BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 1960


                                                                    Page  1


          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS


          AB  
          1960 (Lackey)


          As Amended  August 17, 2016


          Majority vote


           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |78-0  |(May 12, 2016) |SENATE: |39-0  |(August 23,      |
          |           |      |               |        |      |2016)            |
          |           |      |               |        |      |                 |
          |           |      |               |        |      |                 |
           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Original Committee Reference:  TRANS.


          SUMMARY:  Excludes an agricultural vehicle, as defined, from the  
          Basic Inspection of Terminals (BIT) program conducted by the  
          California Highway Patrol (CHP).


          The Senate amendments:


          1)Add a sunset date of January 1, 2023, to the bill's  
            provisions, and require CHP, in consultation with the  
            Department of Motor Vehicles, to report to the Governor and  
            the Legislature on the impact of excluding agricultural  
            vehicles from the BIT program, including on collisions  
            involving excluded vehicles and any traffic safety issues  
            associated with excluded vehicles by January 1, 2022.


          2)Add provisions from AB 995 (Bigelow) of the current  








                                                                    AB 1960


                                                                    Page  2


            legislative session to avoid chaptering out conflicts.


          3)Make other technical, non-substantive changes.


          EXISTING LAW:  


          1)Requires CHP to regulate the safe operation of specified  
            vehicles, including, but not limited to, the following:
             a)   Motortrucks of three or more axles with a gross vehicle  
               weight rating (GVWR) over 10,000 pounds;
             b)   A combination of a motortruck and a specified vehicle or  
               vehicles that exceeds 40 feet in length when coupled  
               together; and,


             c)   A commercial motor vehicle with a GVWR over 26,000  
               pounds or a commercial motor vehicle of any GVWR towing a  
               trailer with a GVWR over 10,000 pounds, except combinations  
               including camp trailers, trailer coaches, or utility  
               trailers.


          1)Prohibits a motor carrier from operating any of the above  
            specified types of vehicles without identifying to CHP all  
            terminals in the state where those vehicles may be inspected  
            and requires motor carriers to make vehicles and records  
            available for inspection by CHP.
          2)Requires CHP to place an inspection priority on motor carrier  
            terminals that have never been previously inspected and  
            provides that non-priority terminals are not required to be  
            inspected less than six years since their last inspection.


          AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY, this bill defined an "agricultural  
          vehicle" as a vehicle or combination of vehicles with a gross  
          combination weight rating or a GVWR of 26,000 pounds or less  
          that is:  operated by a farmer, employee of a farmer, or  
          instructor credentialed in agriculture as part of an  
          instructional program at the high school, community college, or  








                                                                    AB 1960


                                                                    Page  3


          university level; used exclusively in the conduct of  
          agricultural operations; not used in the capacity of a for-hire  
          carrier or for compensation; and where the towing vehicle has a  
          GVWR of 16,000 pounds or less and exempted this type of vehicle  
          from the BIT program.


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee, pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8, negligible state costs.


          COMMENTS:  The BIT program was implemented to ensure the safe  
          operation of commercial vehicles by a motor carrier through the  
          inspection of those vehicles at motor carrier terminals.  AB 529  
          (Lowenthal), Chapter 500, Statutes of 2013, revised the BIT  
          program to establish a performance-based model for inspections,  
          where ongoing compliant motor carriers may be inspected only  
          once every six years and non-compliant carriers would be  
          targeted for additional inspections.  More classifications of  
          commercial motor vehicles were also brought into the  
          jurisdiction of BIT inspections.  Implementation of the revised  
          BIT program began January 1, 2016, and fees start at $130 per  
          terminal annually for the smallest fleets.


          This bill would exempt vehicles and vehicle combinations  
          operated by a farmer used solely or agricultural purposes and  
          not used for-hire, as long as the gross combined weight rating  
          of the combination does not exceed 26,000 pounds and the towing  
          vehicle has a GVWR of less than 16,000 pounds.  According to the  
          author, BIT inspections of vehicles, including commonly-used  
          pickup trucks and trailers used by farmers in their commercial  
          enterprises and as their personal vehicles, may restrict an  
          individual from operating a vehicle critical to his or her  
          farming or ranching functions.  The author states, "Although the  
          BIT program may be appropriate for California's for-hire  
          semi-truck fleet, regulating small family farmers and ranchers  
          using pickups to haul tractors, equipment or a handful of cows  
          is simply unnecessary."


          Committee concerns:  Although the exemption proposed by this  








                                                                    AB 1960


                                                                    Page  4


          bill relates only to agricultural vehicles, it is unclear what  
          the safety impact of that exemption would be.  The vehicles  
          exempted from BIT by this bill would still be subject to other  
          standards, including motor carrier permit and commercial  
          driver's license requirements, and if a vehicle or carrier is  
          found to be in violation, of those standards, they would still  
          be subject to the appropriate penalties.


          The exemption proposed by this bill includes combinations of  
          vehicles used for agricultural operations with a gross combined  
          wright rating of less than 26,000 pounds, as long as the towing  
          vehicle has a GVWR of less than 16,000 pounds.  This could  
          potentially lead to light pickup trucks towing trailers over  
          10,000 pounds, without being subject to at least periodic  
          inspection.  While use of these combinations may, as the author  
          states, be limited to incidental and not for-hire use by small  
          agricultural outfits, this bill would not prevent larger  
          agricultural operators from using these combinations over long  
          ranges on highways where other motorists would be exposed to  
          these uninspected and potentially unsafe vehicles.  This bill  
          would do nothing to distinguish vehicle combinations on the road  
          operated by farmers from those operated by any other occupation,  
          making it unclear how CHP or other law enforcement agencies  
          would be able to determine what vehicles are subject to  
          inspection and what vehicles are not.


          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Justin Behrens / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093  FN:  
          0004558



















                                                                    AB 1960


                                                                    Page  5