BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 2024 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 5, 2016 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS Rudy Salas, Chair AB 2024 (Wood) - As Introduced February 16, 2016 NOTE: This bill is double-referred, and if passed by this Committee, it will be referred to the Assembly Committee on Health. SUBJECT: Critical access hospitals: employment. SUMMARY: Permits a federally certified critical access hospital (CAH) to employ physicians and charge for professional services rendered by those physicians. EXISTING LAW: 1)Provides for the licensure and regulation of physicians and surgeons by the Medical Board of California (MBC). 2)Prohibits corporations and other artificial legal entities from having any professional rights, privileges, or powers (known as the "prohibition against the corporate practice of medicine" (CPM)), and further provides that the Division of Licensing of MBC may, pursuant to regulations MBC has adopted, grant approval for the employment of physicians on a salaried basis by a licensed charitable institution, foundation, or clinic if no charge for professional services rendered to AB 2024 Page 2 patients is made by that institution, foundation, or clinic. 3)Exempts medical or podiatry professional corporations organized and practicing pursuant to the Moscone-Knox Professional Corporations Act from the CPM prohibition, providing that a majority of the owners or shareholders of the corporation are licensed physicians or podiatrists, respectively. 4)Provides certain additional exceptions to the prohibition against CPM, including: a) Clinics operated primarily for the purpose of medical education by a public or private nonprofit university medical school, to charge for professional services rendered to teaching patients by licensed physicians who hold academic appointments on the faculty of the university, if the charges are approved by the physician in whose name the charges are made; b) Certain nonprofit clinics organized and operated exclusively for scientific and charitable purposes, that have been conducting research since before 1982, and that meet other specified requirements, to employ physicians and charge for professional services. Prohibits, however, these clinics from interfering with, controlling, or otherwise directing a physician's professional judgment in a manner prohibited by the CPM prohibition or any other provision of law; c) A narcotic treatment program, but prohibits the narcotic clinic from interfering with, controlling, or otherwise directing a physician's professional judgment in a manner that is prohibited by the CPM prohibition or any other provision of law; AB 2024 Page 3 d) Under the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975 (Knox-Keene), authorizes licensed health care service plans to employ or contract with health care professionals, including physicians, to deliver professional services, and requires health plans to demonstrate that medical decisions are rendered by qualified medical providers unhindered by fiscal and administrative management; and, e) In the Medi-Cal Program, permits hospitals that submit claims for hospital inpatient psychiatric services under contract with Medi-Cal managed care plans to receive reimbursement on a per diem basis for an array of services, including a mental health professional's daily visit fee. 5)Defines a "small and rural hospital" as an acute care hospital that is designated within specified peer groups based upon a December 20, 1982 report, as specified; or that is designated within other specified peer groups, has no more than 76 acute care beds, and is located in an incorporated place or census designated place of 15,000 or less population according to the 1980 federal census. 6)Permits hospitals designated as CAHs and certified by the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services under the federal Medicare rural hospital flexibility program to be eligible for supplemental payments for covered outpatient services rendered to Medi-Cal eligible persons. 7)Provides that payments made pursuant to #4) are contingent upon receipt of federal financial participation, and are limited by the appropriation in the annual Budget Act for the non- federal share of these payments. Requires supplemental payments to be apportioned among CAHs based upon their number of Medi-Cal outpatient visits. AB 2024 Page 4 8)Permits the Department of Health and Human Services to develop criteria to waive any requirements for CAHs under the federal Medicare Rural Hospital Flexibility Program, that are in conflict with federal requirements, if the department finds that it is in the public interest to do so, and the department determines that the waiver would not negatively affect the quality of patient care. 9)Specifies that a CAH is a general acute care hospital, and every hospital designated by the department as a CAH, and certified as such by the United States Department of Health and Human Services, shall be deemed to be a general acute care hospital, even if the department waives regulatory requirements otherwise applicable to general acute care hospitals. 