industries.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal
Com.:YesLocal: No
SUPPORT: (Verified8/1/16)
California Cattlemen's Association (source)
Association of California Egg Farmers
California Association of Wine Grape Growers
California Farm Bureau Federation
California Grain & Feed Association
California Poultry Federation
Family Winemakers of California
Western Growers Association
OPPOSITION: (Verified8/1/16)
California Teamsters Public Affairs Council
Western States Trucking Association
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 78-0, 5/12/16
AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Arambula, Atkins, Baker,
Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Calderon,
Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper,
AB 1960
Page 5
Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines,
Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson,
Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger
Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder,
Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina,
Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen,
Patterson, Quirk, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago,
Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber,
Wilk, Williams, Wood, Rendon
NO VOTE RECORDED: Burke, Jones-Sawyer
Prepared by:Manny Leon / T. & H. / (916) 651-4121
8/15/16 9:24:30
**** END ****