AB 2026,
as amended, Hadley. California Environmental Qualitybegin delete Act.end deletebegin insert Act: judicial challenge: identification of contributors.end insert
The California Environmental Quality Act requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect.begin delete Existing law declares the policy of the state that a project to be carried out by a public agency be subject to the same level of review and consideration under the act as that required of private projects required to be approved by public agencies.end deletebegin insert The act authorizes specified entities to file and maintain with a court an action or proceeding to attack,
review, set aside, void, or annul an act of a public agency on grounds of noncompliance with the requirements of the act.end insert
This bill would make a technical, nonsubstantive change to those provisions.
end deleteThis bill would require a plaintiff or petitioner, in an action brought pursuant to the act, to disclose the identity of a person or entity that contributes in excess of $1,000, as specified, toward the plaintiff’s or petitioner’s costs of the action. The bill also would require the plaintiff or petitioner to identify any pecuniary or business interest related to the project or issues involved in the action of any person or entity that contributes in excess of $1,000 to the costs of the action, as specified. The bill would provide that a failure to comply with these requirements may be grounds for dismissal of the action by the court.
end insertVote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
(a) The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:
3(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13
4(commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code)
5facilitates the maintenance of a quality environment for the people
6of the state through identification of significant effects on the
7environment caused by a proposed project, consideration of
8alternatives, and implementation of feasible mitigation measures
9to reduce those effects.
10(2) The act is premised on transparency in decisionmaking
11through public dissemination of information about a proposed
12project’s effect on the environment.
13(3) The act empowers the public to challenge a project in court
14for failure to fully comply with the act’s exhaustive disclosure and
15mitigation requirements.
16(4) Various entities are increasingly using litigation pursuant
17to the act for competitive purposes to either frustrate a competitor’s
18project or to extract concessions from a project proponent.
19(5) Despite the focus on transparency and public disclosure in
20the decisionmaking process, shadow groups funded by unknown
21backers often threaten and bring litigation challenging proposed
22projects without being required to disclose who is funding the
23litigation or what financial interests those entities
have related to
24the proposed project.
25(6) Project opponents sometimes strategically use litigation to
26delay a project past its point of economic viability, thereby using
27litigation to stop projects that could not otherwise be stopped
28during the decisionmaking process.
P3 1(7) California Rules of Court require the disclosure of entities
2that fund the preparation and submission of amicus briefs to the
3court.
4(8) The state and public have a compelling interest in the
5disclosure of the identities of entities that fund litigation under the
6act so they can better understand the identities of those
7organizations participating in the public decisionmaking process,
8determine whether the petitioner or plaintiff may be suing for
9competitive or other nonenvironmental purposes, and protect
10scarce judicial resources by deterring
entities from using lawsuits
11for competitive or other nonenvironmental purposes.
12(9) The courts have a compelling interest in disclosure to
13determine whether the plaintiff or petitioner is seeking to advance
14environmental, nonenvironmental, or a mix of environmental and
15nonenvironmental interests in filing an action pursuant to the act.
16(b) It is the intent of the Legislature to require plaintiffs and
17petitioners bringing an action pursuant to the act to disclose those
18persons or entities who make contributions to fund the preparation
19of the petition and subsequent actions or proceedings and any
20financial interests they may have related to the proposed project.
begin insertSection 21175 is added to the end insertbegin insertPublic Resources Codeend insertbegin insert,
22to read:end insert
(a) In an action or proceeding to attack, review, set
24aside, void, or annul any act or decision of a public agency on the
25grounds of noncompliance with this division, the plaintiff or
26petitioner shall include an affidavit identifying every person or
27entity who made a monetary contribution of one thousand dollars
28($1,000) or more, or committed to contribute one thousand dollars
29($1,000) or more, for the preparation of the petition and subsequent
30action or proceeding.
31(b) The plaintiff or petitioner shall have a continuing obligation
32throughout the course of the proceeding to identify any person or
33entity that has made a single or multiple contributions or
34commitments, the sum of which is $1,000 or more, and that were
35intended to fund the
action or proceeding.
36(c) The disclosures required pursuant to subdivisions (a) and
37(b) shall also include the identity of any pecuniary or business
38interest that the person or entity has related to the proposed
39project.
P4 1(d) A plaintiff or petitioner may request the court’s permission
2to withhold the public disclosure of a contributor. The court may
3grant the request if it finds that the public interest in keeping that
4information confidential clearly outweighs the public interest in
5disclosure.
6(e) A court may, upon its own motion or the motion of any party,
7take any action necessary to compel compliance with the
8requirements of this section, up to and including dismissal of the
9action or proceeding.
10(f) An individual contributing funds to file an
action or
11proceeding pursuant to this division in his or her individual
12capacity, and not as a representative for an organization or
13association, has the right to limit disclosure of his or her personal
14information to an in-camera review by the court.
15(g) The information disclosed pursuant to this section may be
16used to enable a court to determine whether the financial burden
17of private enforcement supports the award of attorneys’ fees in
18actions or proceedings brought to enforce this division.
Section 21001.1 of the Public Resources Code
20 is amended to read:
The Legislature further finds and declares that it is
22the policy of the state that projects to be carried out by public
23agencies be subject to the same level of review and consideration
24under this division as that required of private projects required to
25be approved by public agencies.
O
98