10)Indicates that each hospital designated by the department as a CAH, and certified as such by the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services under the federal Medicare rural hospital flexibility program, shall be eligible for supplemental payments for Medi-Cal covered outpatient services rendered to Medi-Cal eligible persons. 11)Specifies that payments made shall be contingent upon receipt of federal financial participation, and shall be limited by the appropriation in the annual Budget Act for the nonfederal share of these payments. Supplemental payments shall be apportioned among CAHs based upon their number of Medi-Cal outpatient visits. THIS BILL: 12)Permits a federally certified CAH to employ licensees and charge for professional services rendered by those licensees. AB 2024 Page 5 13)Specifies that the critical access hospital shall not interfere with, control, or otherwise direct the professional judgment of a physician and surgeon. FISCAL EFFECT: None. This bill is keyed non-fiscal by the Legislative Counsel. COMMENTS: Purpose. This bill is sponsored by the author. According to the author, "As a health care provider I am sympathetic to the concerns about interference with the clinical judgment of any health care provider. Unfortunately, the corporate practice of medicine ban no longer provides the protections it was originally intended to provide. The number of exceptions allowed, combined with the growth of medical groups, independent practice associations and medical foundations, all represent the larger medical communities response to pressures within the delivery system to reduce costs, improve patient outcomes and increase access. To maintain that the corporate ban protects a physician's professional judgment and autonomy is naïve and does not take into consideration that variety of pressures that are inherent in our health care delivery system. Protecting a clinician's professional judgment is critical and something that we should fight to preserve but the CPM doctrine may no longer be the best way to assure this protection and other alternative[s] should be explored. The private practice of medicine is a valuable component in our communities and should be preserved but preserving it to the exclusion of other modes of practice seems shortsighted. If younger physicians are comfortable in an employment setting, we should not limit those options for them." AB 2024 Page 6 Background. Physician Shortage. Estimates obtained from the Council on Graduate Medical Education (CGME) indicate that the number of primary care physicians actively practicing in California is far below the state's need. The distribution of these primary care physicians is also poor. In 2008, there were 69,460 actively practicing primary care physicians in California, of which only 35 percent reported they actually practiced primary care. This equates to 63 active primary care physicians per 100,000 persons. However, according to the CGME, up to 80 primary care physicians are needed per 100,000 persons in order to adequately meet the needs of the population. When the same metric is applied regionally, only 16 of California's 58 counties fall within the needed supply range for primary care physicians. In other words, less than one third of Californians live in a community where they have access to adequate health care services. When rural communities are examined, there is a significant shortage of physicians. Rural hospitals experience difficulty in recruiting and retaining physicians. Factors influencing this include a lack of benefits and retirement as a result of working as an independent contractor. Similarly, results of a 2015 survey of medical residents indicate that 92 percent of respondents would prefer employment with a salary versus working as an independent practitioner (Merritt Hawkins, Survey of Final-Year Medical Residents, 2015). Critical Access Hospitals. The CAH program was created by Congress in 1997 in response to numerous rural hospitals closing across the nation in the 1980s and 1990s. It is a designation provided by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to ensure that individuals in isolated areas have access to health care services. The Medicare Rural Hospital Flexibility Program helps to reduce CAHs financial burdens through a cost-based Medicare reimbursement for services rendered. AB 2024 Page 7 The primary eligibility requirements for CAHs are as follows: A CAH must have 25 or fewer acute care inpatient beds. It must be located more than 35 miles from another hospital (or 15 miles across secondary roads to account for difficult terrain such as mountains, rivers or snow). It must maintain an annual average length of stay of 96 hours or less for acute care patients. It must provide 24/7 emergency care services. CAH Mileage Exemption. The CAH requirements also included a provision allowing states to waive the minimum of 35 miles distance requirement and designate small hospitals considered "necessary providers" as CAHs. This permitted states to provide small, struggling facilities with