BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2015 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 12, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES Susan Bonilla, Chair AB 2015 (McCarty) - As Amended March 18, 2016 SUBJECT: Public social services: 2011 realignment report SUMMARY: Requires additional information to be included in the 2011 child welfare services realignment report. Specifically, this bill: 1)Deletes language making the requirement for the annual 2011 realignment report to the Legislature to include information on fund allocation, social worker caseloads, and authorized positions, as specified, conditional upon that information being readily or publically available. 2)Requires the 2011 realignment report to include the following information: a) Reported expenditures for counties that are participating in and making claims under the federal Title IV-E waiver; AB 2015 Page 2 b) How waiver counties are maximizing the utilization of funds; and c) How close counties are to funding the recommended optimum caseloads, as specified. EXISTING LAW: 1)States Legislative intent to ensure that the impacts of the 2011 realignment of child welfare services, foster care, adoptions, and adult protective services programs are identified and evaluated, and that information regarding these impacts is publicly available and accessible and can be used to support the state's and counties' effectiveness in delivering services and supports. (WIC 10104 (a)) 2)Requires the Department of Social Services (DSS) to annually report to the Legislature and make publicly available, by April 15, a summary of outcome and expenditure data that allows for monitoring of changes over time, as specified. (WIC 10104 (b) and (c)(1)) 3)Requires the report, to the extent that the information is readily or publicly available, to also contain information on Protective Services Growth Special Account allocations across counties, social worker caseloads, and authorized positions, as specified. (WIC 10104 (c)(2)) 4)Provides for the Protective Services Growth Special Account within the Support Services Growth Subaccount, which is within AB 2015 Page 3 the Sales and Use Tax Growth Account of the Local Revenue Fund 2011. (GOV 30025) FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown. COMMENTS: 2011 realignment: Child welfare services in California are funded through a mix of federal, state, and county dollars. The Budget Act of 2011 realigned public safety programs from the state to the local level, moving programs and fiscal responsibility to local governments. The fiscal responsibility for the nonfederal share of costs for the child welfare services system was shifted largely to the counties with the 2011 realignment. Title IV-E waiver: While there are several federal funding sources for child welfare services, the main dedicated source is "Title IV-E" funding authorized under the Social Security Act. These funds are restricted to use for child welfare services administration, foster care assistance payments, and assistance payments to caretakers who have adopted or assumed guardianship of foster children through the Adoption Assistance Program or Kinship-Guardianship Assistance (Kin-GAP). While Title IV-E funds are rather inflexible, there is a "Title IV-E waiver demonstration project" allowing for more flexible AB 2015 Page 4 use of funds, including for purposes of investing in ways to safely reduce the need for foster care. Beginning in 2007, Los Angeles and Alameda Counties have been part of the waiver demonstration project. In 2014-15, a waiver extension was granted to those two counties, and the waiver was expanded to Butte, Lake, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, Santa Clara and Sonoma counties. All waivers end in 2019. The goal of the demonstration project, which is operating in 28 states, is to measure outcomes for youth of more flexible use of federal funds, aimed at reducing the number of children who enter foster care and the time spent in foster care. California SB 2030 Study: SB 2030 (Costa), Chapter 785, Statutes of 1998, required DSS to secure a contract to evaluate the child welfare services budget methodology and make recommendations to revise it, including appropriate caseload levels, supportive services, and preventative services, in order to accurately and adequately fund the system. The final report was released in April 2000; among other things, it established caseload standards. Need for this bill: According to the author, "It has been five years since realignment and, while there have been some improvements; there are still areas where counties can vastly improve in the delivery of care and services to California's foster youth. [This bill] will expand existing realignment reporting requirements by requiring the collection of data relative to maximization of program funding, social worker caseload ratios and case manager oversight review. This additional information will further ensure that participating county program goals are aligned with the State's priorities under the 2011 realignment." PRIOR LEGISLATION: AB 2015 Page 5 SB 855 (Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review), Chapter 29, Statutes of 2014, added the requirement to the 2011 realignment report that, to the extent that the information is readily or publicly available, the report shall also contain the amount of funds each county receives from the Protective Services Growth Special Account, as specified, child welfare services social worker caseloads per county, and the number of authorized positions in the local child welfare services agency. SB 1020 (Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review), Chapter 40, Statutes of 2012, established an overall financing structure for the 2011 Public Safety Realignment, creating, among other things, the Protective Services Growth Special Account within the Support Services Growth Subaccount, which was established by this bill within the Sales and Use Tax Growth Account of the Local Revenue Fund 2011. SB 2030 (Costa), Chapter 785, Statutes of 1998, required DSS to secure a contract to evaluate the child welfare services budget methodology and make recommendations to revise it, including appropriate caseload levels, supportive services, and preventative services, in order to accurately and adequately fund the system. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: Support AB 2015 Page 6 None on file. Opposition None on file. Analysis Prepared by:Daphne Hunt / HUM. S. / (916) 319-2089