BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 1979


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  May 11, 2016


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                               Lorena Gonzalez, Chair


          AB  
          1979 (Bigelow) - As Amended April 26, 2016


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Utilities and Commerce         |Vote:|14 - 0       |
          |Committee:   |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  NoReimbursable:  No


          SUMMARY:


          This bill requires the California Public Utilities Commission  
          (PUC) to direct electrical corporations to authorize a  
          hydroelectric generation facility with a nameplate (total  
          possible output) generating capacity of up to 5 MW to  
          participate in the feed-in tariff, if the facility delivers no  
          more than 3 MW to the grid at any time and complies with  
          specified interconnection and payment requirements.


          FISCAL EFFECT:










                                                                    AB 1979


                                                                    Page  2





          One-time, short-term increased PUC workload absorbable within  
          existing resources.  However, this increased workload may  
          potentially delay implementation of other RPS programs and  
          policies.


          COMMENTS:


          1)Purpose.  According to the author, the feed-in tariff program  
            has proven to be underutilized, especially with baseload power  
            like small hydropower. There are only about 14 small  
            hydropower facilities throughout California that have a  
            nameplate value between 3-5MW, are certified renewable, and  
            that might otherwise be eligible for the renewable Feed-In  
            Tariff (FIT). 
            


            By narrowly expanding eligibility for the FIT program, some of  
            these facilities will be able to participate as long as they  
            commit to generating less than 3 MW. According to the author,  
            this will provide an essential lifeline for some of these  
            small hydropower companies





          2)Background.  A FIT is a contract that provides a guaranteed  
            fixed payment for the energy produced.  All investor-owned  
            utilities (IOUs) and publicly owned utilities (POUs) that  
            serve more than 75,000 retail customers are required to  
            develop a standard contract or tariff available for renewable  
            energy facilities up to 3 MWs capped at 750 MWs statewide.



            Existing law limits hydroelectric facility eligibility to  








                                                                    AB 1979


                                                                    Page  3





            projects with an effective capacity of not more than three  
            megawatts. The PUC, in Decision 12-05-035, stated that this  
            capacity shall be determined by the "nameplate" - the metal  
            plate attached to a generator by the manufacturer listing  
            model number and other details.  If a hydroelectric generator  
            has a nameplate of over three MW it is prohibited from  
            participating in the FIT even if generator will never actually  
            run above the three MW threshold. 





            This bill limits this provision to single hydroelectric  
            facilities that are eligible under the Renewable Portfolios  
            Standard (RPS) and are not under a long-term contract prior to  
            January 1, 2017.


          3)Similar Legislation.  AB 1923 (Wood) expands the 3MW limit for  
            biomass facilities. This bill passed this Committee and is  
            pending on the Assembly floor.


          Analysis Prepared by:Jennifer Galehouse / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081