federal funding. The exemption provision was utilized widely, and more than 1,300, or nearly one in four acute care hospitals, had been designated as CAHs by 2006. In 2006, Congress eliminated the exception, and those hospitals that had already been designated as CAHs under the exemption were grandfathered. (Kaiser Health News, When Critical Access Hospitals Are Not So Critical, 2011). In California, there are 34 CAHs. Of those, 3 have received an exemption: 1) Redwood Memorial Hospital in Fortuna, CA, 2) Healdsburg District Hospital in Healdsburg, CA and 3) Orchard Hospital in Gridley, CA. The Ban on the Corporate Practice of Medicine (CPM). The CPM is defined as any involvement of corporations in medicine. The CPM may also be defined more narrowly, for example, as the employment of a physician by a lay-controlled corporation that AB 2024 Page 8 sells the services of the physician for a profit or provides the physician's services to its employees free of charge. The CPM now most commonly refers to the employment of physicians by hospitals, but is also used to refer to employment of physicians by for-profit and non-profit corporate entities and government (see BPC § 2400). According to a report published by the California Research Bureau, The Corporate Practice of Medicine Doctrine, the ban on CPM evolved in the early 20th century when mining companies had to hire physicians directly to provide care for their employees in remote areas. However, problems arose when physicians' loyalty to the mining companies conflicted with patients' needs. Eventually, physicians, courts, and legislatures prohibited CPM in an effort to preserve physicians' autonomy and improve patient care. Currently, only five states: 1) California, 2) Colorado, 3) Iowa, 4) Ohio and, 5) Texas, clearly prohibit hospitals from employing physicians and in all five states, certain types of hospitals and providers are exempt from the ban. Exemptions to the Ban on the CPM. The following entities may employ physicians: A clinic operated primarily of the purpose of medical education by a public or private nonprofit university medical school. AB 2024 Page 9 A clinic operated by a nonprofit corporation as an entity organized and operated exclusively for scientific and charitable purposes. A narcotic treatment program. A hospital owned and operated by a licensed charitable organization that offers only pediatric subspecialty care, as specified. A health maintenance organization (HMO). The author indicates that due to the problems with recruiting and retaining physicians to work in CAHs, CAHs should be included as a group that is exempt from the ban on the CPM. Prior Related Legislation. SB 1274 (Wolk), Chapter 793, Statutes of 2012, permits a hospital that is owned and operated by a charitable organization and offers only pediatric subspecialty care to begin billing health carriers for physician services rendered, notwithstanding the prohibition in the CPM if specified conditions are met. AB 824 (Chesbro) of 2012, would have established a pilot project to permit certain rural hospitals to directly employ physicians and surgeons. Note: AB 824died in the Assembly Committee on Health. AB 2024 Page 10 AB 648 (Swanson) of 2010, would have established a demonstration project to permit rural hospitals, as defined, whose service area includes a medically underserved or federally designated shortage area and which meet certain specified requirements, to directly employ physicians and surgeons, and required a report to be completed by MBC regarding the project and submitted to the Legislature by June 1, 2019. Note: AB 648 failed passage in the Senate Committee on Business, Professions and Economic Development. AB 646 (Swanson) of 2009, would have permitted health care districts and certain public hospitals, independent community nonprofit hospitals, and clinics, as specified, to directly employ physicians and surgeons. Note: AB 646 failed passage in the Senate Committee on Business, Professions and Economic Development. SB 726 (Ashburn) of 2009, would have revised and extended the MBC pilot project that allows qualified district hospitals, as defined, to employ a physician, if the hospital does not interfere with, control, or otherwise direct the professional judgment of the physician. Note: SB 726 failed passage in the Senate Committee on Business, Professions and Economic Development. AB 1944 (Swanson) of 2008, would have allowed health care districts to employ a physician. Note: AB 1944 died in the Senate Committee on Health. SB 1294 (Ducheny) of 2008, would have expanded the pilot project enabling health care districts to directly employ physicians. Note: SB 1294 failed passage in the Assembly Appropriations Committee. AB 2024 Page 11 SB 1640 (Ashburn) of 2008 would have expanded the pilot project to enable general acute care hospitals to directly employ physicians. Note: SB 1640 failed passage in the Assembly Committee on Business and Professions. SB 376 (Chesbro), Chapter 411, Statutes of 2003, authorized, until January 1, 2011, a hospital owned and operated by a health care district meeting specified criteria to employ a physician, and to charge for professional services rendered by the physician if the physician approves the charges. ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: The California Hospital Association supports the bill and writes, "All states allow employment of physicians, subject to certain conditions. However, California continues to be the most restrictive state for employment of physicians by hospitals. Ninety-two percent of medical residents would prefer employment with a salary in their first practice rather than an independent practice income guarantee or loan. To remain competitive in an already challenging environment, CAHs should have the opportunity to offer physicians economic security and financial stability through employment, thereby ensuring that rural residents have access to medically necessary services." The Catalina Island Medical Center writes, "With the rapid changes in healthcare due to the Affordable Care Act, the federal government is in the process of changing the methods of reimbursement to rural hospitals. Rural hospitals are on the cusp of receiving bundled payments for the services that patients receive from physicians and the organization. This change in reimbursement methodology is forcing all hospitals to employ physicians. To remain competitive in an already challenging environment, we should have the opportunity to offer physicians economic security and financial stability through AB 2024 Page 12 employment." The Alliance of Catholic Healthcare writes in their letter of support, "[We are] pleased to support AB 2024 because our member health systems and hospitals know firsthand about the significant difficulties hospitals encounter in attracting, recruiting and retaining physicians to practice in rural and underserved communities. The ability to hire physicians will directly improve and increase access to quality health care services and the health of the communities that our hospitals serve. The ability to recruit and retain physicians, both primary care and specialists, through direct employment contributes to the economic stability of the hospital and the community." The Association of California Healthcare Districts supports the bill and writes, "Healthcare Districts located in rural and remote areas of the state have a difficult time recruiting health professional to their areas. In many communities, doctors cannot support themselves financially in an independent practice. This makes it extremely difficult for rural communities to attract and retain physicians. Additionally, many physicians working in rural communities are nearing retirement. ACHD supports a number of solutions to increase access to care and allowing critical access hospitals to directly hire physicians is one important solution." Several hospitals including: Fairchild Medical Center, San Bernardino Mountains Community Hospital, Eastern Plumas Health Care, Glenn Medical Center, Mendocino Coast District Hospital , Kern Valley Healthcare District , Santa Ynez Valley Cottage Hospital , Northern Inyo Healthcare District , Mayers Memorial Hospital District , Plumas District Hospital , Trinity Hospital , and Orchard Hospital , support the bill and write in their letters, "CAHs are the smallest, most remote rural hospitals, and we face numerous challenges in effectively recruiting and AB 2024 Page 13 retaining physicians. One of the biggest challenges is not being able to hire physicians who ask to be hired." The District Hospital Leadership Forum supports the bill and writes, "Physician shortages and maldistribution are very real problems in rural and underserved communities that threaten the ability of California residents to received timely access to quality health care." The Adventist Health and Loma Linda University Health also support the bill, "We know firsthand about the significant difficulties hospitals encounter in attracting, recruiting and retaining physicians to practice in rural and underserved communities." AMENDMENTS: In order to provide the Legislature with data on the effectiveness of the exemption proposed in this bill, the bill should be amended to include: 1)A seven year sunset date. 2)A requirement that the Legislative Analyst Office provides a report to the Legislature, at the conclusion of the seven year sunset date, containing data about the impact of the CPM exemption on CAHs during the seven year time frame. REGISTERED SUPPORT: California Hospital Association AB 2024 Page 14 Catalina Island Medical Center Adventist Health and Loma Linda University Health Alliance of Catholic Healthcare Association of California Healthcare Districts District Hospital Leadership Forum Eastern Plumas Health Care Fairchild Medical Center Glenn Medical Center Kern Valley Healthcare District Mayers Memorial Hospital District Mendocino Coast District Hospital Northern Inyo Healthcare District Orchard Hospital AB 2024 Page 15 Plumas District Hospital San Bernardino Mountains Community Hospital Santa Ynez Valley Cottage Hospital Trinity Hospital REGISTERED OPPOSITION: None on file. Analysis Prepared by:Le Ondra Clark Harvey, Ph.D. / B. & P. / (916) 319-3301